It sure is for me. Several of the cable stations that are producing new content are online (and most are free) so, for me, it boils down to paying $150/mo for cable & internet mainly to keep the sports channels for college football. Saw recently that ESPN has no plans to go independent and, if they did, they'd have to charge $30/mo to replace revenue from cable. If I could get local stations for free, which is pretty easy, and pay $30/mo for ESPN (and Fox Sports), I'd do that in a heartbeat. Not sure it would save me a bunch of money in the long run as internet service runs, what, $60/mo or so? Mine's all bundled along with a land line (cheaper to bundle the land line than just have 2 services - go figure) so not exactly sure what each costs.
With digital technology, there's no reason the consumer couldn't pick and choose their own package of channels and do away with 90% of the dreck we just have to skip over on the way to a channel we want to watch.
With digital technology, there's no reason the consumer couldn't pick and choose their own package of channels and do away with 90% of the dreck we just have to skip over on the way to a channel we want to watch.