We've noticed.
I doubt Schiff mentions his name again.
No doubt.
He confirmed the meeting occurred, the participants, and the content. His personal opinion was that nothing illegal occurred. Ultimately that is meaningless. He confirmed the relevant facts in the investigation. That is very meaningful.
Let me make this perfectly clear to you, his personal opinion is meaningless. The fact that he confirmed the meeting and content is what any investigator wants.
I know this is deep for you and the other low IQers but his testimony was pretty valuable.
You're wrong again. Stop embarrassing yourself.
he confirmed the meeting, the participants, and the content. Am I wrong?
he confirmed the meeting, the participants, and the content. Am I wrong?
We should just remember this.....
"I Could Stand In the Middle Of Fifth Avenue And Shoot Somebody And I Wouldn't Lose Any Voters"
Lol, ya found one eh, well then that discounts everybody else! Rally round the Donnie pole! last gasp of the pale, stale male GOP past, somebody better get a post trump game plan to move forward with, I'd hate to think if Democrats had no one to enforce checks and balances like you morons think you want now.
No, you’re not wrong, and he confirmed a quid pro quo.
These guys have no idea how an investigator would gather and corroborate evidence. His personal opinion may be relevant in the trial as the defense team will call him, but for the investigation this was gold.
:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
How many formal investigations have you completed? I have investigated many white collar cases in case you are curious.
Ok blue's clues. :joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:
from the guy who thinks a 45 is the best home defense weapon
How many formal investigations have you completed? I have investigated many white collar cases in case you are curious.
No you haven't.
Flrst time I've ever heard that!
How many formal investigations have you completed? I have investigated many white collar cases in case you are curious.
In what capacity? You're in Law enforcement? Corporate attorney? Private investigations (loss prevention) Insurance fraud investigator? Why are we just now hearing of this?
Explain?
In what capacity? You're in Law enforcement? Corporate attorney? Private investigations (loss prevention) Insurance fraud investigator? Why are we just now hearing of this?
Explain?
In what capacity? You're in Law enforcement? Corporate attorney? Private investigations (loss prevention) Insurance fraud investigator? Why are we just now hearing of this?
Explain?
Only part of your post I can agree with is that it was his "personal opinion". Any other statement is useless. This hidden investigation in which only Dem questions are allowed and Schiff leaks are coming out is exactly the same_useless, except in smearing the POTUSHe confirmed the meeting occurred, the participants, and the content. His personal opinion was that nothing illegal occurred. Ultimately that is meaningless. He confirmed the relevant facts in the investigation. That is very meaningful.
Let me make this perfectly clear to you, his personal opinion is meaningless. The fact that he confirmed the meeting and content is what any investigator wants.
I know this is deep for you and the other low IQers but his testimony was pretty valuable.
I have worked in both internal audit and corporate security. I have investigated everything from petty crimes to one of the biggest single loan frauds in US history.
I to have investigated many white collar crimes. Almost always ends up that improper techniques were used in laundering.How many formal investigations have you completed? I have investigated many white collar cases in case you are curious.
What formal training have you received in investigations ? Outside of accounting.
What he is trying to say is that he perused a few income statements.
What he is trying to say is that he perused a few income statements.
Little black girls claiming white boys cut her hair. Oh, that’s right, didn’t happen but he was sure it didWhat formal training have you received in investigations ? Outside of accounting.
I have worked in both internal audit and corporate security. I have investigated everything from petty crimes to one of the biggest single loan frauds in US history.
Even if/when they DO NOT even say it on the unreleased record. The liar Schiff then ad-libs and makes up the story he desires to see read. Only those in attendance know that what is released is inaccurate and only a small portion of that which was said to the contrary.You'd think the President of Urkraine's word would be good enough, but Leftists believe only folks who say what they want to believe.
Corporate security doesn't investigate actual "crimes", only breaches or evidence of embezzlement or theft which is then all reported to Law enforcement for potential criminal charges then possible prosecution.
Same with internal audit. It is not the job of auditors to determine criminal intent, or activity. Auditors simply look for missing pieces of documenttion or anomalies in standard accounting procedures to determine if rules were broken or records accounting for financial transactions were altered or deleted. If that evidence is discovered by auditors, it's usually referred to corporate attorneys who report directly to the company auditor or CFO who then determines wheather to prosecute by filing charges or discipline internally by summary dismissal for violations of company policy.
Auditors don't investigate crimes, prosecute or press charges. So you are either lying or you were not very good at your job.
Corporate security doesn't investigate actual crimes, only breaches or evidence of embezzlement or theft which is then all reported to Law enforcement for potential criminal charges.
Same with internal audit. It is not the job of auditors to determine criminal intent, or activity. Auditors simply look for missing pieces of documenttion or anomalies in standard accounting procedures to determine if rules were broken or records accounting for financial transactions were altered or deleted. If that evidence is discovered by auditors, it usually referred to corporate attorneys who report directly to the company auditor or CFO who then determines wheather to prosecute by filing charges or discipline internally by summary dismissal for violations of company policy.
Auditors don't prosecute or press charges. So you are either lying or you were not very good at your job.
:joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy:Hey dog poo for brains......I never said I prosecuted a case. I said I investigated white collar crime. The House is not prosecuting a case either. Lordy you are so ignorant. I still collected evidence to turn over to whomever either our legal department or security. 20 plus years ago I went through the VA State Police interrogation interview technique training.
Who do you think does the internal corporate investigations before law enforcement is contacted?