Objectively, Drew Crawford was a far better player than Tre Demps. He was a part of better teams, he was a better defender, he scored more, he boarded much better, he got to the bucket better, he was better from the line.
But for me, the Crawford memory that sticks out best was the game in Ann Arbor in 2012, when he just...couldn't...get off a shot late in the game when nu cleared out for him. Crawford was a great player but he seemingly shrunk a bit at the big moments.
Demps, meanwhile, is/was an incredibly flawed player. Volume shooter. Maybe a bit selfish. Again, didn't defend so well. And a great athlete but undersized at the 2.
But, sheesh, a killer late in the game. He missed in the conference tourney last week, but NU definitely and without hesitation went to him for the game winner. And while he missed that one, he hit so many big late shots earlier in his career. He had an ability to catch fire in a way that I haven't seen since I started following the program closely in 1998. (No Walters, no Geno.)
So, let's say Tre was a few years older and Drew a few years younger, and Tre was the guy who came to NU the year after Johnny Shurna. Would a Juice-Demps-Johnny Cash core have achieved what a Juice-Drew-Shurna core could not?
Basically, would Demps' late-game wizardry with a shot of inconsistency be a better fit than Drew's game-to-game consistency with far fewer moments of individual brilliance?
My thought? I have no idea, but it's interesting to consider. I feel like Tre is a bit underestimated here, probably (and accurately) since he didn't play on any really good teams.
That 2012 Michigan highlight reel is below, if I did it right, because there's some dude who posts 30+ minute Michigan clips. That was an ugly ending. (I don't know what's in the clip.)
But for me, the Crawford memory that sticks out best was the game in Ann Arbor in 2012, when he just...couldn't...get off a shot late in the game when nu cleared out for him. Crawford was a great player but he seemingly shrunk a bit at the big moments.
Demps, meanwhile, is/was an incredibly flawed player. Volume shooter. Maybe a bit selfish. Again, didn't defend so well. And a great athlete but undersized at the 2.
But, sheesh, a killer late in the game. He missed in the conference tourney last week, but NU definitely and without hesitation went to him for the game winner. And while he missed that one, he hit so many big late shots earlier in his career. He had an ability to catch fire in a way that I haven't seen since I started following the program closely in 1998. (No Walters, no Geno.)
So, let's say Tre was a few years older and Drew a few years younger, and Tre was the guy who came to NU the year after Johnny Shurna. Would a Juice-Demps-Johnny Cash core have achieved what a Juice-Drew-Shurna core could not?
Basically, would Demps' late-game wizardry with a shot of inconsistency be a better fit than Drew's game-to-game consistency with far fewer moments of individual brilliance?
My thought? I have no idea, but it's interesting to consider. I feel like Tre is a bit underestimated here, probably (and accurately) since he didn't play on any really good teams.
That 2012 Michigan highlight reel is below, if I did it right, because there's some dude who posts 30+ minute Michigan clips. That was an ugly ending. (I don't know what's in the clip.)