Jawja, tenn & Vandy are my three perms…

Psycock

Joined Jan 20, 2001
Jan 29, 2022
766
826
93
I like King`s. Knowing our SEC history, they will probably give us Georgia, Florida and Tennessee. Hoping for at least Vandy and Kentucky but may get one of them. Please no Tennessee we see enough orange.
 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
15,063
12,915
113
I like King`s. Knowing our SEC history, they will probably give us Georgia, Florida and Tennessee. Hoping for at least Vandy and Kentucky but may get one of them. Please no Tennessee we see enough orange.

Should be UF, UGA and UT. How it always was in the SEC anyway.
 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
15,063
12,915
113
I think they should do scheduling lottery style every year. Make it an event. Have that lottery machine with those ping pong balls bouncing around (one ball for each program). Each head coach (or designated players) from a school selects 9 balls (their own ball removed, of course). Take bias out of it entirely.
 

Lurker123

All-Conference
May 4, 2020
4,038
3,395
113
I think at least half the conference that isn't those 3 would want them made permanent as well.

Oh yeah. In reality, I'd like UGA, UF, Tennessee. Maybe two of those and someone like vandy or miss st or UK to fill it in.
 

Swifty

Freshman
Jan 21, 2022
99
65
8
I would like Georgia, Florida and Kentucky/Vandy but it won't be that. Georgia takes priority and they will get Florida, Auburn and Tennessee.
Alabama will get Auburn, Tennessee and probably LSU
Florida will get Tennessee, Georgia and LSU.
Auburn will get Alabama, Georgia and whoever they want.
LSU will get Florida, Arkansas and probably Alabama.
Tennessee will get Georgia, Florida and Alabama.
etc
etc
We will get stuck with Texas A&M, Missouri and whoever they need to fill it in with, hopefully Mississippi State.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Thunderstick

Uscg1984

All-Conference
Mar 9, 2006
1,902
2,529
113
I think we'll get UGA (I think UGA will get UF, Auburn, and will drop UT - remember, UGA fans will also want an "easy" game among their permanents as well). I think we'll get UT and either KY or UF unless they just go totally random with our 3rd pick.

It's interesting that they intend for everyone in the SEC to play everybody else at least once every 2 years (and home-and-home every 4 years). That means when you play a road game now, there is no guarantee that team will visit your place the following year.

And with an imbalanced schedule (4 home and 5 aways or vice versa), if SC, UGA, KY, and FL intend to keep our OOC rivalry games, we'll all have to get in sequence so that we play those rivals at home during the years that we play only 4 conference home games.
 

bayrooster

All-American
Aug 21, 2003
14,290
7,031
113
I'd like to think we aren't among the preferred three permanent punching bags for fans of the perennially better teams in the SEC.
 

Harvard Gamecock

All-Conference
May 5, 2014
2,374
2,199
113
I'd like to think we aren't among the preferred three permanent punching bags for fans of the perennially better teams in the SEC.
I live in the Atlanta area, surrounded by UGA fans, and I can attest they view us as nothing more than a penciled in W.
 

Cobie

Sophomore
Jul 2, 2025
243
109
43
I live in the Atlanta area, surrounded by UGA fans, and I can attest they view us as nothing more than a penciled in W.

As they should.

Atlanta metro has always been hotbed for talent and many kids like to stay close to home. UGA has made a nice living just off of this.

They are also reported to be one of the Top 3-5 NIL spenders as well.

Over the last 5 recruting cycles:

UGA:
21 - 5-stars
88 - 4-stars

SC:
3 - 5-stars
39 - 4-stars

Massive talent gap but I would still enjoy having them on the schedule -- if nothing more to serve as a yearly benchmark.
 

bayrooster

All-American
Aug 21, 2003
14,290
7,031
113
You must be thinking of another one. UK hasn't beaten UGA in 15 years. Almost got them last year though.
Yeah... I didn't realize it was that long ago. 2009 and 2006 were their previous wins over UGA. I guess the impact of those games made it seem more recent, much like the rare occassion we manage to get a win against them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cobie

Cobie

Sophomore
Jul 2, 2025
243
109
43
Yeah... I didn't realize it was that long ago. 2009 and 2006 were their previous wins over UGA. I guess the impact of those games made it seem more recent, much like the rare occassion we manage to get a win against them.

Very true. This is why I enjoy playing them. If we happen to pull the upset, it's better than any bowl victory by a longshot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I4CtheFuture

LazyIslander

Joined Aug 2, 2015
Aug 2, 2015
62
63
18
GA's probably will be Auburn, UT and UF due to existing rivalries. So doubtful that SC and GA get paired up.
 

Psycock

Joined Jan 20, 2001
Jan 29, 2022
766
826
93
UGA definitely will get Auburn and Florida. Don`t know about Tennessee. UT will get Bama, Vandy and ? Andy Staples predicts Missouri, Ole Miss and Kentucky for us. Nothing to get excited about there and just because we have capital cities with the same name that is no reason to give us Missouri. If they are going out geographically that far then they should give us Arkansas since we joined the SEC with them. Still hoping for 3 of UGA, UF, UK or Vandy but will be lucky to get 2 of them I guess, hell maybe one if Staples is right.
 

Gradstudent

Joined Feb 11, 2006
Feb 2, 2022
1,311
1,904
113
Vandy, Miss. State, and Kentucky.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: KingWard

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
4,424
4,389
113
AI tells me Missouri, Ole Miss, Kentucky. Another AI gave me Alabama, Georgia, and Tennessee. Yikes!
 

bayrooster

All-American
Aug 21, 2003
14,290
7,031
113
AI tells me Missouri, Ole Miss, Kentucky. Another AI gave me Alabama, Georgia, and Tennessee. Yikes!
Gen AI currently has this problem: when it doesn't have enough information to give you the correct answer it will still give you an answer that sounds plausible, without telling you it didn't have enough info to give you the correct answer. :D
 

Gamecock Jacque

Joined Dec 20, 2020
Jan 30, 2022
4,424
4,389
113
Gen AI currently has this problem: when it doesn't have enough information to give you the correct answer it will still give you an answer that sounds plausible, without telling you it didn't have enough info to give you the correct answer. :D
I guess so. In my quoted post I said a different AI but actually just reran the same AI the same question. Got a totally different answer.