Is any in-state school safe for LPT to play?...

Dec 12, 2010
130
98
0
U of L?... Hardly.

WKU?... Not anymore.

EKU?... WELL...

LPT Football: "Paging Brown Mackie College"...

I'm not following the logic here.

UK sucks because they lost twice to WKU? Louisville has lost to WKU twelve times. They've also lost multiple times to EKU.

In the 21st century, Louisville hasn't shown a willingness to play WKU despite games against other in state schools. UK has been willing to play and lost twice. Those WKU teams were good and were fully capable of competing with UofL both years (I didn't say win.) This year's WKU team could very well beat Louisville.

Where is the home/home series with WKU? That was part of Petrino's buyout and there has been no mention of it. Has Louisville bought it out? UofL has had home/home series with MTSU, FIU, etc but can't work it out with a team just down the road? Really, WKU is in the same position that UofL was ten years ago.

Louisville playing WKU would be awesome for football fans in the state and a Brohm homecoming game would be huge.
 

KerryRhodes

Heisman
Dec 15, 2007
149,855
15,877
0
Dont worry your pretty little head field stone.

The Cards will play home, neutral, home with WKU, in football.

They do play home and home in Basketball. Something your kitties wont do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Rager
Jan 20, 2011
191,157
13,249
0
I'm not following the logic here.

Louisville has lost to WKU twelve times.

Why do these people keep coming over here just "making stuff up" on a the reg?

Louisville is 9-1 lifetime against WKU.

Solid post man.

http://www.mcubed.net/ncaaf/series/wk/louis.shtml

Western Kentucky is (1-9) against Louisville

Average score: Western Kentucky 15.5 - Louisville 38.5

Per decade
W L T PFPG PAPG

1990's 0 2 0 20.5 52.0
1980's 0 7 0 13.3 37.7
1970's 1 0 0 21.0 17.0

All games
1998/10/31 Western Kentucky 34 - Louisville 63 L
1990/10/27 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 41 L
1989/11/04 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 55 L
1988/11/12 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 35 L
1986/09/20 Western Kentucky 6 - Louisville 45 L
1985/09/21 Western Kentucky 14 - Louisville 23 L
1984/10/06 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 45 L
1983/09/10 Western Kentucky 22 - Louisville 41 L
1982/09/04 Western Kentucky 10 - Louisville 20 L
1975/09/13 Western Kentucky 21 - Louisville 17 W
 

Louisvillian

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2006
7,715
4,470
0
Why do these people keep coming over here just "making stuff up" on a the reg?

Louisville is 9-1 lifetime against WKU.

Solid post man.

http://www.mcubed.net/ncaaf/series/wk/louis.shtml

Western Kentucky is (1-9) against Louisville

Average score: Western Kentucky 15.5 - Louisville 38.5

Per decade
W
L T PFPG PAPG

1990's 0 2 0 20.5 52.0
1980's 0 7 0 13.3 37.7
1970's 1 0 0 21.0 17.0

All games
1998/10/31 Western Kentucky 34 - Louisville 63 L
1990/10/27 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 41 L
1989/11/04 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 55 L
1988/11/12 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 35 L
1986/09/20 Western Kentucky 6 - Louisville 45 L
1985/09/21 Western Kentucky 14 - Louisville 23 L
1984/10/06 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 45 L
1983/09/10 Western Kentucky 22 - Louisville 41 L
1982/09/04 Western Kentucky 10 - Louisville 20 L
1975/09/13 Western Kentucky 21 - Louisville 17 W
You beat me to it. They definitely are not the sharpest knives in the drawer.
 

Rollem Cards

Heisman
Jul 9, 2001
55,267
13,639
0
Needless to say the uk historian is talking WKU BASKETBALL wins.

BB is all they know, all they WANT to know, and all they THINK they know.

BB is the one and only reason their FB has, does and always will, suck.

Their own conference doesn't give a rat about BB, and is glad uk holds up their end in SOMETHING.

Randall Cobb dogged the uk FB fans until he was paid to shut up.

...................Oh, never mind you Collision Course guys. I got the memo. They are "improved" now. :rolleyes:
 

MDCardsFan

Senior
Sep 21, 2015
696
403
0
If stats doesn't matter, then why even play the game then? NFL teams who DRAFTS this college players, it matters to them.
 

Cue Card

All-American
Mar 7, 2011
11,659
7,155
0
Why do these people keep coming over here just "making stuff up" on a the reg?

Louisville is 9-1 lifetime against WKU.

Solid post man.

http://www.mcubed.net/ncaaf/series/wk/louis.shtml

Western Kentucky is (1-9) against Louisville

Average score: Western Kentucky 15.5 - Louisville 38.5

Per decade
W
L T PFPG PAPG

1990's 0 2 0 20.5 52.0
1980's 0 7 0 13.3 37.7
1970's 1 0 0 21.0 17.0

All games
1998/10/31 Western Kentucky 34 - Louisville 63 L
1990/10/27 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 41 L
1989/11/04 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 55 L
1988/11/12 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 35 L
1986/09/20 Western Kentucky 6 - Louisville 45 L
1985/09/21 Western Kentucky 14 - Louisville 23 L
1984/10/06 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 45 L
1983/09/10 Western Kentucky 22 - Louisville 41 L
1982/09/04 Western Kentucky 10 - Louisville 20 L
1975/09/13 Western Kentucky 21 - Louisville 17 W

Because that's the world we live in now. People spew lies and expect everyone to accept it as truth. There is a lot of mental illness out there going unchecked right now, and people like the troll who posted UofL has lost to WKU 12 times in football is either a bold faced liar and he's mentally ill since those traits seem to go hand in hand.
 

beantowncard

Heisman
Mar 9, 2009
56,248
25,232
82
Statistics don't win games Zipp, results do.

The same Florida team that UK was a dropped TD from beating just drilled Ole Miss that beat Alabama at home. And that means absolutely nothing game to game.

The number 2 schedule? Youve played Clemson and the rest are middle of the pack teams.
As the year goes on we will probably drop. You have to remember that a lot of schools load up on cupcakes early. UL didn't this year, with the exception of Samford. Also, the Houston game is looking better all the time, even though we lost. Meanwhile, LPT has been cupcake city including USRjr, which stinks this year.
 

gocds

Heisman
Jun 12, 2001
19,650
10,092
0
This thread proves my long held belief that debating with uselessakay fans is very similar to "pissing into the wind". They are not only know nothings they are ignorant to a fault. Their knowledge of football is colored by years and years of sucking at the sport and using the 'ole "we are in the $EC argument". NO you only draw a seriously large welfare check from the $EC and that's the extent of your so called membership. It's kinda like being an African American member of a high profile ALL WHITE country club. You are simply tolerated, period and that's too bad and should be totally unacceptable.

GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!! God Bless America!!!
 
Dec 12, 2010
130
98
0
Why do these people keep coming over here just "making stuff up" on a the reg?

Louisville is 9-1 lifetime against WKU.

Solid post man.

http://www.mcubed.net/ncaaf/series/wk/louis.shtml

Western Kentucky is (1-9) against Louisville

Average score: Western Kentucky 15.5 - Louisville 38.5

Per decade
W
L T PFPG PAPG

1990's 0 2 0 20.5 52.0
1980's 0 7 0 13.3 37.7
1970's 1 0 0 21.0 17.0

All games
1998/10/31 Western Kentucky 34 - Louisville 63 L
1990/10/27 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 41 L
1989/11/04 Western Kentucky 7 - Louisville 55 L
1988/11/12 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 35 L
1986/09/20 Western Kentucky 6 - Louisville 45 L
1985/09/21 Western Kentucky 14 - Louisville 23 L
1984/10/06 Western Kentucky 17 - Louisville 45 L
1983/09/10 Western Kentucky 22 - Louisville 41 L
1982/09/04 Western Kentucky 10 - Louisville 20 L
1975/09/13 Western Kentucky 21 - Louisville 17 W

Making stuff up? My source is WKU's media guide. I guess that they wouldn't know.
 
Dec 12, 2010
130
98
0
Dont worry your pretty little head field stone.

The Cards will play home, neutral, home with WKU, in football.

They do play home and home in Basketball. Something your kitties wont do.

Why is basketball relevant? More specifically, how is UK's basketball scheduling relevant to a WKU/UL football series?

When is the football series?

Why has there not been one?

Why will UL schedule home/home series with peers of WKU but not them?

UK did it and paid for it. Is Louisville not willing to chance it?
 

gocds

Heisman
Jun 12, 2001
19,650
10,092
0
Why are you so concerned with UofL's football schedule when your own dumpster fire is beginning to smolder. Don't you have a site where you can go and and attempt to crap all over someone else's football program? I believe it's called Wildcat Liar.

GO CARDS - BEAT EVERYBODY!!! God Bless America!!!
 

PushupMan

All-American
May 29, 2001
168,454
8,698
93
Where is the home/home series with WKU? That was part of Petrino's buyout and there has been no mention of it. Has Louisville bought it out? UofL has had home/home series with MTSU, FIU, etc but can't work it out with a team just down the road? Really, WKU is in the same position that UofL was ten years ago.

Louisville playing WKU would be awesome for football fans in the state and a Brohm homecoming game would be huge.

Cards are booked for 2016 with road games at Marshall and Houston to complete prior home and home series commitments.

We do have a couple open dates for 2017 (Purdue (neutral) and at UK), but need 2 home games. In 2018, we have Alabama (neutral) and UK at home, so we could have one more road game that year.

I could see a UofL-WKU series getting scheduled, but unless Louisville in 2017 and Bowling Green in 2018 works for both schools, it will have to be later.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,402
39,411
113
I'm right here Zipp, haven't gone anywhere.

UK looked like hot garbage against UT and MSU, the Tennessee game was embarrassing.
They just laid down.
Like I said in the summer, Towles has all the tools to be a great QB, but doesn't have it between the ears. I'm afraid the team has lost faith in him too.
 
Jan 20, 2011
191,157
13,249
0
I think UK is better than Louisville this year. I think Louisvilles offense relies heavily on Jackson making something happen, that'll win you some games, but lose some too.

UK has the better QB, RB, WR's and probably O line. Defense's are probably closer to each other than offense is. That's my take and it could be wrong.

I think you don't know what the hell you are talking about.