Toggle sidebar

I bet Trump released this return backchannel

DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
It would be a brilliant counter intel type of move for an agent working in the dark to release this. It wouldn't surprise me if this is his best "looking" return in 25 years and he cherry picked it to release. It serves so many purposes. 1. More deep state fodder. 2. Allows MSNBC to be further exposed for biased and agenda driven outfit they are. 3. Makes that sexy beast Rachel Maddow look like a buffoon as she's been one of his most outspoken political critics. 4. Discredits her, MSNBC, and the tax return arguments all in one. 5. Shows he was "more American" than either Obama or Bernie due to not only how much but also by percentage he paid. 6. Will cast doubt on "insiders" and what they have to share.

I've got 10 more reasons why this theory works. Honestly, after running through the options on this, I don't see how this isn't the case. If not and this were chess, MSNBC just lost their queen to a pawn on move 4.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
DvlDog4WVU said:
It would be a brilliant counter intel type of move for an agent working in the dark to release this. It wouldn't surprise me if this is his best "looking" return in 25 years and he cherry picked it to release. It serves so many purposes. 1. More deep state fodder. 2. Allows MSNBC to be further exposed for biased and agenda driven outfit they are. 3. Makes that sexy beast Rachel Maddow look like a buffoon as she's been one of his most outspoken political critics. 4. Discredits her, MSNBC, and the tax return arguments all in one. 5. Shows he was "more American" than either Obama or Bernie due to not only how much but also by percentage he paid. 6. Will cast doubt on "insiders" and what they have to share.

I've got 10 more reasons why this theory works. Honestly, after running through the options on this, I don't see how this isn't the case. If not and this were chess, MSNBC just lost their queen to a pawn on move 4.
Click to expand...
Man he is just the best. EVER.
 
W

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
WVUCOOPER said:
Man he is just the best. EVER.
Click to expand...

 
R

RichardPeterJohnson

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2010
20,602
120
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
It would be a brilliant counter intel type of move for an agent working in the dark to release this. It wouldn't surprise me if this is his best "looking" return in 25 years and he cherry picked it to release. It serves so many purposes. 1. More deep state fodder. 2. Allows MSNBC to be further exposed for biased and agenda driven outfit they are. 3. Makes that sexy beast Rachel Maddow look like a buffoon as she's been one of his most outspoken political critics. 4. Discredits her, MSNBC, and the tax return arguments all in one. 5. Shows he was "more American" than either Obama or Bernie due to not only how much but also by percentage he paid. 6. Will cast doubt on "insiders" and what they have to share.

I've got 10 more reasons why this theory works. Honestly, after running through the options on this, I don't see how this isn't the case. If not and this were chess, MSNBC just lost their queen to a pawn on move 4.
Click to expand...
That return didn't tell anyone anything. Without the schedules, it is worthless. But your rubes will spin it as some vindication. Until the returns are subpoenaed, this is all speculation-albeit well-grounded.
 
rog1187

rog1187

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
69,756
4,995
113
RichardPeterJohnson said:
That return didn't tell anyone anything. Without the schedules, it is worthless. But your rubes will spin it as some mea culpa. Until the returns are subpoenaed, this is all speculation-albeit well-grounded.
Click to expand...
So your gal Madow and MSNBC fvcked up?
 
R

RichardPeterJohnson

Sophomore
Dec 7, 2010
20,602
120
0
rog1187 said:
So your gal Madow and MSNBC fvcked up?
Click to expand...
No. They reported what they had. Nothing wrong with that. But no much can be drawn from this. I suspect Devil is right. This was probably the best Trump had. Would be telling to see the schedules to see where his money is actually coming from and where it is going.
 
Airport

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
82,081
2,244
113
RichardPeterJohnson said:
No. They reported what they had. Nothing wrong with that. But no much can be drawn from this. I suspect Devil is right. This was probably the best Trump had. Would be telling to see the schedules to see where his money is actually coming from and where it is going.
Click to expand...
You mean like all the money that Mao Obama channeled to the middle east?
 
M

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
RichardPeterJohnson said:
That return didn't tell anyone anything. Without the schedules, it is worthless. But your rubes will spin it as some vindication. Until the returns are subpoenaed, this is all speculation-albeit well-grounded.
Click to expand...

Then why did your rubes attempt to make something of it?
 
M

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
It would be a brilliant counter intel type of move for an agent working in the dark to release this. It wouldn't surprise me if this is his best "looking" return in 25 years and he cherry picked it to release. It serves so many purposes. 1. More deep state fodder. 2. Allows MSNBC to be further exposed for biased and agenda driven outfit they are. 3. Makes that sexy beast Rachel Maddow look like a buffoon as she's been one of his most outspoken political critics. 4. Discredits her, MSNBC, and the tax return arguments all in one. 5. Shows he was "more American" than either Obama or Bernie due to not only how much but also by percentage he paid. 6. Will cast doubt on "insiders" and what they have to share.

I've got 10 more reasons why this theory works. Honestly, after running through the options on this, I don't see how this isn't the case. If not and this were chess, MSNBC just lost their queen to a pawn on move 4.
Click to expand...

After watching Billions last night, I thought the same thing. Why 2005? Who would have had a copy of the first 2 sheets of a 2005 return and not the sheets from other years? If it was an IRS inside leaker, then they would have released a lot more. It was a disgruntled form Trump employee/accountant type, they would have had access to probably more and released more.

I do think too that 2005 would probably be his best looking return from a percentage paid standpoint.
 
DvlDog4WVU

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,764
113
RichardPeterJohnson said:
That return didn't tell anyone anything. Without the schedules, it is worthless. But your rubes will spin it as some vindication. Until the returns are subpoenaed, this is all speculation-albeit well-grounded.
Click to expand...
In the world of public opinion it's a gold mine. In the eyes of someone who understands tax which is about .00000000001% of the population, it says nothing. And check the tweet Dave posted, rubes on your side are trying to spin it into something as well, little do they know they are only making themselves look more ignorant.
 
W

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
Mntneer said:
Because we all know MSNBC lacks an agenda when it comes to Trump.
Click to expand...
Ok? And I'm sure Hannity was fair and balanced last night. I don't know why anyone watches that trash, but they do. And there's money to be made.
 
M

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
WVUCOOPER said:
Ok? And I'm sure Hannity was fair and balanced last night. I don't know why anyone watches that trash, but they do. And there's money to be made.
Click to expand...

We know Hannity plays to his rubes and we know Savage plays to her rubes.

This was as much about stirring up the left into their idiotic frenzy as it was about ratings.
 
B

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
WVUCOOPER said:
Ok? And I'm sure Hannity was fair and balanced last night. I don't know why anyone watches that trash, but they do. And there's money to be made.
Click to expand...
Speaking of Hannity, he just had to use the 'J' word on Maddow just to get his mouth breathing minions fired up.

Hannity: Rachel Maddow Part of NBC's "Corporate Jihad" Against Donald Trump
 
C

countryroads89_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
DvlDog4WVU said:
It wouldn't surprise me if this is his best "looking" return in 25 years and he cherry picked it to release.
I've got 10 more reasons why this theory works. Honestly, after running through the options on this, I don't see how this isn't the case.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you're really on to something there (sarcasm).

"Does anybody really believe that a reporter, who nobody ever heard of, "went to his mailbox" and found my tax returns? @NBCNews FAKE NEWS!" - Trump's tweet this morning at 3:55 am
 
T

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
countryroads89 said:
Yeah, you're really on to something there (sarcasm).

"Does anybody really believe that a reporter, who nobody ever heard of, "went to his mailbox" and found my tax returns? @NBCNews FAKE NEWS!" - Trump's tweet this morning at 3:55 am
Click to expand...

The Donald, as buffoonish as he is, just trolled MSNBC hard. Even at 4am. Another tweet at 7am. I guess he was up before 4.
 
bornaneer

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,216
844
113
Maddcow wants an investigation of why Trump and the Russian met on the tarmacs. She/He just can't accept the facts.
 
Airport

Airport

All-Conference
Dec 12, 2001
82,081
2,244
113
RichardPeterJohnson said:
Exactly. Btw, her show is now beating both CNN and Fox.
Click to expand...


Fox News topped all other basic cable networks in total viewers for the eighth consecutive month, according to Nielsen Research.

In February, Fox earned the top spot by averaging 1.75 million total viewers throughout the broadcast day, compared to 1.15 million for Nickelodeon and 902,000 for Home and Garden Television (HGTV).

In primetime, Fox averaged 2.9 million viewers, a 31 percent increase from February of 2016.



The 21st Century-owned cable news network was also up 39 percent in the key 25-54 demographic that advertisers covet most, with 592,000 total viewers. In total viewers and the key demographic, Fox beat MSNBC and CNN in both categories combined.
Leading the way as the most-watched show in cable was "The O'Reilly Factor," which airs weeknights at 8 p.m. ET. "Tucker Carlson Tonight" was second in cable news and the fifth highest-rated program overall in cable.

Compared to Megyn Kelly's performance as host of "The Kelly File" in February of 2016, Carlson is up 31 percent in total viewers with 3.28 million and is up 55 percent in the key demographic with 695,000 viewers.

Overall, Fox News had 13 of the top 15 programs in cable news.

MSNBC's "The Rachael Maddow Show" and "The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell" were the only non-Fox programs to break the top 15, finishing seventh and 13th, respectively.

February 2017 was the network's 182nd consecutive month as the most-watched cable news channel in total viewers. It was also the network’s highest rated month since November 2016.




LOAD COMMENTS (244)
Sponsored Content
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
RichardPeterJohnson said:
That return didn't tell anyone anything. Without the schedules, it is worthless. But your rubes will spin it as some vindication. Until the returns are subpoenaed, this is all speculation-albeit well-grounded.
Click to expand...

The "rubes" at MSNBC hyped this ALL day. They used an hour's programing to dissect it. Seems to me the "rubes" are at MSNBC for looking so very, very stupid.
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Airport said:
Fox News topped all other basic cable networks in total viewers for the eighth consecutive month, according to Nielsen Research.

In February, Fox earned the top spot by averaging 1.75 million total viewers throughout the broadcast day, compared to 1.15 million for Nickelodeon and 902,000 for Home and Garden Television (HGTV).

In primetime, Fox averaged 2.9 million viewers, a 31 percent increase from February of 2016.



The 21st Century-owned cable news network was also up 39 percent in the key 25-54 demographic that advertisers covet most, with 592,000 total viewers. In total viewers and the key demographic, Fox beat MSNBC and CNN in both categories combined.
Leading the way as the most-watched show in cable was "The O'Reilly Factor," which airs weeknights at 8 p.m. ET. "Tucker Carlson Tonight" was second in cable news and the fifth highest-rated program overall in cable.

Compared to Megyn Kelly's performance as host of "The Kelly File" in February of 2016, Carlson is up 31 percent in total viewers with 3.28 million and is up 55 percent in the key demographic with 695,000 viewers.

Overall, Fox News had 13 of the top 15 programs in cable news.

MSNBC's "The Rachael Maddow Show" and "The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell" were the only non-Fox programs to break the top 15, finishing seventh and 13th, respectively.

February 2017 was the network's 182nd consecutive month as the most-watched cable news channel in total viewers. It was also the network’s highest rated month since November 2016.




LOAD COMMENTS (244)
Sponsored Content
Click to expand...


Don't confuse him with FACTS. He is easily upset and it may well ruin his week, if not his year.
 
O

op2

Senior
Mar 16, 2014
11,213
594
103
I agree that this whole thing may have been orchestrated by Trump. But even if so he didn't put a gun to Rachel Maddow's head and force her misplay the whole thing and then look bad as a result. Trump makes people so crazy that they just can't think straight, which of course only ends up helping Trump.
 
W

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Op2 said:
I agree that this whole thing may have been orchestrated by Trump. But even if so he didn't put a gun to Rachel Maddow's head and force her misplay the whole thing and then look bad as a result. Trump makes people so crazy that they just can't think straight, which of course only ends up helping Trump.
Click to expand...

Agree with you once again OP. She had a 2 page 1040 that gives a broad summary of taxes but not any details. She chose to hype it up. MSNBC hyped it all day. Now they and Maddow look like utter fools and Trump comes out on top. I don't know if he played her or not, but if he did, it was utterly brilliant.

I just don't understand a woman who is supposed to be so intelligent could look at that 1040 and conclude it was worth the hype. It makes zero sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom