So, 41 for me. I was going with “ten years older than your oldest child.” That fits. “As young as your kids will let you get away with” works too. For me that’s probably the aforementioned ten years older than your oldest child. (I do not want to see my younger daughter on the warpath. She would be The Breath of Hell.)Half your age plus 7 years.
Look at it from the other perspective. If you were a young man, how old a woman would you date. If you’re 24, would you date 72? Same standard should apply. Flip the perspective. If you wouldn’t date that age as a young man, you shouldn’t date the younger age when you’re old.
I took a close 2nd look at the Belichick photo and noticed he’s wearing his Super Bowl Rings on both hands.
The guy is a winner and he has good taste
I took a close 2nd look at the Belichick photo and noticed he’s wearing his Super Bowl Rings on both hands.
The guy is a winner and he has good taste.
If she is younger than one of your kids very creepy and if Billy Boy was a truck driver from Omaha she wouldn’t be 10 miles near him.
Ok, being the same age, looking at physical and cognitive changes that occur with healthy aging and yes that is open to interpretation. I honestly find it difficult to say this is a sustainable healthy pathway, in the real world. Of course Coach Bill’s life is pretty remarkable, wish him well moving forward.
If she is younger than one of your kids very creepy and if Billy Boy was a truck driver from Omaha she wouldn’t be 10 miles near him.
Doesn’t matter the decade, creepy is creepy in any time period.As long as she is at least 20, there is no such thing as awkward. Thank goodness we no longer live in the 1950s.
What are the rules for IQ/mental agility gaps? At 60 and legally single I can say it’s been a far bigger factor than age/looks in my world. I think the worst trait in a partner is them having the *ability* to think well, but be too lazy to actually do it.
In your case, just ask if they rode the short bus to school ... if they say "yes," ask them out. Gap problem solved.What are the rules for IQ/mental agility gaps? At 60 and legally single I can say it’s been a far bigger factor than age/looks in my world. I think the worst trait in a partner is them having the *ability* to think well, but be too lazy to actually do it.
Well we know how many people are bad at math.Half your age plus 7 years.
I completely agree. I am in my early 50's. My wife is in her early 40's, which isn't a big deal. However, we joke at times that when I a freshman at PSU, she was still in elementary school.It also depends on the timing. I met my wife when I was in my early 30s. She was in her mid to late 20s. No big deal at all (except getting heath insurance for her after I retired). But when I was a third year grad student, she was graduating high school. That would have been a bigger deal--then.
I am married, since 1982....pastor said everything of mine now becomes hers....she reminds me of that every week (payday).Paying for it has always been degrading.
How many of you would want your 20-something daughters or granddaughters dating Billy Ballbag?
The only correct answer.Half your age plus 7 years.
So 20.If two consenting adults are genuinely happy together and supportive of each other, let them be. If there’s a limit of what would work FOR YOU, that’s fine… but recognize it’s a personal opinion.
Obviously there are situations where it’s NOT a good mix and one is trying to take advantage of the other. That can apply to any type of relationship, and of course that’s wrong. But it’s also wrong to say there’s some arbitrary rule that dictates which relationships are OK and which aren’t, completely overriding the nature of the individual people themselves and what’s right for them.
The “half your age plus seven” thing — a freaking mathematical formula to say who can be together as a couple, are you kidding me? Our constitution once said we could define some human beings as three-fifths of a person for certain purposes. Was that OK? Both of those “rules” are dehumanizing criteria pulled out of someone’s arse, both deserving to be put back from whence they came.
My grandparents had a 20-year age gap… they married in the early 1940’s and paid no mind to society’s bigotry on this topic. They were the most loving and honorable couple you could ever hope to meet, who would do anything for family, friends, or even strangers who might have needed help. They were all the evidence I ever needed for the true answer to this non-question.
What's wrong with the 1950s ? Don't knock it if you didn't live it. lolAs long as she is at least 20, there is no such thing as awkward. Thank goodness we no longer live in the 1950s.
If two consenting adults are genuinely happy together and supportive of each other, let them be. If there’s a limit of what would work FOR YOU, that’s fine… but recognize it’s a personal opinion.
Obviously there are situations where it’s NOT a good mix and one is trying to take advantage of the other. That can apply to any type of relationship, and of course that’s wrong. But it’s also wrong to say there’s some arbitrary rule that dictates which relationships are OK and which aren’t, completely overriding the nature of the individual people themselves and what’s right for them.
The “half your age plus seven” thing — a freaking mathematical formula to say who can be together as a couple, are you kidding me? Our constitution once said we could define some human beings as three-fifths of a person for certain purposes. Was that OK? Both of those “rules” are dehumanizing criteria pulled out of someone’s arse, both deserving to be put back from whence they came.
My grandparents had a 20-year age gap… they married in the early 1940’s and paid no mind to society’s bigotry on this topic. They were the most loving and honorable couple you could ever hope to meet, who would do anything for family, friends, or even strangers who might have needed help. They were all the evidence I ever needed for the true answer to this non-question.