I browsed the Pitt board the other day. A lot of what they said has been repeated here ad nauseam (bad 3-point numbers, shot-chucker, turnover prone) but there was a consensus that it was a **** team, Capel was a terrible offensive coach and Lowe was forced to play hero ball. They thought he'd be really good in the right system with the right players.
Who knows. I think taking him over the Princeton kid was definitely the right call though.
I didn't know anything about him, so I decided to check his stats from this past year. I picked nine games Pitt played against what I loosely considered "good" teams (i.e. tournament teams generally). I'll list the specific games below. Here's what he averaged against those teams:
Pts: 17.5
Reb: 4.7
Asst: 4.2
TO: 3.2
STL: 1.4
His 3P% seemed to be kind of streaky from game to game, from what I remember, but he seems to be the kind of guy who "gets his shot." Which, I seem to remember many on here worrying about.
I try to remember that he also played on a bad team; that can have a bigger impact on your game than many want to consider - like assists.
He seems like the kind of player that could blossom when surrounded by better overall talent. As with all things, time will tell.
Games I used: Wisconsin, Ohio State, Mississippi St., Duke, Louisville (x2), Clemson, UNC (x2).