Players win. What system does Duke, Kentucky or MSU play? System teams like our Princeton offense or Walkers initial spread offense are implemented to cover for talent deficient squads. Can work initially, but are eventually figuring out. You need players to win! Red Auerbach isn’t leading this group to the Natty.
I agree that players win, the rich get richer and the poor...
It’s interesting to check out when the teams in the B1G last won a regular season title. First of all, the 4 newcomers (PSU, UNL, RU and MD) have yet to win.
Among the prior 10 teams, 6 have won in this decade (MSU, Pur, Ind, Wisconsin, OSU and Mich.)
The Illini won in ‘05.
So 3 of the 10 (Minn, Iowa, NU) have not won in this century. You could include PSU as they played that whole stretch.
Minnesota last won in 97, Iowa in 79, and the Cats in 31. If you did the same lookback in 2000, you would find that 7 teams had won in the last 15 years and 3 had not. 2 are obvious: Iowa and NU. The other is Wisconsin, whose last title as of 2000 was 1947.
Arguably, since 1980, the only team to win a title that did not have some recent history of winning the title was Wisconsin, when they won in ‘02. They subsequently won in ‘03, ‘08, and ‘15.
I’ve argued before, and will argue here that Wisconsin’s leap came based on building a team with a physically strong interior defense, layered with enough enough pattern based offense and excellent free throw shooting to slow the game down, reduce overall scoring and win close games. It may be boring basketball, but it can produce a team that wins with talent rated below the talent the current consistent winners get.
Kudos to Wisconsin for pulling this off. It clearly is hard, takes commitment, acumen and luck on the part of the AD, and rarely happens.
I hope it happens at NU someday. While I’m wishing, I hope Collins is the unicorn who can attract the talent and win a title, breaking a historical trend that goes back to 1931.