I can see how cnn & wapo have brainwashed their followers...

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
lies on top of lies...

their followers just eat this **** up like it's the truth...

and they don't question anything...

cnn & wapo KNOW the Russia/Trump story is over...

so it's time to start NEW fake stories...


Russia cloud settles in over Trump's White House
CNN - ‎1 hour ago‎
Washington (CNN) The Russia "cloud" is growing over President Donald Trump and threatening to wreck another week for the embattled White House as one of his closest allies tries to avoid a public spectacle on Capitol Hill.


DC and Maryland to sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath
Washington Post - ‎2 hours ago‎
Attorneys general for the District of Columbia and the state of Maryland say they will sue President Trump on Monday, alleging that he has violated anti-corruption clauses in the Constitution by accepting millions in payments and benefits from foreign ...


Foreign payments to Trump's businesses are legally permitted, argues Justice Department
Washington Post - ‎Jun 9, 2017‎
The U.S. Department of Justice argued Friday that President Trump's businesses are legally permitted to accept payments from foreign governments while he is in office, and thus Trump is not in violation of a constitutional clause barring the acceptance ...


Bharara says Trump phone calls made him uncomfortable
Washington Post - ‎7 hours ago‎
Preet Bharara, a prominent former U.S. attorney ousted by President Trump, said Sunday that he reported to the Justice Department efforts by the president to “cultivate some kind of relationship” with him, describing phone calls from Trump that made ...


Sessions to be grilled on Comey firing, Russia
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will face questions about the firing of FBI Director James Comey and undeclared meetings with Russian officials at a U.S. Senate hearing on Tuesday, becoming the highest-ranking member of President Trump's Cabinet to testify in the affair.
 
Last edited:

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,558
152
63
lies on top of lies...

their followers just eat this **** up like it's the truth...

and they don't question anything...

cnn & wapo KNOW the Russia/Trump story is over...

so it's time to start NEW fake stories...


Russia cloud settles in over Trump's White House
CNN - ‎1 hour ago‎
Washington (CNN) The Russia "cloud" is growing over President Donald Trump and threatening to wreck another week for the embattled White House as one of his closest allies tries to avoid a public spectacle on Capitol Hill.


DC and Maryland to sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath
Washington Post - ‎2 hours ago‎
Attorneys general for the District of Columbia and the state of Maryland say they will sue President Trump on Monday, alleging that he has violated anti-corruption clauses in the Constitution by accepting millions in payments and benefits from foreign ...


Foreign payments to Trump's businesses are legally permitted, argues Justice Department
Washington Post - ‎Jun 9, 2017‎
The U.S. Department of Justice argued Friday that President Trump's businesses are legally permitted to accept payments from foreign governments while he is in office, and thus Trump is not in violation of a constitutional clause barring the acceptance ...


Bharara says Trump phone calls made him uncomfortable
Washington Post - ‎7 hours ago‎
Preet Bharara, a prominent former U.S. attorney ousted by President Trump, said Sunday that he reported to the Justice Department efforts by the president to “cultivate some kind of relationship” with him, describing phone calls from Trump that made ...


Sessions to be grilled on Comey firing, Russia
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will face questions about the firing of FBI Director James Comey and undeclared meetings with Russian officials at a U.S. Senate hearing on Tuesday, becoming the highest-ranking member of President Trump's Cabinet to testify in the affair.
Which story is not true? 1st story: Trump/Russia investigations will be going on for some time. True. #2 Yep, they're filing suit. True. #3 Actually argues in favor of Trump so I'm not sure why you're hating on that story. #4 You may not like it but Trump makes everyone uncomfortable, even U.S. attorneys before they're fired (for knowing too much about Trump). True. #5 Like it or not (Trump doesn't), Sessions is testifying tomorrow. True. Sorry that reality bites, deal with it.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
Which story is not true? 1st story: Trump/Russia investigations will be going on for some time. True. #2 Yep, they're filing suit. True. #3 Actually argues in favor of Trump so I'm not sure why you're hating on that story. #4 You may not like it but Trump makes everyone uncomfortable, even U.S. attorneys before they're fired (for knowing too much about Trump). True. #5 Like it or not (Trump doesn't), Sessions is testifying tomorrow. True. Sorry that reality bites, deal with it.

1. "Attorney General Jeff Sessions' announcement that he would testify before Senate Russia investigators caught everyone -- including the intelligence committee -- by surprise".

So who knew about it then? This is Trump via Sessions putting it to bed.

2. Non-story, glwt

3. n/a

4. who cares

5. Again, if it's a surprise to the intelligence committee, I guarantee you Trump endorsed, if not ordered, Sessions testifying.
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
1. "Attorney General Jeff Sessions' announcement that he would testify before Senate Russia investigators caught everyone -- including the intelligence committee -- by surprise".

So who knew about it then? This is Trump via Sessions putting it to bed.
lol
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,006
1,931
113
Which story is not true
They're all fake "news" (something not previously known or discovered)

Trump/Russia investigations will be going on for some time.

Sure they can keep investigating, but it's an investigation in search of a fabricated issue. There is no evidence Trump colluded with Russians to steal the election or cover up their involvement in it. None. Fake news

#2 Yep, they're filing suit. True.

Yes they are, but the suit is bogus and will be thrown out for lack of "evidence" something the other claim you made as True is also false.

Actually argues in favor of Trump so I'm not sure why you're hating on that story.

So why is it even news if it's legal?

4 You may not like it but Trump makes everyone uncomfortable,

So do you moe. Again, why is THAT news?

As for Session testifying, he's volunteered to answer questions to clear up any misunderstanding as to why he voluntarily recused himself from the Russia investigations.

It's to avoid any appearance of impropriety. He's not charged with a crime, nor has he committed one. Again, there has been NO EVIDENCE of either collusion or obstruction on the part of Trump or anyone in his administration and yet despite the absence of such evidence after 10 months, Democrats nor the media refuses to let it go.

Disgusting.
 
Last edited:

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,558
152
63
They're all fake "news" (something not previously known or discovered)



Sure they can keep investigating, but it's an investigation in search of a fabricated issue. There is no evidence Trump colluded with russians to steal the election or cover up their involvement in it. None. Fake news



Yes they are, but the suit is bogus and will be thrown out for lack of "evidence" something the other claim you made as True is false.



So why is it even news if it's legal?



So do you moe. Again, why is THAT news?

As for Session testifying, he's volunteered to answer questions to clear up any misunderstanding as to why he voluntarily recused himself from the Russia investigations.

It's to avoid any appearance of impropriety. He's not charged with a crime, nor has he committed one. Again, there has been NO EVIDENCE of either collusion or obstruction on the part of Trump or anyone in his administration and yet despite the absence of such evidence after 10 months, Democrats nor the media refuses to let it go.

Disgusting.
lol smh
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Don't forget the BBC, The WSJ and The Spectator, keep believing it is all a media driven conspiracy against the only honest man in Washington, lol. Did ya read Karl Roves takedown in WSJ ?What a liberal he is, lmfao. Dolt 45.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,006
1,931
113

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Conservatives on here were saying that Comey's testimony doesn't prove anything (when they thought the testimony would hurt Trump), but now they're saying the investigation is done. Not one investigation is finished. Flynn, Page, Stone, Manafort have not testified at all. Mueller hasn't even had a chance to begin yet. Amazing how hell bent you guys are to make this nothing.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,006
1,931
113
Conservatives on here were saying that Comey's testimony doesn't prove anything (when they thought the testimony would hurt Trump), but now they're saying the investigation is done. Not one investigation is finished. Flynn, Page, Stone, Manafort have not testified at all. Mueller hasn't even had a chance to begin yet. Amazing how hell bent you guys are to make this nothing.

Early on most Leftists were thinking Comey would provide the definitive proof of both Trump's "collusion" with Russians, as well as attempts to cover it up.

With that baseless charge essentially vanished, now the Left is trying to create the perception that Comey's testimony settled nothing (when in fact it did and yet still raised other questions) and now the Left is trying to accuse Trump supporters of calling off the dogs from all of this obvious criminality.

It's the craziest thing I've ever seen. Media hysteria over a non existent story that they've created and have no evidence for but insist must be true simply because they refuse to let it go.

Unreal.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Early on most Leftists were thinking Comey would provide the definitive proof of both Trump's "collusion" with Russians, as well as attempts to cover it up.

With that baseless charge essentially vanished, now the Left is trying to create the perception that Comey's testimony settled nothing (when in fact it did and yet still raised other questions) and now the Left is trying to accuse Trump supporters of calling off the dogs from all of this obvious criminality.

It's the craziest thing I've ever seen. Media hysteria over a non existent story that they've created and have no evidence for but insist must be true simply because they refuse to let it go.

Unreal.
No....look in the mirror......now THAT'S the craziest thing you've ever seen
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,761
113
Conservatives on here were saying that Comey's testimony doesn't prove anything (when they thought the testimony would hurt Trump), but now they're saying the investigation is done. Not one investigation is finished. Flynn, Page, Stone, Manafort have not testified at all. Mueller hasn't even had a chance to begin yet. Amazing how hell bent you guys are to make this nothing.
You know, it's funny. The GOP has been trying to schedule Manafort, Stone, Page, et al for weeks now and the Dems keeps blocking it. Why is that?
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,558
152
63
You know, it's funny. The GOP has been trying to schedule Manafort, Stone, Page, et al for weeks now and the Dems keeps blocking it. Why is that?
Repubs run both congressional investigations, when did this happen? I'm trying to keep up but I guess I missed this.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
Conservatives on here were saying that Comey's testimony doesn't prove anything (when they thought the testimony would hurt Trump), but now they're saying the investigation is done. Not one investigation is finished. Flynn, Page, Stone, Manafort have not testified at all. Mueller hasn't even had a chance to begin yet. Amazing how hell bent you guys are to make this nothing.

If they haven't found physical evidence of collusion via some kind of electronic communication by this point... with the leak.. scratch that. deluge of information coming out of this administration AND "deep state", shouldn't we have known about it? Shouldn't someone not say publicly "There's no evidence"? Shouldn't someone be in jail awaiting trial?

Coming upon 1 year the feds have been "investigating", and nada. Testimony don't mean crap if you have nothing of substance.
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,558
152
63
If they haven't found physical evidence of collusion via some kind of electronic communication by this point... with the leak.. scratch that. deluge of information coming out of this administration AND "deep state", shouldn't we have known about it? Shouldn't someone not say publicly "There's no evidence"? Shouldn't someone be in jail awaiting trial?

Coming upon 1 year the feds have been "investigating", and nada. Testimony don't mean crap if you have nothing of substance.
These things take time, sometimes years, try to relax. Mueller has hardly even started.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,692
1,761
113
Repubs run both congressional investigations, when did this happen? I'm trying to keep up but I guess I missed this.
Wasn't it Manafort that said he'd testify whenever but he wanted it open door and on camera? Or am I just dreaming all of that up?
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
These things take time, sometimes years, try to relax. Mueller has hardly even started.

You act like he controls the drones searching through all of the data. I am relaxed. If they haven't found it by now, they aren't going to. Everyone who has spoke on it said there's nothing, so, they'll be nothing.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
You act like he controls the drones searching through all of the data. I am relaxed. If they haven't found it by now, they aren't going to. Everyone who has spoke on it said there's nothing, so, they'll be nothing.
Unless someone flips
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Wasn't it Manafort that said he'd testify whenever but he wanted it open door and on camera? Or am I just dreaming all of that up?
He did, or his lawyer did anyway. I read reports that Schiff was blocking his testimony before the house (conservative source - but politico did say the same via 2 unnamed sources). Didnt see anything about the Senate blocking their testimony though.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
Might want to wait for the special prosecutor that was appointed to be on the job longer than a month
 

WVUCOOPER

Redshirt
Dec 10, 2002
55,555
40
31
If the CIA-backed WaPo hasn't revealed ANY FACTS in 9 months...

it's over...

and you know it...