Willie and Fellers did a good show analyzing the impact of RTCs on overall performance. The best correlator for college success is a robust RTC, not individual and recruiting class rankings. Ohio State is the best example. Their top teams (1, 3, 2, 2, 2) with the second to last 2nd place was their 133.5 team that lost to Penn State happened when they had their RTC buzzing. They actually upped their recruiting level since then if anything but their performance at NCAAs isn't nearly as good. Stieber was an active athlete and their lower weights were killing it, they had Tervel there and Martin, Moore (who was not a highly ranked guy) and Snyder were obviously scoring big points.
Similarly, Dake/Snyder were the big time signees for NLWC but Bekzod and Gomez were boosting our middleweights for years before that.
There are way more good high schoolers these days and the gap is not large at all between the top guys, especially when you consider what ultimately matters is how they perform 2-3 years removed from HS, not senior year of HS or even the first year of college. Ultimately unlocking the talent comes with senior level talent being able to push them and coach them as well (each senior RTC athlete serves as a coach)
DT clearly is prioritizing his RTC first and foremost and it'll pay off ... fast.