They can just serve her lawyer instead of looking for headlines. Of course the Secret Service isn't going to let her get served papers. Same as Trump after he's out of office.
her lawyer refused the papers as well, but apparently, they had a change of heart, and she's now been served. just another waste of time, as everybody knows . . . the Clintons are the untouchables.They can just serve her lawyer instead of looking for headlines. Of course the Secret Service isn't going to let her get served papers. Same as Trump after he's out of office.
the retired grandma can't keep her mouth shutThat retired grandmaw lives in their heads rent free, now Ima go kill some cows, lol.
Gabbard's lawyers said they went to the media in an attempt to get HC's lawyers to accept the documents.They can just serve her lawyer instead of looking for headlines. Of course the Secret Service isn't going to let her get served papers. Same as Trump after he's out of office.
How does this all work......the article implied her lawyer did not accept the papers.They can just serve her lawyer instead of looking for headlines. Of course the Secret Service isn't going to let her get served papers. Same as Trump after he's out of office.
Her lawyers refused it as well. Read the article.They can just serve her lawyer instead of looking for headlines. Of course the Secret Service isn't going to let her get served papers. Same as Trump after he's out of office.
Hadn't heard that. Refusing to be physically served doesn't mean you haven't been served anyway. Seems like much ado about nothing to me.How does this all work......the article implied her lawyer did not accept the papers.
And it means nothing. Try to get a clue.Her lawyers refused it as well. Read the article.
FFS man. You made an assumption and you were wrong. Stop acting like a triggered little *****.And it means nothing. Try to get a clue.
Try and not be completely wrong about everything. My first response still holds up. Just because her lawyers "refused" to be served doesn't mean she's not served. :joy::joy::joy:FFS man. You made an assumption and you were wrong. Stop acting like a triggered little *****.
Child molester breaking his neck to suck up to DvlDogPooper breaking his neck to defend the woman he voted for.
Child molester breaking his neck to suck up to DvlDog
[cheers][cheers]That retired grandmaw lives in their heads rent free, now Ima go kill some cows, lol.
Gee, TWO fold obstruction of justice!Her lawyers refused it as well. Read the article.
They actually have to see the server, no? It’s not like he can leave it with the security company at the front desk of the building.Try and not be completely wrong about everything. My first response still holds up. Just because her lawyers "refused" to be served doesn't mean she's not served. :joy::joy::joy:
lolwut? They absolutely can leave it. Or send it by mail. Or put it in a newspaper. etc, etc, etc. Let's get back to you trying to have a clue. Being served papers isn't like the teevee says it is.They actually have to see the server, no? It’s not like he can leave it with the security company at the front desk of the building.
By not molesting me as a child? No. I'm good.Did I hurt your little feelings fatty?
Fair enough, I wasn’t aware they could mail them. I thought they actually had to be served in person.lolwut? They absolutely can leave it. Or send it by mail. Or put it in a newspaper. etc, etc, etc. Let's get back to you trying to have a clue. Being served papers isn't like the teevee says it is.
ergo, back to my original point, seems like somebody's lawyers are more interested in headlines. **gasp**
By not molesting me as a child? No. I'm good.
Cooper really needed a win. What a c<nt.Fair enough, I wasn’t aware they could mail them. I thought they actually had to be served in person.
Sooooo..............much ado about nothing. This whole thread.Fair enough, I wasn’t aware they could mail them. I thought they actually had to be served in person.
50 million in summery judgement will cause you to reconsider.her lawyer refused the papers as well, but apparently, they had a change of heart, and she's now been served. just another waste of time, as everybody knows . . . the Clintons are the untouchables.
This place isnt where you need to preach that. I heard on at least ABC Radio, Fox Radio and once on TV somewhere that she refused to be served. I knew that was a thing but not theae days.Try and not be completely wrong about everything. My first response still holds up. Just because her lawyers "refused" to be served doesn't mean she's not served. :joy::joy::joy:
You trusted those media outlets on this story, but not any other time? Clintons sell headlines. As does Trump going forward. Try and take a skeptical approach about any news you hear, and especially with divisive figures.This place isnt where you need to preach that. I heard on at least ABC Radio, Fox Radio and once on TV somewhere that she refused to be served. I knew that was a thing but not theae days.
Who said I trusted them? I said that they were telling that story. You telling me to be skeptical of media after 3 years of your droning about Trump colluding with Russia. HahahaYou trusted those media outlets on this story, but not any other time? Clintons sell headlines. As does Trump going forward. Try and take a skeptical approach about any news you hear, and especially with divisive figures.