I was not concerned

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0

Wait....so we are to trust the news media now on this report? Hard keeping up when it is or is not "fake news".......
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
No doubt.

He confirmed the meeting occurred, the participants, and the content. His personal opinion was that nothing illegal occurred. Ultimately that is meaningless. He confirmed the relevant facts in the investigation. That is very meaningful.

Let me make this perfectly clear to you, his personal opinion is meaningless. The fact that he confirmed the meeting and content is what any investigator wants.

I know this is deep for you and the other low IQers but his testimony was pretty valuable.
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
He confirmed the meeting occurred, the participants, and the content. His personal opinion was that nothing illegal occurred. Ultimately that is meaningless. He confirmed the relevant facts in the investigation. That is very meaningful.

Let me make this perfectly clear to you, his personal opinion is meaningless. The fact that he confirmed the meeting and content is what any investigator wants.

I know this is deep for you and the other low IQers but his testimony was pretty valuable.

You're wrong again. Stop embarrassing yourself.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Lol, ya found one eh, well then that discounts everybody else! Rally round the Donnie pole! last gasp of the pale, stale male GOP past, somebody better get a post trump game plan to move forward with, I'd hate to think if Democrats had no one to enforce checks and balances like you morons think you want now.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
Lol, ya found one eh, well then that discounts everybody else! Rally round the Donnie pole! last gasp of the pale, stale male GOP past, somebody better get a post trump game plan to move forward with, I'd hate to think if Democrats had no one to enforce checks and balances like you morons think you want now.

Read LTC Hickman's thread.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
These guys have no idea how an investigator would gather and corroborate evidence. His personal opinion may be relevant in the trial as the defense team will call him, but for the investigation this was gold.

:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
How many formal investigations have you completed? I have investigated many white collar cases in case you are curious.

Ok blue's clues. :joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
from the guy who thinks a 45 is the best home defense weapon

Lying again. I never said a 45 is the best primary weapon to defend your home. However it makes a great secondary weapon to transition to if the primary one malfunctions. You are truly an ignorant fool.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,676
6,285
113
How many formal investigations have you completed? I have investigated many white collar cases in case you are curious.

In what capacity? You're in Law enforcement? Corporate attorney? Private investigations (loss prevention) Insurance fraud investigator? Why are we just now hearing of this?

Explain?
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
In what capacity? You're in Law enforcement? Corporate attorney? Private investigations (loss prevention) Insurance fraud investigator? Why are we just now hearing of this?

Explain?

I have worked in both internal audit and corporate security. I have investigated everything from petty crimes to one of the biggest single loan frauds in US history.
 

Shirley Knott

Redshirt
May 26, 2017
12,831
0
0
He confirmed the meeting occurred, the participants, and the content. His personal opinion was that nothing illegal occurred. Ultimately that is meaningless. He confirmed the relevant facts in the investigation. That is very meaningful.

Let me make this perfectly clear to you, his personal opinion is meaningless. The fact that he confirmed the meeting and content is what any investigator wants.

I know this is deep for you and the other low IQers but his testimony was pretty valuable.
Only part of your post I can agree with is that it was his "personal opinion". Any other statement is useless. This hidden investigation in which only Dem questions are allowed and Schiff leaks are coming out is exactly the same_useless, except in smearing the POTUS
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
I have worked in both internal audit and corporate security. I have investigated everything from petty crimes to one of the biggest single loan frauds in US history.

What formal training have you received in investigations ? Outside of accounting.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,331
7,082
113
What formal training have you received in investigations ? Outside of accounting.
Little black girls claiming white boys cut her hair. Oh, that’s right, didn’t happen but he was sure it did
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,676
6,285
113
I have worked in both internal audit and corporate security. I have investigated everything from petty crimes to one of the biggest single loan frauds in US history.

Corporate security doesn't investigate actual "crimes", only breaches or evidence of embezzlement or theft which is then all reported to Law enforcement for potential criminal charges then possible prosecution.

Same with internal audit. It is not the job of auditors to determine criminal intent, or activity. Auditors simply look for missing pieces of documenttion or anomalies in standard accounting procedures to determine if rules were broken or records accounting for financial transactions were altered or deleted. If that evidence is discovered by auditors, it's usually referred to corporate attorneys who report directly to the company auditor or CFO who then determines wheather to prosecute by filing charges or discipline internally by summary dismissal for violations of company policy.

Auditors don't investigate crimes, prosecute or press charges. So you are either lying or you were not very good at your job.
 

eerdoc

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
24,014
26
48
You'd think the President of Urkraine's word would be good enough, but Leftists believe only folks who say what they want to believe.
Even if/when they DO NOT even say it on the unreleased record. The liar Schiff then ad-libs and makes up the story he desires to see read. Only those in attendance know that what is released is inaccurate and only a small portion of that which was said to the contrary.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
Corporate security doesn't investigate actual "crimes", only breaches or evidence of embezzlement or theft which is then all reported to Law enforcement for potential criminal charges then possible prosecution.

Same with internal audit. It is not the job of auditors to determine criminal intent, or activity. Auditors simply look for missing pieces of documenttion or anomalies in standard accounting procedures to determine if rules were broken or records accounting for financial transactions were altered or deleted. If that evidence is discovered by auditors, it's usually referred to corporate attorneys who report directly to the company auditor or CFO who then determines wheather to prosecute by filing charges or discipline internally by summary dismissal for violations of company policy.

Auditors don't investigate crimes, prosecute or press charges. So you are either lying or you were not very good at your job.

Equivalent.
 
Aug 27, 2001
63,466
198
0
Corporate security doesn't investigate actual crimes, only breaches or evidence of embezzlement or theft which is then all reported to Law enforcement for potential criminal charges.

Same with internal audit. It is not the job of auditors to determine criminal intent, or activity. Auditors simply look for missing pieces of documenttion or anomalies in standard accounting procedures to determine if rules were broken or records accounting for financial transactions were altered or deleted. If that evidence is discovered by auditors, it usually referred to corporate attorneys who report directly to the company auditor or CFO who then determines wheather to prosecute by filing charges or discipline internally by summary dismissal for violations of company policy.

Auditors don't prosecute or press charges. So you are either lying or you were not very good at your job.

Hey dog poo for brains......I never said I prosecuted a case. I said I investigated white collar crime. The House is not prosecuting a case either. Lordy you are so ignorant. I still collected evidence to turn over to whomever either our legal department or security. 20 plus years ago I went through the VA State Police interrogation interview technique training.

Who do you think does the internal corporate investigations before law enforcement is contacted?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,266
4,088
113
Hey dog poo for brains......I never said I prosecuted a case. I said I investigated white collar crime. The House is not prosecuting a case either. Lordy you are so ignorant. I still collected evidence to turn over to whomever either our legal department or security. 20 plus years ago I went through the VA State Police interrogation interview technique training.

Who do you think does the internal corporate investigations before law enforcement is contacted?
:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:

FYI It's interview/interrogation not the other way around. Why is that important ?