It doesnt matter if Mueller wrote it or not. His job is to find and prosecute crimes. He didnt find a crime. You lost fool.
He did find a crime. He wouldn't prosecute a sitting President.
******** you're slow.
It doesnt matter if Mueller wrote it or not. His job is to find and prosecute crimes. He didnt find a crime. You lost fool.
He did find a crime. He wouldn't prosecute a sitting President.
******** you're slow.
"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence. We all know what it says...".it does not exonerate him."
Was there some words instead of those dots?"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
Sorry you can't answer a simple question - why should we care what happens to him after he's out of office. You started down that road and now you look stupid.lol seriously, why would anyone care about your indifference to something? keep the stupidity coming. Amazingly enough, this isn't about you and your feelings.
Was there some words instead of those dots?
You'll have to look within, I can't help you.Sorry you can't answer a simple question - why should we care what happens to him after he's out of office. You started down that road and now you look stupid.
Because Nancy has said NO....Not going to happen and do you know why ?
What crime? Mueller never said Trump committed a crime......he only inferred that he could not say if Trump did or did not.He did find a crime. He wouldn't prosecute a sitting President.
******** you're slow.
Well, even you agree with that part. You're stuck on the first part.
LOLIt wasn't important to the subject, dang, you're usually better than this.
Mueller did not conclude he committed a crime, nor exonerate him, in regards to obstruction, no matter how many lib fools state Mueller did not charge him because he couldn't indict a sitting president.
Mueller would've been within his rights to state in the report that Trump committed a crime, but could not indict. He chickened out in doing his job. Barr did not.
Yep, nothing to see here.It's like saying "this report does not conclude that the President fuc#s goats it does not exonerate him from doing so."
Yeah but what about when he's out of office...surely that'll mean something...then we got him!It's like saying "this report does not conclude that the President fuc#s goats it does not exonerate him from doing so."
All Presidents are ambassadors for the US for life, imoSorry you can't answer a simple question - why should we care what happens to him after he's out of office. You started down that road and now you look stupid.
You're right, there's nothing in the Mueller report at all. You, Trump and many other wish it would all just go away. That's nice.News flash: There isn't.
You're right, there's nothing in the Mueller report at all. You, Trump and many other wish it would all just go away. That's nice.
The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
https://www.vox.com/2019/4/18/18484965/mueller-report-trump-no-collusion
Of course you don't like the Mueller report. It's ok.Vox, almost as bad as Abramson, or CNN.
The Mueller report’s collusion section is much worse than you think
https://www.vox.com/2019/4/18/18484965/mueller-report-trump-no-collusion
Because when a prosector says he could not fibd a crime the investigation is over and the target is clear. Thats how it works moron. Let me say it slow enough for your retard ***....Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence. We all know what it says...".it does not exonerate him."
In reality you're the one that has been let down by the Mueller Report. Mueller found no stained dress, no break-in, no hush money, no enemies list. There never was a crime. A duly elected president was investigated for a crime that never even existed. In fact, evidence is mounting that the investigation itself was launched on phony grounds.Of course you don't like the Mueller report. It's ok.
Good luck with that theory.In reality you're the one that has been let down by the Mueller Report. Mueller found no stained dress, no break-in, no hush money, no enemies list. There never was a crime. A duly elected president was investigated for a crime that never even existed. In fact, evidence is mounting that the investigation itself was launched on phony grounds.
Good luck with that theory.
In reality you're the one that has been let down by the Mueller Report. Mueller found no stained dress, no break-in, no hush money, no enemies list. There never was a crime. A duly elected president was investigated for a crime that never even existed. In fact, evidence is mounting that the investigation itself was launched on phony grounds.
That is how everyone on this board reacts to your claims of intelligence.
After absorbing a bunch of facts laid out in the Mueller report, the attempts at obstruction reaches the level of "high crimes and misdemeanors" even greater than Nixon. I'm in favor of the House going in that direction regardless of political danger of their own jobs but they have a duty to perform. I don't know if they have the balls to go that way but after some hearings that will be needed to get more facts taking us into the summer months, I hope the Judiciary committee moves in that direction.
Easy as the midterms I would imagine, you did win them didn't ya? lmfao.
He did find a crime. He wouldn't prosecute a sitting President.
******** you're slow.
It won't happen 'cause the Senate Repubs don't care about the rule of law and won't convict him. The goal is to send Trump back to the private sector and the election is the best way to achieve that. The slime revealed in the report won't help him in 2020.
I will still predict the next president will pardon Trump.If Trump isn’t re-elected, he may not return to the private sector. I’d like to see him get free public housing, public meals, public health care for 5-10 years.
Are you saying a crime wasn’t under investigation?OK...can you tell us a crime he committed? Please don't say "obstruction of Justice" because in order to "obstruct justice" a crime must be under investigation.
What's the crime Trump committed, or "obstructed"?