A grand jury did not indict Tubman, but a Title IX hearing used
a preponderance of evidence as its burden of proof for dismissal.
Good riddance...
Sorry Dude - Dudette, that dog won't fight!!! What did your eyes reveal as Tubman was escorted from that dorm by the "quote victim". What does "common sense" tell you about the" demeanor/body language" of the "victim" as she escorted Mr Tubman from the premises!!
Did the video reveal that said "victim" was under any type of duress as she escorted Mr. Tubman from the 2nd. floor of that dorm to the exit on the 1st floor?
I don't state that Mr Tubman didn't engage in sexual copulation with the purported victim! Perhaps she "had a headache", or was engaged in study & would have preferred to continue with her study! Perhaps her attitude toward engaging in a sexual exercise was less than her thoughts of the need to study but she wasn't so opposed to the idea of sex as to refuse to engage in the act of being a willing participant! The basis for that assumption was demonstrated by her demeanor following the encounter!
Another factor in this whole affair was, Mr Tubman didn't force himself into those premises! The victim had to admit him onto the premises, & again the video does not reveal, (or even offer a HINT), that the victim was in any manner, distressed by what ever took place in her dorm room!!!
Why the "victim" chose to later accuse Mr Tubman of "forced sex" ???????
I don't know, but I'll offer a possible answer. Perhaps the "victim" did not attain a pleasurable climax or did not even attain a climax??????
I know I'll be scorned horribly for such an insensitive comment, not being PC!