Iran calling Obama and Kerry liars

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
LAUSANNE, Switzerland - Just hours after the announcement of what the United States characterized as a historic agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the country's leading negotiator lashed out at the Obama administration for lying about the details of a tentative framework.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif accused the Obama administration of misleading the American people and Congress in a fact sheet it released following the culmination of negotiations with the Islamic Republic.

Zarif bragged in an earlier press conference with reporters that the United States had tentatively agreed to let it continue the enrichment of uranium, the key component in a nuclear bomb, as well as key nuclear research.

Zarif additionally said Iran would have all nuclear-related sanctions lifted once a final deal is signed and that the country would not be forced to shut down any of its currently operating nuclear installations.

Following a subsequent press conference by Secretary of State John Kerry-and release of a administration fact sheet on Iranian concessions-Zarif lashed out on Twitter over what he dubbed lies.

"The solutions are good for all, as they stand," he tweeted. "There is no need to spin using 'fact sheets' so early on."

Zarif went on to push back against claims by Kerry that the sanctions relief would be implemented in a phased fashion-and only after Iran verifies that it is not conducting any work on the nuclear weapons front.

Zarif, echoing previous comments, said the United States has promised an immediate termination of sanctions.

"Iran/5+1 Statement: 'US will cease the application of ALL nuclear-related secondary economic and financial sanctions.' Is this gradual?" he wrote on Twitter.

He then suggested a correction: "Iran/P5+1 Statement: 'The EU will TERMINATE the implementation of ALL nuclear-related economic and financial sanctions'. How about this?"

The pushback from Iran's chief diplomat follows a pattern of similar accusations by senior Iranian political figures after the announcement of previous agreements.

Following the signing of an interim agreement with Iran aimed at scaling back its nuclear work, Iran accused the United States of lying about details of the agreement.

On Thursday evening, Zarif told reporters the latest agreement allows Iran to keep operating its nuclear program.

"None of those measures" that will move to scale back Iran's program "include closing any of our facilities," Zarif said. "We will continue enriching; we will continue research and development."

"Our heavy water reactor will be modernized and we will continue the Fordow facility," Zarif said. "We will have centrifuges installed in Fordow, but not enriching."

The move to allow Iran to keep centrifuges at Fordow, a controversial onetime military site, has elicited concern that Tehran could ramp up its nuclear work with ease.

Zarif said that once a final agreement is made, "all U.S. nuclear related secondary sanctions will be terminated," he said. "This, I think, would be a major step forward."

Zarif also revealed that Iran will be allowed to sell "enriched uranium" in the international market place and will be "hopefully making some money" from it.
 

Popeer

New member
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
Re: Surprise surprise - Iranian spin for an Iranian audience

The US and European Union will suspend sanctions after IAEA inspectors confirm that Iran has completed its requirements under the deal. United Nations Security Council sanctions will be lifted once Iran completes all actions addressing nuclear concerns. US sanctions related to non-nuclear matters, such as Iran's state-sponsored terrorism, will remain in place. Sanctions will snap back on Iranian violation.

This post was edited on 4/3 11:24 AM by Popeer
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Ouch! French Foreign Minister says that the U.S. caved


French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabuius says his country held out for firmer conditions in the preliminary agreement on Iran's nuclear program. The French foreign minister said they wanted to hold out for more stringent terms but in the end that did not happen - the US delegation caved.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Help me out. Yesterday, Iran could not be trusted. Now today, we are to take what they say as gospel and Obama is a liar?

You certainly are entertaining.
 

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
You're funny

Leading up to this you were railing on Obama for even entering into talks with them at all because they are terrorists and liars and won't comply with anything anyway ... blah blah blah.

Now Iran calls Obama and Kerry liars and they are apparently a totally reputable source in your eyes. Worthy of being quoted.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Re: You're funny

They are terrorists and liars and can't be trusted. But they didn't say that if you like your plan you can keep your plan, right? When two liars make opposing statements, who do you trust? Lol.
 

WhiteTailEER

New member
Jun 17, 2005
11,534
170
0
Apparently you trust the terrorists

You are actually now trusting the previously untrustable terrorist nation since they never said if you like your plan you can keep your plan.

Doesn't matter who it is, if they say something bad about Obama, you're on their side.

Got it.
 

WVPATX

Member
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Re: Apparently you trust the terrorists

I simply made the correct observation that they are both liars. Trusting Iran to keep this deal shows the height of Obama's stupidity. Even the French wanted a tougher deal. The French.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
Re: Apparently you trust the terrorists


But they ALL AGREED in the end (to the framework). Don't agree to a deal and then come out and say you don't like it.
 

moe

Active member
May 29, 2001
32,424
120
63
It would seem to be common sense that one should be careful in accepting as fact statements made today by any of the negotiating countries as each will likely put their spin on things to counter their critics back home.
 

Wolf J. Flywheel

New member
Apr 29, 2014
4,943
1,828
0
The two are not even comparable.

A woman on the rag is far more dangerous than endless plutonium.

This post was edited on 4/3 12:50 PM by Wolf J. Flywheel