Impeachment - is the evidence overwhelming

[rog1187]

or is there a need for more witnesses and documents? Can't have it both ways.

 

[79eer]

Anything that increases the exposure of Schiff and Nadler works.

 

[roadtrasheer]

That's what has been confusing me , to hear the Democrats on here & on the news & all the Democrats in the house the have indisputably evidence, they have no choice but to believe it ...
But now they need more ....they are a joke

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

or is there a need for more witnesses and documents? Can't have it both ways.

It certainly can be both ways. The evidence is overwhelming and it certainly wouldn’t hurt to hear additional testimony. I’m sure none of you trumpers want to take a chance at hearing what Mulvaney or Bolton would have to say.

 

[tOSUGrad90]

 

[Walter Brennaneer]

GOP shoved it up Schiff's, Nadler's, and liberals ***. House didn't do their job...Senate is not obligated to do it for them......or, will they.

 

[moe]

or is there a need for more witnesses and documents? Can't have it both ways.

Of course you can but Repubs won't allow it so Dems will go with what they have. Since Repubs don't care about obstruction (or attempting to tamper with the election), may as well keep obstructing.

 

[bornaneer]

Of course you can but Repubs won't allow it so Dems will go with what they have. Since Repubs don't care about obstruction (or attempting to tamper with the election), may as well keep obstructing.

They should have done everything they needed in the House.....They refused to subpoena Bolton and Mulvaney. They passed the two articles and said they had overwhelming evidence. Looks like they might have jumped the gun by passing the articles before they had the goods.

 

[bamaEER]

It certainly can be both ways. The evidence is overwhelming and it certainly wouldn’t hurt to hear additional testimony. I’m sure none of you trumpers want to take a chance at hearing what Mulvaney or Bolton would have to say.

GOP can't bury this fast enough.

 

[moe]

They should have done everything they needed in the House.....They refused to subpoena Bolton and Mulvaney. They passed the two articles and said they had overwhelming evidence. Looks like they might have jumped the gun by passing the articles before they had the goods.

Why is WH obstruction so hard for your gang to understand? The Dems didn't have months and months to wait on the lower courts and then the Supreme Court to address every document or witness testimony request. Come back with something original. Fortunately there were a few true Americans willing to ignore WH instructions not to testify though most are unemployed now.

 

[79eer]

GOP can't bury this fast enough.

Oh C’mon now, need a little more Schiff & Nadler air time, ........ for good times sake.

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

GOP can't bury this fast enough.

That is exactly their strategy. That’s another reason for no witnesses - no additional incriminating evidence and no additional time spent.

 

[bamaEER]

That is exactly their strategy. That’s another reason for no witnesses - no additional incriminating evidence and no additional time spent.

Perfect.

 

[bornaneer]

Why is WH obstruction so hard for your gang to understand? The Dems didn't have months and months to wait on the lower courts and then the Supreme Court to address every document or witness testimony request. Come back with something original. Fortunately there were a few true Americans willing to ignore WH instructions not to testify though most are unemployed now.

You have no clue about months and months because NO subpoenas were issued. Looks like the plan by the House Dems is working.......just keep saying the same **** 24/7 and and the idiots will come around.

 

[moe]

NO subpoenas were issued.

Totally false, quit lying. I posted this link the other day and here it is again. smh

All of the people who have been subpoenaed so far in House Democrats' impeachment inquiry
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ent-trump-who-has-been-subpoenaed/3912226002/

 

[rog1187]

It certainly can be both ways. The evidence is overwhelming and it certainly wouldn’t hurt to hear additional testimony. I’m sure none of you trumpers want to take a chance at hearing what Mulvaney or Bolton would have to say.

Nope sorry you can't argue it both ways...either you have overwhelming evidence from the House proceedings or there is a need for more evidence to get an answer...can't have it both ways. Unless of course you can talk out of both sides of your mouth like the libtards are doing.

 

[bamaEER]

Nope sorry you can't argue it both ways...either you have overwhelming evidence from the House proceedings or there is a need for more evidence to get an answer...can't have it both ways. Unless of course you can talk out of both sides of your mouth like the libtards are doing.

It's prudent to always be trying to strengthen a case, regardless of how strong your case may be.

 

[rog1187]

It's prudent to always be trying to strengthen a case, regardless of how strong your case may be.

LMAO...okay. Just like it was a national security issue...then Nancy sat on the articles.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

Read the transcript...

 

[Shirley Knott]

Why is WH obstruction so hard for your gang to understand? The Dems didn't have months and months to wait on the lower courts and then the Supreme Court to address every document or witness testimony request. Come back with something original. Fortunately there were a few true Americans willing to ignore WH instructions not to testify though most are unemployed now.

I suppose you are talking about all those witnesses who presumed or assumed they knew what POTUS had said????

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[Archetype XLIV]

I'm sure Schiff moans when he wipes his ***, and if Jerry Nadler were born in ancient Greece, the Spartans would have drowned him.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[30CAT]

The evidence is overwhelming and it certainly wouldn’t hurt to hear additional testimony.

Don't need it. The left says the evidence is overwhelming, so why waste more taxpayer money? No new witnesses or evidence needed, according to the left. The Senate should vote next week.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

I’ll just leave this here:

 

[WVU82_rivals]

 

[Falstaff]

It certainly can be both ways. The evidence is overwhelming and it certainly wouldn’t hurt to hear additional testimony. I’m sure none of you trumpers want to take a chance at hearing what Mulvaney or Bolton would have to say.

This feels like a Tonycried post on the Woodshed.
Maybe it would help if the Dems borrowed Bob Pruetts chicken suit and stood out on the steps