Yea we're the ones bragging about getting blown the hell out.
Let me make a roll laughing face for that delusion!
Laughing smiley face rolls while laughing.
I will say this...
- Thread starter bigblue_07_rivals
- Start date
Yea we're the ones bragging about getting blown the hell out.
Let me make a roll laughing face for that delusion!
Laughing smiley face rolls while laughing.
Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't realize you were technologically deficient. I apologize.
Pumpers be like
ITS A WIN STOOPS DID IT WE GOIN TO A BOWL IN A FEW YEARS .500 WE DOIN IT!!!!!!!
SUPER BIG LAUGHING ROLLEY SMILEY FACE LAUGHING BIG TIME!
The defense does look better. Our offense basically gave up 10 points. 7 on the Boom fumble, and a field goal off the Johnson interception. So essentially, our defense gave up 3 points.
Our offense on the other hand was awful as far as the passing game goes. Johnson HAS to improve.
Our offense on the other hand was awful as far as the passing game goes. Johnson HAS to improve.
So I'm guessing your like Prime and have a hard time reading too. Let me help you out a bit, and TIA that's thanks in advance for the tip.
I AM NOT A BARNEY SUPPORTER, AND I AM NOT PRO STOOPS, OR ANTI STOOPS, I AM PRO UK. I WILL NEVER DEGRADE A WIN, AND I WILL BE CRITICAL OF PISS POOR EFFORT IN LOSSES.
That help you big guy?
Plenty to complain about later. Down Vanderbilt as much as we want, with 10 more points this year they would have had 4 wins coming in. Their d is for real and the Cats O line and running backs more than held their own. The Kentucky defense held Vandy to about the same as the NFL Ready Florida defense did.
Good win.
The concern about 'wanting to see Stoops stay' is irrelevant. There is little chance of a bowl bid, but the players are finally acting like they know something about the game and the effort they need to put in....and that could be a glimmer of hope for whoever the coach is next season.
Good win.
The concern about 'wanting to see Stoops stay' is irrelevant. There is little chance of a bowl bid, but the players are finally acting like they know something about the game and the effort they need to put in....and that could be a glimmer of hope for whoever the coach is next season.
How will fans pointing out positives have anything to do with Stoops being retained. That's pretty poor logic. What you think, or what you write on a message board will have no impact on Stoop's future at UK. If you believe it will, you are living in a fantasy world.
If our AD believes (and he does have minions watching these boards) that our fanbase is happy with a .500 season and scraping by home wins against vandy, he will have no problem continuing his lazy streak and retaining the status quo.
Because you have a positive outlook onour teams performance you win! You will now be tarred and feathered by all the "fans" for the next five weeks on this message board.
Positive comments posted on message boards retain as much value as negative comments posted on message boards.
Ask Matt jones or mark Maggard or brooks Hansen or Matt at the shiver if AD's don't don't have people watching these boards. Trust me, they do. And it gives them a "snapshot" of the feel from our base.
Well we didn't do what we were supposed to do in the Southern Miss game, which do you like better?
First, no I don't trust negative people. Secondly, I don't trust anyone who proclaims "trust me". Thirdly, I don't trust people who say other people told them something factual and then proclaims "trust me".
Lmao every vote counts in this republicMessage boards = revenue...learn something new every day. Here I thought it was about the all might dollar and putting fans in the seats. To learn that my views on this message board carries that much weight with the AD makes me feel...imp: like a mf'n boss!
Most importantly, which you didn't note, you suck. Like, you personally, as a human being. You just suck.
I'm as tired of his negativity as you are. However, I would ask why you are never here to defend the program after a loss?
Let's see....we didn't do what we were supposed to do and lost, or we did do what we were supposed to and won. Did you have a point anywhere in there?
Actually my outlook is the reason why I've been successful in life, and have several understudies (which I'm proud of) who worked through poverty to success themselves.
But hey, I appreciate your derivation and evaluation into my post account.
I love my fans.
Well it seems not everybody was happy with the win tonight so I asked your opinion, is that a problem?
Not at all, sorry, I misinterpreted your wording. It seemed like it was a bait question. Like I said in the game thread I'll take the win however the hell we can get it. A win is a win is a win. The defense seems to be playing more sound, though as I've said on here I'm not convinced it has imprpved by leaps and bounds as some on here think. Missouri has a very good offense. If we can significantly stop them (meaning not the Alabama moral victory) I'll buy in on them. The offense is what it is. We need Barker. Johnson is out there busting his *** and I respect the effort. He simply doesnt have the arm to be the guy we need him to be and criticism of his decision making on passes tonight is completely valid even though it apparently ruffled Stoops' feathers.
So, would you agree that at this stage of the season that an ugly win is better then no win? This is where I am at now.
Without a doubt. We cant afford to lose any of the winnable games we have thanks to the opener. I think we can beat State in two weeks IF the offense can get it together. State (#16) is 6 spots behind Alabama (#10) in total defense nationally currently
The defense didn't allow a TD. What's sad is people like you making comments that don't make sense.
I watch SJ dive for first downs and give up his thin body and I could never say that was putrid. His passing was bad. But, there was more to QB play than just that.
You are right, he did a pretty good job running the ball. So putrid might have been a bit over the top. He has a problem running parallel to the line of scrimmage instead of turning it up field but did get a few key first downs. But a huge aspect of QB play is throwing the ball. And in that game, he failed miserably in that aspect. Vandy should of had at least two more interceptions. And it's painful watching him underthrow just about every pass or throw it behind the receiver. If he can't complete some passes, every team will just load up to stop the run and we will be in major trouble.
Last edited:
He protected the ball better. He ran with more confidence for an SEC game. I suspect it was more of the game plan. But, he seemed a step quicker than he did against USC. I think that shows he is becoming confident in the run aspect. He clearly got gun shy and afraid of the INT in the second half. Vandy has a good defense. He got us a win. He seems about the team. I hope he gets better each week.