Does that mean you are betting the field?That one of teams at or near the bottom of the standings wins the BTT.
I'll take MSU, PUR, MICH, MD, WIS, IOWA, and OSU. You get the other 7. I'll give you 5-1 odds.
Sorry, don't gamble, so I don't do anything but screenname and board ban wagers on this board.
If this was a real bet, you would get at least 50-1.I'll take MSU, PUR, MICH, MD, WIS, IOWA, and OSU. You get the other 7. I'll give you 5-1 odds.
If this was a real bet, you would get at least 50-1.
For that to be a fair bet, Fitz, I would think the odds would have to be closer to 20-1, no?I'll take MSU, PUR, MICH, MD, WIS, IOWA, and OSU. You get the other 7. I'll give you 5-1 odds.
See above.For that to be a fair bet, Fitz, I would think the odds would have to be closer to 20-1, no?
I would take it at 50/1... I think the odds are a touch more than 5/1 but I think quite a bit less than 50. There are still decent teams below the top 7 this year.If this was a real bet, you would get at least 50-1.
The difference in the bet is one bettor is getting ALL 7 teams with the best odds of winning. Even getting all the bottom 7 teams doesn’t move the odds much, because the play in teams have virtually no chance of winning the needed 4 games to win the Tourney. It leaves you will 3 longshot teams, currently Minnesota, Illinois and Rutgers. Teams capable of winning a game, but 3 upsets seem 50-1 unlikely.I would take it at 50/1... I think the odds are a touch more than 5/1 but I think quite a bit less than 50. There are still decent teams below the top 7 this year.
I think Michigan and Illinois were both below 7 and have won it? Could be mistaken though. Illinois was back when it was an 11 team conference.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference_Men's_Basketball_TournamentThe difference in the bet is one bettor is getting ALL 7 teams with the best odds of winning. Even getting all the bottom 7 teams doesn’t move the odds much, because the play in teams have virtually no chance of winning the needed 4 games to win the Tourney. It leaves you will 3 longshot teams, currently Minnesota, Illinois and Rutgers. Teams capable of winning a game, but 3 upsets seem 50-1 unlikely.
I think it would be more difficult this year because they have to beat at least 3 pretty good teams.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ten_Conference_Men's_Basketball_Tournament
So I looked. One team has done it (Michigan as an 8 seed). The Illinois one I was remembering was a runner-up. They are 2 of the 4 seeds >7 that have been a runner-up.
Well I will fake buy 50/1 from you in Monopoly money, 20 for 1000 (I would do it for real but obviously don’t know you and so not gonna settle up)... I think that number is quite a bit off and you’d be selling the tail a fair amount too cheaply.I think it would be more difficult this year because they have to beat at least 3 pretty good teams.
I am out of work, my bets are on hold. Just am not buying that a bottom half team comes out on top this year. Could be wrong as the top teams are not dominate. I like Michigan the best, but for all this talk of the Big Ten being powerful, I find the top teams balanced, dangerous, but we might not have a seed above 2-3.Well I will fake buy 50/1 from you in Monopoly money, 20 for 1000 (I would do it for real but obviously don’t know you and so not gonna settle up)... I think that number is quite a bit off and you’d be selling the tail a fair amount too cheaply.
That one of teams at or near the bottom of the standings wins the BTT.
Ok, enough for one day. Time to hit the water.
I was out enjoying a nice day in the country, when I return to you spamming the board. You realize no one cares but maybe you, I and maybe Fitzphile, correct? To everyone else, bringing up these old threads only reflects badly on you, imo.
And, for the record, I said to Fitzphile "find something where I was wrong about OUR team" Posts like this were not about our team.
But congrats about finding 4 whole threads, of the hundreds of which I was involved in all season, where you found a prediction that wasn't 100% accurate. Wonder how many posts of yours I would find that were inaccurate? You don't have to worry about that, though, since I wouldn't clutter up the board again with that nonsense...
"No way Fitz wins 5 games!" LOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLL
I found four or five in five minutes. Then spent the day trying to fix a leaky pool, install new skimmers, busting arse. Tired and beaten, tomorrow is another day.
Ok, enough for one day. Time to hit the water.
If this is the best you got... pretty weak, IGNORE.
NoFor that to be a fair bet, Fitz, I would think the odds would have to be closer to 20-1, no?