That’s not wright commenting on pike.
It’s brown commenting on supposedly wright comments
The tweet includes a direct comment from Wright about what he thought of the Pikiell hire.
![]()
How difficult is it to follow what's going on in a tweet after reading it?. It is obviously a Q&A with an individual ( someone said it was Brown ), who then references a conversation he had with Jay Wright, in which Jay Wright gave his thoughts on the Pikiell hire.
Text in Bold means question, the unbolded text after it means the answer to the question.
It’s brown saying something that he’s saying Wright said. Wright was not interviewed for this story. A fourth grade English class could figure that out
That helps with the IT part a little bit, don't ya think?I don't see that with Jay Wright.
Have seen him over they years at many HS game and he seems genuine and he's always well received by other coaches which is not something you can say about many .
He has two NC rings----walks into the gym and they are immediately noticed.
I don't see that with Jay Wright.
Have seen him over they years at many HS game and he seems genuine and he's always well received by other coaches which is not something you can say about many .
He has a ton of " IT " factor----walks into the gym and is immediately noticed.
On3 Football
How to Watch College Football: TV schedule, start times, streaming info for Week 5 games
The Knight Report
Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Friday Injury Report: Latest Updates ahead of the Indiana game
The Knight Report
Staff Predictions for Rutgers Football versus Indiana
The Knight Report
Rutgers Lands Four-Star Brandon Woodard + Indiana Blackout Game Preview - TKR Pod