In a previous thread , I discussed the professional rugby requirement for players to wear IMGs to identify dangerous levels of head contact.
A translucent IMG will be employed in the Women's World Cup. The device will glow red when dangerous forces have been detected
I have to believe in the litigious USA , that the availability of these devices will lead to lawsuits if they are not utilized in HS, college or professional football and other contact sports-hockey, lacrosse , boxing or any sport that traditionally uses mouthpieces
I believe the companies that produce them are privately held but would make a good investment if they go public. The yearly turnover in HS and college football should provide sufficient demand. The only problem is which company will develop the " better mousetrap" and dominate the market. The glowing translucent device will likely replace the previous generation of devices and further improvements are inevitable. They might be employed in soccer to record the impact of headers that seem to be a concern in youth soccer
.
A translucent IMG will be employed in the Women's World Cup. The device will glow red when dangerous forces have been detected
I have to believe in the litigious USA , that the availability of these devices will lead to lawsuits if they are not utilized in HS, college or professional football and other contact sports-hockey, lacrosse , boxing or any sport that traditionally uses mouthpieces
I believe the companies that produce them are privately held but would make a good investment if they go public. The yearly turnover in HS and college football should provide sufficient demand. The only problem is which company will develop the " better mousetrap" and dominate the market. The glowing translucent device will likely replace the previous generation of devices and further improvements are inevitable. They might be employed in soccer to record the impact of headers that seem to be a concern in youth soccer
.