Isn't funny that the same libtards that convicted George Zimmerman before
- Thread starter rog1187
- Start date
Even if it's true, there won't be any evidence unless someone flips on Trump. I think most people know that, and want the conviction in the court of public opinion
Dear leader is the strongest president ever. His magnetic personality brings out the best in everyone he encounters. He has a great brain. His hands are huge. He's the best tweeter ever. He's won 30 club championships. He is an incredible putter. He is loved universally.
He has no clue that Twitter is his enemy. I don't know how he can't at this point.
I'm not convicting anyone without evidence...can't say the same about you and you're ilk.
Blame the environment of instant updates "BREAKING NEWS" that we live in. That plus the fact that the Left really, really, really wants him gone. But I'm with you, I'd like to see the investigations and hearings play out - it took a year and a half for the House to decide there was enough evidence to impeach Nixon, and same with Clinton. Grab the popcorn and enjoy the summer drama.
HAHAHAHAHA.
He and Billy the Real Kid are two mental midgets bragging about their high IQ.
Because he's an imbecile.
I'm no expert, but his disjointed speech, short attention span and everything else seem to suggest some cognitive decline. I had heard him speak any number of times when he was younger and he wasn't always like this.
I'm glad they got an SC involved to investigate...it'll tell us if there is something or if it's all just trumped-up blather.
My opinion is that dropping off Twitter is a direct admission by Trump that it's been a huge mistake.....and every indicator I've seen is that Trump simply never admits mistakes to anyone (including himself).
But what's most surprising to me is what appears to be his serial inability to recognize (or acknowledge) the sheer number of enemies he's made, and to what extent those enemies are willing to go to disintegrate him . His business career has obviously taught him that sufficient legions of lawyers......and once he became a TV star, the amount of bombast coming from his yap.....can solve every problem.
I'm the absolute dumbest guy in the electorate, and even I could see that his atomic steam-roller style couldn't possibly work for him once he starting taking an overnight bag to the WH. Of course, his Staff is telling him the same thing every single day; and he still prefers to blame them (as has been reported) for disloyalty than he is to consider their "wisdom".
I freely admit I'm no Trump guy, and don't mind one bit his attempts to make a fool of himself on a virtually continuous basis. But the reporting of his daily circus is already wearing pretty thin on me personally. I realize some around here believe this to be his master plan; that his enemies will eventually begin to tune out all the crap through repetition and sheer boredom. Guess I've always figured this to be a byproduct of Steve Bannon's "council"
It's working on me; but I'm following the guy from a much greater distance than most, and am still only one vote against.....so I don't count.
And a very wealthy one. I have a inkling what the responses will be to this post....lets see if I'm right.
He sure nuked a lot of people along the way. His biggest mistake were the personal attacks he makes on people and he is now paying the price. As far as his penchant for making outrageous promises and claims.....I didn't believe them during the election process and don't now. He may finally be realizing the reality of being the POTUS.......as all Presidents have done once they take office. My support for him is based on him being elected and I will support him just as I did with President Obama even though I didn't agree with him about many issues.
And I think we both agree that Jack was indeed an Imbecile. Trump has increased his wealth over a long time. Instead of pissing away his nest egg.....he grew it.
How can you be sure?
How do you know he isn't merely saddled with enormous debt?
What is his wealth actually?
I didn't say me....although I will say that if proof is found that his campaign apparatus was discussing campaign strategies with any Russian official.....then i think they're all (including Trump) guilty.....even though I don't think everyone should be criminally charged.
Personally, right now, yes I think the Trump campaign (which includes Trump) was working with Russian officials to coordinate a campaign that used Russian influence. But I don't think there will ever be proof of any of it, unless someone turns snitch
How can that be, considering the latest claim is that Jared was trying to set up communication channels in December?
If they didn't have communication channels in December, how were the plotting and scheming through the election?
Seriously? Didnt Manafort, Flynn, Page, AND Kushner have contact with Russian officials even prior to the campaign beginning?
IF the Kushner thing is true, and IF the action was suspect, it was to establish a back channel to discuss the sanctions going forward without it being subjected to scrutiny. However, I don't think Kushner was making this attempt, and I don't think IF he did make the attempt it was for anything other than a low media exposed back channel (which would make sense with the whole Russian hobblty gobblty gook anyway)
Well if Kushner was seeking communication channels in December which is after the election...how could he have worked with them during the election?
I doubt the same operatives involved in campaign influence would be involved in communications between an elected Trump administration and the official Russian state representatives.....I'm just saying, at least Putin isn't dumb enough to leave a trail so easy to discover. Maybe Trump and his marry band, but not Vlad
Did they? About Trump campaign issues? Or weren't they doing their own things.
Mmmmmm....I don't know now do I? I know they had contact....could be ridiculously benign, could be dangerously sinister.....that's what investigations are for. If yo ask me to call it: they're all guilty ---> impeachment, but I hate the orange, ego stained, fool....so I'm biased as hell. If you ask me to indict, I say there isn't anything that would warrant an indictment. If you ask me to investigate, I say f no that's gonna be a massive headache with no possible positive outcome (either evidence isn't found and Dems still think he's guilty and I didn't do my job, evidence is found and I initiate the impeachment of a President)...either way, someone's gonna be hating on me!
Billy the real kid does it on purpose because he knew you would comment on it. You are literally a puppet.
Again....was this a joke? Based on that freak's criminal history after the Martin shooting, you really believe he didn't instigate that confrontation. But since he killed a black man, lots of people support George,
I said all along that there was no way that Zimmerman would be convicted. Two people really knew what happened, and one of them was dead. They never had the evidence to get a guilty verdict.
I've also said that the special counsel needs to investigate these allegations about Trump. I'll let that play out before I jump to any conclusions.