Exactly cause sometimes they bank a 3 in and there’s nothing you could have done about itIn which we still pretend that a point prevented is somehow more or less important than a point scored. Lol clowns
Exactly cause sometimes they bank a 3 in and there’s nothing you could have done about itIn which we still pretend that a point prevented is somehow more or less important than a point scored. Lol clowns
They were fun to watch!I LOVED those teams. Wish more coaches played like that. Recruits would be calling them
No one pretends thatNeed both but its foolish to pretend offense isnt more important. UVA won that natty because they had the #2 ranked offense in the country
I mean, there are two different things being said here.Exactly cause sometimes they bank a 3 in and there’s nothing you could have done about it
Rutgers will always play hard nose D. However, the reason it was such a focus was because we were taking reaches on recruits that weren't exactly known for their offensive skill set. As the talent improves, I'm guessing you'll see our offense improve and the sets become more complex with a reliance on skill.
I mean, there are two different things being said here.
1) we are basically at our ceiling defensively, so our path to improvement is through better offense
2) offense is more important than defense, in general
(1) is obviously correct. (2) is false. If you swapped our offensive and defensive prowess we would be in the exact same place
I mean, there are two different things being said here.
1) we are basically at our ceiling defensively, so our path to improvement is through better offense
2) offense is more important than defense, in general
(1) is obviously correct. (2) is false. If you swapped our offensive and defensive prowess we would be in the exact same place
Oh, you think that Pike would not prefer a better offense with the same defense? lolAmazing how people turned this into an offensive lopsided team vs defensive lopsided team argument.
Jay wright simply said if you’re a team who’s goal to win is to hold a team to a certain amount of points it’s a suboptimal strategy. There are plenty of good defenses out there who also have + offensive strategies and emphasize good offense.
Prefer and actively choosing not to care about it as much as defense are different things.Oh, you think that Pike would not prefer a better offense with the same defense? lol
Im sure he would but what has he done to try to improve our offense? Idk if its tracked but my guess is we have the least amount of movement on offense than 95% of teams in americaOh, you think that Pike would not prefer a better offense with the same defense? lol
Yes, future teams will be much faster and more athletic to turn defense into offense. Paul Cam and Caleb were the 3 ball handlers on the court most and none are fast and get out and runyou can certainly win big with a defensive mind focus, but you need to be consistent in believing that your defense generates your offense IMO.
What we did A LOT this year was get stops and then run a half court offense. Just didn’t make sense to me.
Rutgers needs to build depth and guys that can get out and run in transition. I don’t think our team was well suited for that aside from a couple guys.
And LOL at Jay Wright. Jay made a career off illegally paying players to attend Villanova. The dude calls in retirement when everything becomes legal.
I am sorry, you are just wrong on this. If you want to see intensity, watch the rebound effort players make in the NBA vs college on contested rebounds. It is a war in the NBA, everyone fights for position, everyone boxes out.Maybe intensity is the word I should be using.
Generally, I think college players bring much more intensity on the defensive side than the NBA.
I do recognize the games and seasons are much longer than the NBA…but to me it doesn’t seem like the NBA players bring the same intensity like they used to back when I watched a lot (late 90s through 2000s). Or maybe my perception was off. It does pick up drastically in the playoffs, which I enjoy.
I thought Paul and Cam both at times looked to pass the ball up the court quickly, the problem was, the guys they were passing it up to weren't guys you want taking quick transition 3's or weren't guys who can attack and kick out for 3's.Yes, future teams will be much faster and more athletic to turn defense into offense. Paul Cam and Caleb were the 3 ball handlers on the court most and none are fast and get out and run
Simpson Davis Warren Dylan Ace Griffiths Ndongo all better suited to score in transition
If Paul leaves, the style of play will look much different if we replace him with a quick portal PG to go along with Simpson and DavisI thought Paul and Cam both at times looked to pass the ball up the court quickly, the problem was, the guys they were passing it up to weren't guys you want taking quick transition 3's or weren't guys who can attack and kick out for 3's.
Griffiths sprinting to corners is a game-changer in that regard.
If Simpson can learn to push the ball up the court and make good decisions, also a game changer.
Same if they bring in a mature PG who can shoot and play this style efficiently.
We could be a very different team both personnel and playing style next season.
I'm not looking to criticize Pike. Very good coach. But saying that it only worked in 19 games this year ignores that it did not work in 15 games and had us out in the 1st round of the NIT. The importance of offense in sports these days as compared to decades ago is something to be tangled with.It just doesn’t work anymore. Only worked in 19 games this year for RU. . . .
What should we expect out of Ndongos game? Haven’t seen him but hearing good thingsIf Paul leaves, the style of play will look much different if we replace him with a quick portal PG to go along with Simpson and Davis
Griffiths and Ndongo have ball skills too. They could grab a board and start the transition
Jay Billas was on ESPN 98.7 around noon and poked holes in Jay Wright's theory. He said 21 of the 32 teams in Thursday's games failed to score above 70 points. The level of shooters at the college level is nowhere near that of the pro level, which is why teams put so much emphasis on defense. Also, the rules at the NBA are designed to promote offense. You can't play true zone defense in the NBA like you can at the college level. Defensive 3-seconds does not exist in college, which helps to open up the lane. You're not comparing apples to apples.During halftime or after the UVA game Jay Wright made a point that as Rutgers fans was impossible to ignore.
He said, closely paraphrasing here:
“teams that play defense and try to hold a team to a certain number of points is a style that can't sustain anymore”.
If someone else has the full quote word for word that would be great.
Essentially said the way teams can space and shoot it now it’s just not the way to go.
Ndongo is awesome. He was severely underrated initally, but keeps climbing every time new rankings come out. He will be a 4 star by the time it's done and is already on one site. Looks like a top 100 type playerWhat should we expect out of Ndongos game? Haven’t seen him but hearing good things
We had posters saying we needed to score 70+ to win after Mag. We did that against Nebraska, Minnesota, and Hofstra. Lost all 3Jay Billas was on ESPN 98.7 around noon and poked holes in Jay Wright's theory. He said 21 of the 32 teams in Thursday's games failed to score above 70 points. The level of shooters at the college level is nowhere near that of the pro level, which is why teams put so much emphasis on defense. Also, the rules at the NBA are designed to promote offense. You can't play true zone defense in the NBA like you can at the college level. Defensive 3-seconds does not exist in college, which helps to open up the lane. You're not comparing apples to apples.
I am sorry, you are just wrong on this. If you want to see intensity, watch the rebound effort players make in the NBA vs college on contested rebounds. It is a war in the NBA, everyone fights for position, everyone boxes out.
The reason You think the defensive intensity is is higher in college is because they are doing things that don’t work in the NBA. Take a couple of things Rutgers does on a regular basis. You can’t utilize pressing defenses in the nba because the point guards are too good with the ball and can dribble right though it, and then you have a 5 on 3 mismatch on the other end leading to easy scores. Rutgers also regularly doubles the player with the ball on the perimeter. In NBA, that means that someone is wide open on the court, and they will pass until they find the open man for an uncontested shot. The NBA is predicated on much more intense man to man defense, with much less help and much less double teaming. Even the most elite kids coming out of college do not know how to play adequate man to man defense, which is why they have trouble getting onto the court. Most teams carry 2 to 3 3andD players, whose job is to stand on the 3 point line on offense so the stars have room to operate and an outlet if they need to give the ball up, and to play tough man to man defense on the other end.
And that's just James HardenCan’t tell you how many times I’ve seen NBA guys just be lazy or give up on plays on the defensive side of the ball.
Recruit better players who can create their own shot. Why do you think Simpson saw more playing time. Pike did what he could with what he had on offense.Im sure he would but what has he done to try to improve our offense? Idk if its tracked but my guess is we have the least amount of movement on offense than 95% of teams in america
Rutgers performance on defense was far worse at the end of the season which is a main reasson for losing 15 games.For most of the B1G TEN season the defense was stellar but the offense was mediocre.We had posters saying we needed to score 70+ to win after Mag. We did that against Nebraska, Minnesota, and Hofstra. Lost all 3
This post isn’t apples to apples because Wright wasn’t saying you need to score 70 to win he just said you can’t build a team that has a primary mantra of keeping teams under a certain amount of points as their main plan to win games.Jay Billas was on ESPN 98.7 around noon and poked holes in Jay Wright's theory. He said 21 of the 32 teams in Thursday's games failed to score above 70 points. The level of shooters at the college level is nowhere near that of the pro level, which is why teams put so much emphasis on defense. Also, the rules at the NBA are designed to promote offense. You can't play true zone defense in the NBA like you can at the college level. Defensive 3-seconds does not exist in college, which helps to open up the lane. You're not comparing apples to apples.