So in this post, I don't really disagree with much that you say. I just think your dislike makes you reach sometimes.
I'd agree Roy is a rube and takes on the persona of the fan base. He certainly lied his tail off about the academic scandal....we all agree there.
Where I don't agree is with him being fake. I really think Roy is like that. He's a little bit of rube and buffoon mixed together. Also, despite all those traits....he's a great coach. You don't win like he has just because. Roy's biggest flaw as a coach, IMO, is he only likes to coach one way. He doesn't cater to his strengths and weaknesses. Another flaw is the one we're seeing this year in the media.
I agree with that assessment. I do enjoy Roy bashing with the best of us and I can see how it's viewed as reaching when making statements about his coaching ability. I do think Roy is a good coach but only at his best when he has the certain talent (who are upperclassmen) that fits his system. As you mentioned, he doesn't really adapt to his players strengths, it's the opposite, the players have to adapt to Roys strengths which isn't always successful. I agree Roy has won a lot of games and it's due to being a good coach. You have to recruit well and find players to run his style of play. However, I still stand by my statement that I would take 5 active coaches over Roy.