Hey dumb dave

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,242
3,304
113
I'm not dingbat, but it told me that Warren and Biden are proposing unConstitutional taxes.
I love when this fvcking tard doesn’t read his articles.

“That's according to an analysis of tax data by two prominent economists, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman of the University of California at Berkeley, that is a centerpiece of their new book, "The Triumph of Injustice," to be published on October 15. Saez and Zucman, who have worked with the noted French economist Thomas Piketty to produce seminal research on inequality, also advised Senator Elizabeth Warren on the Democratic presidential candidate's plan to impose awealth tax on ultra-rich families.“

An entire article based on data by economists who focus on income inequality.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Hey cuntry. You do realize the wealthy create the jobs, right? And you do realize the wealthy pay the majority of taxes, right?
Lol, still waiting on the trickle down? It worked in Kansas didn't it? you rubes ain't scientists or economists, just all believing scapegoats.
 

WVU80ate_rivals

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2003
4,243
0
0
Lol, still waiting on the trickle down? It worked in Kansas didn't it? you rubes ain't scientists or economists, just all believing scapegoats.
if you want wealth, work for it. Stop putting your hand out waiting for someone to give it to you
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
My AGI went up by 15% and I paid $1000 less.
Just think how rich people did. Do you own a flow through or are you an employee?

Anyway - a lot of this study is misleading as hell. % is high on you poors because of SS/Medi. SS/Medi is a flat rate and SS has a max contribution on earned income. Can there be disagreements about the "fairness" of the tax system? From both sides? Yes. I don't think this study says anything though.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,153
113
Hey cuntry. You do realize the wealthy create the jobs, right? And you do realize the wealthy pay the majority of taxes, right?

What all these Liberals/Socialists/Marxists evidently don't realize is, that we live in a mobile economy, which greatly benefits/protects the wealthiest.

Tax the $h!t out of the wealthy (like these Liberals/Socialists/Marxists plan on doing) and they simply move their wealth to another country. It's as simple as that. Then, who is left with the burden to pay for all of this free stuff the Liberals/Socialists/Marxists are promising?

That's right...The elimination of the middle class. Simple logic the Liberals'/Socialists'/Marxists' sheep can't understand due to their indoctrinated, blind hatred.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
I love when this fvcking tard doesn’t read his articles.

“That's according to an analysis of tax data by two prominent economists, Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman of the University of California at Berkeley, that is a centerpiece of their new book, "The Triumph of Injustice," to be published on October 15. Saez and Zucman, who have worked with the noted French economist Thomas Piketty to produce seminal research on inequality, also advised Senator Elizabeth Warren on the Democratic presidential candidate's plan to impose awealth tax on ultra-rich families.“

An entire article based on data by economists who focus on income inequality.
"Income inequality" has exploded since the early 80s....the same time tax rates have plummeted. It's incredibly wrong to jump to the conclusion that A caused B. Technology gains since the 1980s are insane. How big a role does that play in "income inequality"? How much does the lower taxes lead to technology changes? Etc, etc, etc. Partisan hacks always look at this **** in a vacuum. The simple truths are: The rich are richer. The middle are richer. The poor are richer. It's what makes all the populist/protectionist garbage so maddening.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,242
3,304
113
Just think how rich people did. Do you own a flow through or are you an employee?

Anyway - a lot of this study is misleading as hell. % is high on you poors because of SS/Medi. SS/Medi is a flat rate and SS has a max contribution on earned income. Can there be disagreements about the "fairness" of the tax system? From both sides? Yes. I don't think this study says anything though.
Brother, I married one of you people so I don’t have to deal with this ****. To answer your opening questions, I have no idea. I let the licensed one take care of it and since our stuff has gotten so complicated, the firm actually does all of our stuff for us now as one of the benefits of her career growth.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,242
3,304
113
"Income inequality" has exploded since the early 80s....the same time tax rates have plummeted. It's incredibly wrong to jump to the conclusion that A caused B. Technology gains since the 1980s are insane. How big a role does that play in "income inequality"? How much does the lower taxes lead to technology changes? Etc, etc, etc. Partisan hacks always look at this **** in a vacuum. The simple truths are: The rich are richer. The middle are richer. The poor are richer. It's what makes all the populist/protectionist garbage so maddening.
Agreed.
 

WVU80ate_rivals

Redshirt
Jun 10, 2003
4,243
0
0
What all these Liberals/Socialists/Marxists evidently don't realize is, that we live in a mobile economy, which greatly benefits/protects the wealthiest.

Tax the $h!t out of the wealthy (like these Liberals/Socialists/Marxists plan on doing) and they simply move their wealth to another country. It's as simple as that. Then, who is left with the burden to pay for all of this free stuff the Liberals/Socialists/Marxists are promising?

That's right...The elimination of the middle class. Simple logic the Liberals'/Socialists'/Marxists' sheep can't understand due to their indoctrinated, blind hatred.
Exactly. That’s how China exploded and became a super power. All our businesses left to go there. Democrats are to blame as their platform has always been about raising taxes for socialist policies and implementing them (Ex: The minimum wage). You can’t fault the corporations for leaving. We taxed them too much and destroyed our economy by raising the minimum wage to the point it’s virtually eliminated the middle class. When a big corporation can pay less tax and less wage, they’re gonna leave here. That’s why Trump is enforcing tariffs to hit their wallets to bring the business back to the US.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
That's right...The elimination of the middle class. Simple logic the Liberals'/Socialists'/Marxists' sheep can't understand due to their indoctrinated, blind hatred.
The middle class was "eliminated" by moving up to the rich class. Our rich are richer and bigger. Our middle are richer and smaller. Our poors are richer and smaller.

Sorry you got left behind, but Americans are (were?) prospering.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,666
6,269
113
Doesn't change the facts, moron.

YOU are part of the problem! You are among the "evil rich" who exploit the poor while hoarding waaaaaaay more than YOU need personally. YOU didn't even feel compelled to share your windfall with the thirsty, the hungry, the homeless, and the hopeless.

Shame on you! Show yourself, and face justice by having 70% of your earnings taxed at confiscatory rates! Stop hiding behind your wealth! Pay your "wealth tax" and self identify as a 1% er. Let the board see what a Life of luxury and leisure does to an already ravaged appearance.
 
Last edited:

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,153
113
The middle class was "eliminated" by moving up to the rich class. Our rich are richer and bigger. Our middle are richer and smaller. Our poors are richer and smaller.

Sorry you got left behind, but Americans are (were?) prospering.

The downfall was definitely noticeable under Obama, better under Trump (stats show) and with what the left is proposing, what do you think will happen if one of those Socialists/Marxists gets in?
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
The downfall was definitely noticeable under Obama, better under Trump (stats show) and with what the left is proposing, what do you think will happen if one of those Socialists/Marxists gets in?
What downfall? Under what metrics are you using? The 2007/2008 Great Recession hurt, but Americans have benefited greatly since the 1980's (Technology, freer trade, globalism, lower taxes).
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,666
6,269
113
What graph says otherwise? It's inarguable. Americans are richer and better off than they were in the 80's.

Country knows you're lying. Only country is doing better with that 250K income last year, less than .05% of which was donated to the poor and absolutely 0% claimed as itemized deductions on the 2018 tax return filed on that income.
 
Last edited:

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,153
113
What downfall? Under what metrics are you using? The 2007/2008 Great Recession hurt, but Americans have benefited greatly since the 1980's (Technology, freer trade, globalism, lower taxes).

What do you think will happen if one of those Socialists/Marxists (Warren/Sanders) gets in?
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Brother, I married one of you people so I don’t have to deal with this ****. To answer your opening questions, I have no idea. I let the licensed one take care of it and since our stuff has gotten so complicated, the firm actually does all of our stuff for us now as one of the benefits of her career growth.

Does she plan Cones of Dunshire with you?
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
What do you think will happen if one of those Socialists/Marxists (Warren/Sanders) gets in?
Nothing worse than this protectionist lowlife. Maybe a GOP senate will stand up to them? Maybe they will win back th house and care about spending again?
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,336
2,421
113
I have never received a nice fat paycheck from a poor bastard...God bless the greedy rich bastard on there way to hell ...cut the rich mans taxes & put more people to work ...& on that little note, this scummy little uneducated deplorable is going cruising with the girlfriend looking for a new house as im drinking beer & getting a roadie....life is good in my off season
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
The graph in the link I posted in the OP. It addresses tax percentages, not income or wealth.
I legit don't know what you are saying. Taxes are lower since the 80's. America is richer since the 80's Rich American are richer since the 80's. Middle class Americans are richer since the 80's. Poors are richer since the 80's.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
I legit don't know what you are saying. Taxes are lower since the 80's. America is richer since the 80's Rich American are richer since the 80's. Middle class Americans are richer since the 80's. Poors are richer since the 80's.

OK never mind. The only thing I was trying to point out was that the tax for wealthy Americans has went down (since the 80s) and the tax for the middle class has not went down (since the 80s), it has remained constant.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
OK never mind. The only thing I was trying to point out was that the tax for wealthy Americans has went down (since the 80s) and the tax for the middle class has not went down (since the 80s), it has remained constant.
Oh. Ok I got ya. SS and Medi taxes are the major players in that misleading study, imo. Again, yes, it can be argued that the rich are getting wealthier (via trade, taxes, technology) more than the poors and middles but I don't think this specific click bait study is an honest place to start from.
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,226
5,153
113
Nothing worse than this protectionist lowlife. Maybe a GOP senate will stand up to them? Maybe they will win back th house and care about spending again?

Where's the money going to come from to pay for everything they're proposing?

What are they proposing, specifically, that you like so much?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,242
3,304
113
Does she plan Cones of Dunshire with you?
No, but she shows me her boobies, let’s me climb on top of her and chugs my hog a couple 3-4 times a week (when she’s in town). I feel like I’m ahead of the power curve of awesomeness.
 

79eer

Junior
Oct 4, 2008
8,544
394
83
What do you think will happen if one of those Socialists/Marxists (Warren/Sanders) gets in?
Mr. Coop is a BS’er. He’s already on record stating if it came to a choice between Trump & Sanders, his vote is going to Sanders. You have to wear boots when reading some of these threads.
Ps. Hip boots if you have them.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,556
40
31
Where's the money going to come from to pay for everything they're proposing?

What are they proposing, specifically, that you like so much?
Probably the richers, but why are you worried? You're not batting an eye at TRILLION dollar deficits during times of expansion. Are you saying you will pretend to care once a lib is in charge?