I Am Sickened By The Venemous Hate Filled Rants Towards Coaches and Players

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
By that horrible logic Cal gets zero credit for the current success of the basketball team.
You are an absolute fail at understanding what logic even means , don't even reference it . I am taking about the decades before Stoops , it's not fair to put a lifetime of fail all on them . If it applied to Cal then he couldn't take credit for any UK success before his tenure . You aren't going to get that but there it is anyway .
 

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,978
103,692
78
You are an absolute fail at understanding what logic even means , don't even reference it . I am taking about the decades before Stoops , it's not fair to put a lifetime of fail all on them . If it applied to Cal then he couldn't take credit for any UK success before his tenure . You aren't going to get that but there it is anyway .
Dead wrong. You say it's not fair to put decades of failure at the current team's feet; meaning you believe it is decades of failure that has put them in their current hole, and it's not 100% their fault for the current ineptitude we are witnessing. Thereby (since I have to break this down into tiny fragments so you can mentally digest them because you weren't capable of connecting the dots from my post on your own) Cal does not get credit for all of his current success either, since clearly it must be a product of his predecessors.

Again, that's not what I'm saying, that's what you're saying with your jackass fallacy that we can't put all of this on the current coaches and players. We absolutely can and should. The previous decades mean squat, just as Cal's success has nothing to do with our past.
 
Last edited:

lex cath

Heisman
Jan 6, 2016
7,782
12,104
0
Dead wrong. You say it's not fair to put decades of failure at the current team's feet; meaning you believe it is decades of failure that has put them in their current hole, and it's not 100% their fault for the current ineptitude we are witnessing. Thereby (since I have to break this down into tiny fragments so you can actually mentally digest them since you weren't capable of connecting the dots from my post on your own) Cal does not get credit for all of his current success either, since clearly it must be a product of his predecessors.

Again, that's not what I'm saying, that's what you're saying with your jackass fallacy that we can't put all of this on the current coaches and players. We absolutely can and should. The precious decades mean squat, just as Cal's success has nothing to do with our past.


We need jauk to steer us into the national championship [banana]
 

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,978
103,692
78
We need jauk to steer us into the national championship [banana]
Absolutely. We need more fans like him and the guy above to tell us to accept the situation and that it's all OK. That is the path to success.
 

BigBlueTuckian

Sophomore
Jan 9, 2016
309
198
0
I know some of you will want to bash me but Ican truly feel that this week starts the turn around process. What have we got to lose? We beat New Mexico State, then a bad SC program and we are on our way. The team that I think will give us the most trouble will be Miss. State but we have them at home and by then we will know that 6 wins is doable if we take care of business.
All I am asking is to give this team one more chance and yourselves one more chance to be part of a BIG turn around. We have the facilities in place so now we just need 6 wins and we are on our way.

Good post overall OP, but some of your words I find troublesome.

If we beat New Mexico State and South Carolina we are on our way to what exactly? These are two teams that everyone predicted us to beat before the season. We would have accomplished exactly nothing but go par for the course, except for that gigantic hiccup against Southern Miss.

Also you say that this weekend truly starts the turnaround. Did Mark Stoops say it would take 38 games to see it? Did he say no turnaround before game 39? Why couldn't it start against Southern Miss? Why couldn't it start against Florida? You're picking cream puff New Mexico State as the perfect point for your agenda because there's no doubt we're gonna blow them out of the water. Beating this team 70-0 proves NOTHING. THEY ARE THAT BAD. Beating South Carolina proves NOTHING. They are a mess and have a first year head coach who's a certified moron when it comes to offense. South Carolina and Steve Spurrier themselves got the guy fired 2 years ago because he could not run out the clock effectively.

So if we beat NMSU and SC, what exactly does that prove? It proves every preseason pundit right and it proves we're just above completely incompetent, nothing more. It does not signal a turnaround in any way.

Beat Alabama then we're talking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orionorl and CB3UK

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
Dead wrong. You say it's not fair to put decades of failure at the current team's feet; meaning you believe it is decades of failure that has put them in their current hole, and it's not 100% their fault for the current ineptitude we are witnessing. Thereby (since I have to break this down into tiny fragments so you can mentally digest them because you weren't capable of connecting the dots from my post on your own) Cal does not get credit for all of his current success either, since clearly it must be a product of his predecessors.

Again, that's not what I'm saying, that's what you're saying with your jackass fallacy that we can't put all of this on the current coaches and players. We absolutely can and should. The previous decades mean squat, just as Cal's success has nothing to do with our past.
I knew you couldn't get it , making up bs logic and attributing it to me is about what I expected . One more time I'll hold your hand , even though it's not going to help . Stoops is taking heat because posters are frustrated over a long string of events before Stoops was even coach . They reference Mitch's failures in hiring or the how they've put up with the losing so long and so on . The team is not to blame for all of that and shouldn't be seeing decades of venom spill onto them . You stroll in with championship level idiocracy and fail boat an analogy to Cal with some incoherent ramblings of him not getting credit for his success . The correct analogy would be Cal not getting credit for success prior to him . See how that works ? I didn't think so , let's do a simplified version .

Pre Stoops , no blame Stoops

Pre Cal , no credit Cal
 

UKfan2151

All-American
Oct 1, 2003
14,064
8,372
113
You're tired of people picking on the coaches. Okay. I get that. Most of us on the other hand are tired of getting our butts kicked because these coaches are failing in their job duties. I hope you can likewise appreciate our viewpoint. Considering the current state of affairs around here, I don't think it is unfair that these coaches are being skewered by the fans, especially considering this is year 4 and the team looks worse than it did in year 1 in some ways.
 

shadowman4

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2002
2,919
1,516
98
I can see my post has created a lot of good debate both for and against our coaching staff and players. I am somewhat surprised there was not more of a back lash towards Mitch Barnhart, since he is the person who made the hire to get our program to the situation we currently reside. I appreciate the feed back and I just want everyone to know that my post was not directed at other fans with opposing views, I really just wanted to see what the pulse of the Big Blue Nation is concerning our football programs struggles. Go Cats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

TBCat

Heisman
Mar 30, 2007
14,317
10,331
0
Joker Phillips got fired after 3 years of sucking. This is currently stoops 4th year of sucking. And he'll most likely get a FIFTH! And you believe there's no difference in stoops treatment and Phillips?
There's a difference but it has nothing to do with race. It has to do with an undeserved contract extension that was created more out of incompetence than anything else. Without that buy out it is basically 100% that Stoops would be gone. Using race as an excuse for everything is intellectually lazy.
 

Chadrock

All-Conference
Jul 12, 2004
2,809
1,831
103
I am sickened by uk football losing every year. That said, I'll sit back and watch real football on Saturdays.
 

shadowman4

All-Conference
Sep 20, 2002
2,919
1,516
98
From here on out how about all replies simply say Yes to keeping. Stoops for year 5 with only having 5 wins this year or No if the cats only secure 5 wins and do not go to a bowl.
 

Coach_Mark_Oops

Redshirt
Nov 30, 2015
42
24
0
First of all do not even come close to labeling me a poser. I have posting on these boards for over 15 years and have over 2000 posts to prove it. Mostly, I just get on and read other people's posts and occasionally I will chime in with comments.
I went to UK from 1968-1972 and have had any where from 2-4 season tickets and a parking pass over this period of time.
I have attended all but one of the Head Football coach charity dinners over the last 8 years and I have been part of the winning bid whereby a group of friends and myself attended a dinner the last 2 years hosted by Mark Stoops and his wife. This year the dinner was held at Mark Stoops personal. Tim Couch has also been one of the paying attendees each of the last two years. This is not a cheap dinner to bid on and win as each of the last 2 years the average cost per couple has been $2250.
I write all this for one reason. I have seen up close and personal just how driven Mark Stops and our entire coaching staff is from attending the private dinners and the Coach sponsored charity events held the last 8 years at various horse farms around Lexington where all the via he's attend and mingle with the BBN fans.
I know some of you will want to bash me but Ican truly feel that this week starts the turn around process. What have we got to lose? We beat New Mexico State, then a bad SC program and we are on our way. The team that I think will give us the most trouble will be Miss. State but we have them at home and by then we will know that 6 wins is doable if we take care of business.
All I am asking is to give this team one more chance and yourselves one more chance to be part of a BIG turn around. We have the facilities in place so now we just need 6 wins and we are on our way.

Who is with me? If not, I just ask you to be respectable so as not to quell the enthusiasm of other UK fans who will be there Saturday to cheer the Cats in to Victory.



You sound like a *****. How does it feel knowing you have wasted thousands of dollars to keep a problem progressing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jon(-24)

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
From here on out how about all replies simply say Yes to keeping. Stoops for year 5 with only having 5 wins this year or No if the cats only secure 5 wins and do not go to a bowl.


As to this year - not only would it be the 5 wins but how we lost the other 5.

Were we competitive? Did we lose a couple of heartbreakers? Was obvious improvement displayed on both sides of the ball?

Retention with only 5 wins this year would have to provide serious examples of the program moving in the right direction on many fronts.

Anything under 5 and he is has got to go.
(unless the 4 wins are vs Bama, GA, TN, and UL - of course then my brain would explode becasue we lost to NMSU and Austin Peay...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woodrow_Call_1998

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
5,396
13,585
78
As to this year - not only would it be the 5 wins but how we lost the other 5.

Were we competitive? Did we lose a couple of heartbreakers? Was obvious improvement displayed on both sides of the ball?

Retention with only 5 wins this year would have to provide serious examples of the program moving in the right direction on many fronts.

Anything under 5 and he is has got to go.
(unless the 4 wins are vs Bama, GA, TN, and UL - of course then my brain would explode becasue we lost to NMSU and Austin Peay...)
This team would have to make major improvements to win 5 games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,978
103,692
78
I knew you couldn't get it , making up bs logic and attributing it to me is about what I expected . One more time I'll hold your hand , even though it's not going to help . Stoops is taking heat because posters are frustrated over a long string of events before Stoops was even coach . They reference Mitch's failures in hiring or the how they've put up with the losing so long and so on . The team is not to blame for all of that and shouldn't be seeing decades of venom spill onto them . You stroll in with championship level idiocracy and fail boat an analogy to Cal with some incoherent ramblings of him not getting credit for his success . The correct analogy would be Cal not getting credit for success prior to him . See how that works ? I didn't think so , let's do a simplified version .

Pre Stoops , no blame Stoops

Pre Cal , no credit Cal
See that bolded part? That is exactly what I said. You have got to be the stupidest son of a b!tch on here to first try and talk down to me and then retort by agreeing with exactly what I said. The best part is how you go on a soapbox rant about fail and comprehension. Just....wow. I don't even think you realize it, that's what makes it even funnier. Go back, reread my post, then go sit in the corner when you realize your idiotic retort was completely and hilariously misguided, and think long and hard before you decide to make another smart *** response showing your ***. How can you even win a debate when you don't even understand what's being said? :joy:
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
See that bolded part? That is exactly what I said. You have got to be the stupidest son of a b!tch on here to first try and talk down to me and then retort by agreeing with exactly what I said. The best part is how you go on a soapbox rant about fail and comprehension. Just....wow. I don't even think you realize it, that's what makes it even funnier. Go back, reread my post, then go sit in the corner when you realize your idiotic retort was completely and hilariously misguided, and think long and hard before you decide to make another smart *** response showing your ***. How can you even win a debate when you don't even understand what's being said? :joy:
Go read your own post again , here I'll bold it for you .

Cal does not get credit for all of his current success either, since clearly it must be a product of his predecessors
.

You are a gigantic touching idiot , nothing you've posted in any thread is remotely sensible . Read it a bunch of times and ponder on it for awhile , no hurry . Let me know when it dawns on you if it ever does .
 

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,978
103,692
78
Go read your own post again , here I'll bold it for you .

Cal does not get credit for all of his current success either, since clearly it must be a product of his predecessors
.

You are a gigantic touching idiot , nothing you've posted in any thread is remotely sensible . Read it a bunch of times and ponder on it for awhile , no hurry . Let me know when it dawns on you if it ever does .
If your dumbass had read my entire post where I said that was what you were saying when you said that the current football team can't be held accountable for the current predicament due to previous regimes' failures and decades of poor football, then perhaps you could have responded with a germane retort.

Therefore, Cal isn't responsible for his current success since according to your moronic football logic the teams are victims or beneficiaries of their predecessors. By that logic Cal clearly is only able to succeed due to the previous foundation set in place, not because he's a great coach. Since we both agree Cal is responsible solely for the current hoops success, it stands to reason that your moronic original point (which is what I initially called you out on) is a load of crap, because Stoops' crappy coaching decisions and the players quitting on the field ARE responsible for 100% of the current issues. Not Bill Curry, not CM Newton, and not Bear Bryant.You inexplicably say no they aren't and to accept the current state of affairs. You're a complete moron, so dumb that I've had to explain it to you three times now.

 
Last edited:

zannmann

Heisman
Feb 17, 2006
23,191
14,781
0
I am sickened by the losing and bad hires by our AD. Also tired of increased ticket prices and no increased productivity on the field.
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
If your dumbass had read my entire post where I said that was what you were saying when you said that the current football team can't be held accountable for the current predicament due to previous regimes' failures and decades of poor football, then perhaps you could have responded with a germane retort.

Therefore, Cal isn't responsible for his current success since according to your moronic football logic the teams are victims or beneficiaries of their predecessors. By that logic Cal clearly is only able to succeed due to the previous foundation set in place, not because he's a great coach. Since we both agree Cal is responsible solely for the current hoops success, it stands to reason that your moronic original point (which is what I initially called you out on) is a load of crap, because Stoops' crappy coaching decisions and the players quitting on the field ARE responsible for 100% of the current issues. Not Bill Curry, not CM Newton, and not Bear Bryant.You inexplicably say no they aren't and to accept the current state of affairs. You're a complete moron, so dumb that I've had to explain it to you three times now.
There's leading a horse to water but not being able to make it drink and there's water boarding an imbecile that still dies of dehydration . Stay bliss and bless your heart
 

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,978
103,692
78
There's leading a horse to water but not being able to make it drink and there's water boarding an imbecile that still dies of dehydration . Stay bliss and bless your heart
Yep, and you're a mule so it sure hasn't been easy trying to drag your *** to water. Glad you were finally able to quench your thirst on my last post.
 

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
5,396
13,585
78
There's leading a horse to water but not being able to make it drink and there's water boarding an imbecile that still dies of dehydration . Stay bliss and bless your heart
I understand your posts and have no dog in your argument. It's not true that everyone is taking it out on stoops because of the past. Stoops is taking a lot of heat mainly because of his mishaps. I wanted stoops to work out, but he has disappointed myself and many others fans. The past is the past, all we can hope for is changing the culture of the program. It sorely reminds people of the past because we're facing the same results. Losing seasons. Factor in that he almost got beat by EKU last year, defensive players told how Kentucky didn't even prepare for Lamar Jackson last year, the second half collapse against USM, Shannon Dawson racking up 520 yards on stoops defense, looking like a sunbelt team against Florida, etc. Stoops teams aren't fundamentally sound, regress as the season goes on, and are now the third best team in our state. He is going to get criticized till he either improves or is fired.
 

4430

Sophomore
Dec 25, 2003
89
143
0
Enough already !
This is our team and I agree that I am sick of the bashing .
I , like everyone , want us to win.
This is not the time to throw our team / coaches "under the bus " .
If you are truly "fed up " ;
Don't renew your tickets next year .
Give your tickets this year to families and kids who want to experience a college game day !
I and my sons will be there tomorrow going on 26 years for ; first and foremost , the opportunity to cheer on " our team " , but , most importantly , father and sons time !
Peace