I want to take just a minute to correct the perception that it is the same as UK going and taking a recruit from Alabama in basketball. It is no where near the same.
First off, in basketball you have 13 roster spots to fill. In football there is 85. Therein lies a HUGE difference.
Second, the inherit difference between basketball and football in that it is much much easier to upset a team in basketball than it is in football. Alabama has the most talent almost every year and they are rarely upset by a much lesser team. UK has the most talent many years and they often lose several games to much lesser teams. That's just how the games work.
Third, Alabama has enough talent as a basketball state, and there is enough surrounding talent, that they can fill their team roster with some good 4 star guys. Even if they never get one of the 5 star guys they can still be a pretty solid contender in the SEC, and even win the SEC title from time to time. Florida won their two national championships and I don't believe they had a single 5 star player on their roster (IIRC). That likely hasn't happened in football... ever.
Fourth, Kentucky has a tiny tiny amount of football talent. This year we have 1 star recruit (Wills) and then 4 3* recruits. That is what this website considers the D1 "top" talent in Kentucky. On the other hand, Alabama has 20-40 top kids and more than 10 of those are 4 star kids. So, Alabama can get 5-6 of those 4 star guys and they've already made up a solid recruiting class. Last year they had 3 5* recruits from their state and about 10 more 4*s.
Fifth, basketball players that are 5* caliber often help for only a year while 5* guys in football help for at least 3 years.
While one player likely won't make or break us as a team or a program, these type of players are the ones we really need to get 90 percent of the time. Getting guys like Young, Jackson, and Daniel last year was awesome, and they are going to go a long way towards helping us. However, we need to be sure to grab the best players in our state, especially when those players are at big time positions of need. If Wills was a defensive back I wouldn't be as worried about not getting him, or losing him, or never having him, but UK has been traditionally poor on the defensive line, and even worse at tackle. He could have been a huge step towards fixing that problem. I mean, can you really imagine UK being able to take 5* Wills and redshirt him his freshman year behind a senior Leavitt? That would be a mindblowing thing for UK to be able to do. It likely won't be a reality, but it is the type of thing that we need to make happen, and it is easier when these types of recruits come from your own state.