Beamer is exactly ONE win better than Spurrier over the same period, he is only three wins ahead of Muschamp, 7 ahead of Holtz (Holtz had 0 wins his whole first season), he isn't exactly lighting up the record book. His big contract is a mark of stupidity on our administration more than it is somehow proof that Beamer is doing great.
I recall myself and plenty of other people talking about their disappointment with Spurrier after four seasons. He had lost at least 5 games every season and was 1-2 in bowl games at that point. He hardly looked like one of the greatest college coaches ever. I guess you and your crowd only remember the 2011 to 2013 seasons. Outside of those three seasons, Spurrier lost at least 5 games every season. Then, Spurrier quit on the team mid season because he lost interest in the team and the job, that is unforgivable in my book.
Beamer is doing well enough for South Carolina right now. Let's see how this season goes with all the hype and then we'll see if he keeps up the pace or if we start hearing about how he needs this or that to take the next step.
Botman - You're getting a bit silly at this point with these lame arguments.
You seem to continue to lose sight of the fact he's the best we've had after 4 seasons - which is exactly where we stand today.
The other coaches you named never had to deal with what Beamer is dealing with and Spurrier-has pointed that fact out more than once.
You need to pick up your game going into the season because you've been very sloppy of late.
I'll highlight these instances when I have time.