Interim AG went to Trump with evidence that Flynn lied about his convos with Russia. Even presented a transcript. Where did this info come from? I doubt very much that a sitting AG would present evidence to Trump about his appointee which was illegally obtained.
Interesting question about Gen. Flynn's firing....
- Thread starter RichardPeterJohnson
- Start date
Trump knew Flynn was in deep with the Ruskies, needed a "fall guy" to throw investigators off the trail of what all the conversations with Putin's gang was all about. That's why they had to get rid of Flynn, because he could spill the beans on the whole operation.
Plausible. At least to the Left.
Oh I do agree with you RPJ...this whole sordid affair is! The only thing we don't know is whose charges are more absurd?
The Left's claiming Trump was working hand-in-hand with Russian subversives to influence the results of the election?
Or Trump's claim that it was in fact the Dems and the Left who bugged his offices to gather up dirt on him working with the Russians, and now have been subsequently leaking information to try and discredit him?
Aren't you anxious to see who's lying or who's telling the Truth RPJ?
We know that Gen Flynn lied about his Russian contacts.
We know that Sessions was less than completely forthcoming about his contacts with Russia-to the point that he recused himself.
We know that Trumplethinskin has claimed he has no business dealings with Russia.
We know that his son has disputed that.
We know that 17 US intel agencies agree that Russia was trying to influence the election and wanted Truump to win.
We know that Trump is the first President in modern history who refuses to release his tax returns.
A lot of smoke here.
On the other side, we know that Breitbart and Mark Levine claim that Trump's pones were tapped.
We know that Clapper says no warrant was issued.
We know that Comey disputes Trump's claim.
No smoke here.
Be patient RPJ, all of your suspicions about Trump, Russians, Flynn, Clapper, Comey, et all will soon be known.
Then we can get on with the business of either impeaching Trump, or watching the Left further disintegrate as their construct is deconstructed by the facts discovered in this case.
I'm actually anxious to see which scenario plays out?
opcorn:He was asked about meeting with Russians in regards to the campaign, which he answered truthfully.
The Democrats, being the shitbags they are, took his answer, spun it, distorted it, and make a big hoopla out of it.
From a questionnaire:
Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., asked: "Several of the President-elect’s nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?"
Sessions responded, in total: "No."
Here it is on video. Yes, he lied. His response was "I did not have communications with the Russians".
That has been proven to be a lie. That is exactly why he wants to go back and amend his testimony, because he knows he has committed perjury.
https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/...=0f7972ef77a4ef001f01bb0db4329dec&action=view
He shouldn't have recused. He bowed to the ******** pressure.
Then again, you didn't seem to have a problem with Lynch meeting with Clinton during the height of the Clinton email investigation. So we know how "un-biased" you are.
I know you don't understand complex thoughts. And if the boards had a "Crayon" setting I'd surely use it, but it's called "Context".
LOL. Lynch and Clinton talked and they admitted it. Sessions talked and lied about it. Great point!
I think it was a smart move to recuse himself and It don't think it had anything to do with political pressure. He was integrally involved in Biff's campaign and should certainly have removed himself from any investigations surrounding it, so this was all about maintaining legal transparency.
Nobody has speculated how the interim AG obtained the info (apparently including a transcript of convos) proving Flynn lied and nobody has explained why she would give illegally obtained info to Trump implicating his nominee. Come on wingnuts, give it your best conspiracy theory.
JAMES CLAPPER: We did not include any evidence in our report, and I say, “our,” that's N.S.A., F.B.I. and C.I.A., with my office, the Director of National Intelligence, that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was no evidence of that included in Our report
No you are not.At least I'm intelligent enough to distinguish when someone is lying.
Isn't this the same Left wing bureaucrat Chick that refused to execute Trump's EO on the enhanced immigration screening?
This ***** biting Babe? I think she's a good place to look to answer your question.
Sally Yates
Isn't this the same Left wing bureaucrat Chick that refused to execute Trump's EO on the enhanced immigration screening?
This ***** biting Babe? I think she's a good place to look to answer your question.
Sally Yates
"***** biting babe"?
I thought you were a Christian?
I am countryroads89. I'm honoring their own radical Leftist self described representations countryroads89. You accusing me of "lying" on them?
What does one have to do with the other? I know you love to try to religion shame people because you are a low intellect troll but where in the Bible does it command not to call people ***** biters?
Dave, that's what they called themselves, and countryroads89 is calling me out for calling them what they called themselves, yet I'm the bad guy?
I guess if I had called them "sweet young girls" I'd be accused of misogyny?
I am countryroads89. I'm honoring their own radical Leftist self described representations countryroads89. You accusing me of "lying" on them?
They don't call each other "***** biters".
Your religion is empty.
Why were they holding up those disgusting signs countryroads89 in front of little kids?
My Religion might be "empty" as you describe, but at least I have some sense of decency and respect for Female genitals. So what's your excuse for those chicks countryroads89?
That one lovely couple held up a sign that read "Babies are useless". Another one proudly displayed a sign that read "kill the little freeloaders".
Now you accuse me of having an empty Religion?
Isaiah 5:20King James Version (KJV)
20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
I think you fit this Bible verse countryroads89.
Your type was called Pharisees in the Bible and Jesus had some words for you. Who are you to judge anyone and why do you always attack the black guy ya racist POS?
My race is irrelevant in this one Dave. countryroads89 accused me of not being an authentic Christian. He/She/it said "my Religion was empty"
So I'm defending myself and my Religion against that charge. It's not "empty", my Religion warns me against the likes of countryroads89 and Women who prefer to kill innocent Babies which is all the "***** protesters" were worried about 'protecting'.
Infanticide
"Do not kill the innocent." –Exodus 23:7
"Rescue those drawn toward death." –Proverbs 24:11-12
countryroads89, since you brought up the charge about my Religion being "empty" I thought you might like to read what God's Word has to say about the main topic of the "***** protestors" (their term)
Abortion
(I know you won't read it, but it's my proof refuting your baseless charge)
http://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-abortion/
Abortion
(I know you won't read it, but it's my proof refuting your baseless charge)
http://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-abortion/
This isn't about abortion. You turn every debate into an argument about abortion.
This is about you not having the decency that a lot of non believers have by showing respect in not calling other people names. And on top of that, your comment was mysoginist.
WVU 82 posted some pix on here countryroads89 the day of the protest that read "This ***** bites back". I'll find them and post them for you in case you don't believe me.
(btw, the Media you so respect somehow never managed to show any of those reviling photos when they reported on the march)
But I will find those pix and post them for you OK countryroads89? Then you can apologize or admit you are once again wrong.
Last edited:
No need to post pics. I misinterpreted your post. I didn't realize that is what you were referring to. My apologies.
