Jedrick Wills coach speaks out on Alabama

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
I didn't think a coach could block a grad student transfer? Honestly that's why it's better as a top recruit to wait as long as possible to pick a school. Just to protect yourself from coaching changes. I doubt any school in the SEC will let a player transfer to the SEC.
Still is wrong especially a 5th yr sr...rule sucks
 

cardsfan53

Junior
Apr 15, 2005
5,659
225
0
Still is wrong especially a 5th yr sr...rule sucks

I like it because it's the only time students have any power from when they sign their LOI. Once they sign guys like Saban or any other coach has 100% control over them. And he knows he has the control and that's why he will block a transfer of a player to whatever school he chooses. Saban might know the kid isn't ever going to see the field, but he will block certain schools just to show he has power and can control their future. They can lie and leave for another job tomorrow without a second thought. Once a kid has done the correct things, worked hard in the classroom, and got their degree they deserve a chance to choose the best position for them.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
He better hope he's happy there because if he decides to transfer Saban may block it. What a d#ck move. I can't see Stoops pulling some crap like that.

Wait a minute, surely you jest. Didn't Saban state on the SEC network that the players come first
It sucks when we finally do have a national top 25 player in our home state it turns out he doesn't seem to be much of a Kentucky football fan. I usually wouldn't care, but the offensive line is a must have and a guy like this would help turn ours from average to good. I understand the respect people have for Saban and Bama. It's well earned. If the kid decides on Bama, odds are he will get the chance to play for a national title during his time playing college football. I wish more of these kids would have the desire to make Kentucky football something worth watching. I get that they want to do the best for their careers. They should think that way. Too bad it doesn't look like Kentucky football is the best fit for him. It's hard to imagine a kid playing in Lexington not really being interested in Kentucky football. I don't know how that even happens. We will live and move on and recruit a guy that does want Kentucky. He won't be rated as high of a prospect, but at least he wants Kentucky. I'm confident that when we do start winning more games and going to bowl games, losing our elite prospects to Bama or anybody else won't happen. This commitment to Kentucky would have meant a lot more to us Kentucky fans than what it will to Bama fans. They have a roster full of these guys. I do believe we have the coach to turn things around, but while it is underway, it sucks to lose a talent like this kid and then have to play against him in the Sec.

MUCH bigger impact at UK than Bama, just the influence on recruiting alone might make it a bigger impact. MUCH bigger hero here, and MUCH more opportunities in the state IF he gets injured and doesn't play or something else unexpected happens.

Didn't Bama have a really good performance from the most important player on the field when they won the NC, and aren't they also losing the Heisman trophy? Where are they ranked preseason? If he does go elsewhere or flames out they will just plug another five star in his position and he will be forgotten in short order.
 

*Bleedingblue*

Heisman
Mar 5, 2009
39,604
30,454
113
Over the years we have lost some high profile recruits ie. Hornung, Kurt Barber, Frank Jacobs, Lamar Dawson , Damien Haris etc. But have kept Tim Couch, Dennis Johnson, Andre Woodson, Micah Johnson, and of course Landon Young and Drake Jackson. We have done pretty good with our higher profile recruits staying home.


We have also lost out on quite a few to our in state rival as well. Looking back over the years I'd say that we have lost on just as many as we have gotten. Some we don't even try to recruit because we know they are not coming. Like the Brohm's for example or Bush.
 
Jul 26, 2003
21,180
11,161
0
So, what made guys like Couch, Towles, Barker, Young, Jackson, Daniel, Johnson, etc pick UK over bigger programs unlike guys like Harris, Alexander, Wills, etc? Why would some 5 star Kentucky guys pass on a program that wins most of its games, academic reputation, playing with higher rated recruits, etc? Is the bottom line some just have too much pride of where they are from to leave and are more concerned of helping their state university? What are the differences between Young's mind set of where he should go versus Wills?
 
Sep 27, 2015
15,082
25,154
98
Exactly. Some want to be the hometown hero or have their school in their hearts or want the early PT

Harris lied and played attention *****. I actually hope he pays some price via karma for that.

Wills is just not interested, and that's ok. I won't hate him for it but I also won't wish him well or watch him progress at Alabama just because he is in state. Simply put, he doesn't care about his state one way or the other so his state should not care about him. Good luck. That is all
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
We have also lost out on quite a few to our in state rival as well. Looking back over the years I'd say that we have lost on just as many as we have gotten. Some we don't even try to recruit because we know they are not coming. Like the Brohm's for example or Bush.
UK recruited both Brian Brohm and Michael Bush...some folks were even dreaming uk had a shot at
So, what made guys like Couch, Towles, Barker, Young, Jackson, Daniel, Johnson, etc pick UK over bigger programs unlike guys like Harris, Alexander, Wills, etc? Why would some 5 star Kentucky guys pass on a program that wins most of its games, academic reputation, playing with higher rated recruits, etc? Is the bottom line some just have too much pride of where they are from to leave and are more concerned of helping their state university? What are the differences between Young's mind set of where he should go versus Wills?
Love for the name across the chest...bleeding blue
 

Stenchymouse

All-American
Jul 31, 2005
12,633
6,219
113
We can ALL make all the excuses and reasonings we want, but let's be honest and realistic with this...IT IS A HUGE LOSS for the program if nothing more than from an image stand point...the program will very seldom have a shot recruit a kid of this caliber especially one from the state in your backdoor
When previous coaches were here, they were pulling classes ranked in the 50's and 60's...

Stoops has consistently been pulling classes around 30, so while it would be a huge boost and a huge bonus to get Wills, it's not a huge "loss".

We never had him to lose...

Stoops will still pull a top 30 class and that's good enough to win if we avoid attrition and the kids are coached properly.

Continuity within the coaching staff is the most important thing at this point when it comes to getting us to the next level IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rudd1

greginky1957

All-Conference
Oct 10, 2008
2,387
3,080
113
I think that if Wills does end up at Bama that it is a big loss if for no other reason than perception to other future recruits. I believe we can overcome his loss on the field, but it would still sting to lose him. Having said that February 3rd is a long way off. Maybe if we can have a terrific season of at least 7 regular season victories then we can flip him back, maybe not. Only time will tell. It really is hard for me to condem him ending up at Bama, but if he does go there then there is no way i could ever root for him. At Bama he could possibly get recruited over, here, that would not happen. I cannot root for any Kentucky kid going to Bama or any other school. I wish him no ill will, he will just be another opponent as far as i am concerned.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
When previous coaches were here, they were pulling classes ranked in the 50's and 60's...

Stoops has consistently been pulling classes around 30, so while it would be a huge boost and a huge bonus to get Wills, it's not a huge "loss".

We never had him to lose...

Stoops will still pull a top 30 class and that's good enough to win if we avoid attrition and the kids are coached properly.

Continuity within the coaching staff is the most important thing at this point when it comes to getting us to the next level IMO.
With all due respect and like I said... No program like Kentucky's ca not lose a five-star Prospect in their own back door and it not be a tremendous loss to the program to not get the kid to stay at home... and I completely understand that the kid is doing it the right way but it still is not good even from just a perception standpoint
 

DA23_rox

Redshirt
Apr 2, 2007
12,754
12
0
So, what made guys like Couch, Towles, Barker, Young, Jackson, Daniel, Johnson, etc pick UK over bigger programs unlike guys like Harris, Alexander, Wills, etc? Why would some 5 star Kentucky guys pass on a program that wins most of its games, academic reputation, playing with higher rated recruits, etc? Is the bottom line some just have too much pride of where they are from to leave and are more concerned of helping their state university? What are the differences between Young's mind set of where he should go versus Wills?

I'm not a 5 star recruit, but living in Indiana, there is no way I would have ended up at any of these state schools. I've lived in northern Indiana my whole life. I would leave this state to play football in a heartbeat. Not everyone wants to play for Homestate U and there is no logical reason some times. That's why I don't get people who say about Ohio kids "if OSU offers, we lose him." That's not always true.

Another issue is he's from this city. Some times people want to get away from home to grow up. Maybe if he were from Bowling Green, it would be different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cookscats

Stenchymouse

All-American
Jul 31, 2005
12,633
6,219
113
With all due respect and like I said... No program like Kentucky's ca not lose a five-star Prospect in their own back door and it not be a tremendous loss to the program to not get the kid to stay at home... and I completely understand that the kid is doing it the right way but it still is not good even from just a perception standpoint
UK would LOVE LOVE LOVE to have him!!

My point is that the trajectory of the program remains the same.

When someone usually thinks of a "loss" it's means "drop off" and that's not the case.

We're kind of splitting hairs here but my enthusiasm is high and Wills lack of commitment to UK won't change that.

I don't want to feel a letdown about losing something we never had.

BTW...I absolutely understand your point, I just choose to look at it differently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rudd1

JHB4UK

Heisman
May 29, 2001
31,836
11,258
0
Completely understandable for a high school kid to not have the perspective of thinking about life after football, after college, after (hopefully) a pro career.

But they should - and so should their families, & their HS coaches

Yeah a guy like Wills can go anywhere in the country, & likely be successful. However, he can't come back home afterwards, just can't. Of course you know what I am saying, they can move back here.....but it will be in anonymity and noone is gonna bend over backwards to help them out with post-football career opportunities.

Guys who stay home & strap on the blue & white hold a special place in this states heart no matter how their careers turn out. Maybe the folks out in southern cal will take care of Lamar Dawson after his injury plagued career, maybe not....but I know for sure the good people of the Big Blue Nation would have done so if he came here instead.

There is a reason Tim Couch is still so beloved & embraced by the fans & community. and Lorenzen. And Tamme. Burton. Cory Peters. on & on & on.
 

Comebakatz3

Heisman
Aug 8, 2008
41,308
31,303
113
I want to take just a minute to correct the perception that it is the same as UK going and taking a recruit from Alabama in basketball. It is no where near the same.

First off, in basketball you have 13 roster spots to fill. In football there is 85. Therein lies a HUGE difference.

Second, the inherit difference between basketball and football in that it is much much easier to upset a team in basketball than it is in football. Alabama has the most talent almost every year and they are rarely upset by a much lesser team. UK has the most talent many years and they often lose several games to much lesser teams. That's just how the games work.

Third, Alabama has enough talent as a basketball state, and there is enough surrounding talent, that they can fill their team roster with some good 4 star guys. Even if they never get one of the 5 star guys they can still be a pretty solid contender in the SEC, and even win the SEC title from time to time. Florida won their two national championships and I don't believe they had a single 5 star player on their roster (IIRC). That likely hasn't happened in football... ever.

Fourth, Kentucky has a tiny tiny amount of football talent. This year we have 1 star recruit (Wills) and then 4 3* recruits. That is what this website considers the D1 "top" talent in Kentucky. On the other hand, Alabama has 20-40 top kids and more than 10 of those are 4 star kids. So, Alabama can get 5-6 of those 4 star guys and they've already made up a solid recruiting class. Last year they had 3 5* recruits from their state and about 10 more 4*s.

Fifth, basketball players that are 5* caliber often help for only a year while 5* guys in football help for at least 3 years.

While one player likely won't make or break us as a team or a program, these type of players are the ones we really need to get 90 percent of the time. Getting guys like Young, Jackson, and Daniel last year was awesome, and they are going to go a long way towards helping us. However, we need to be sure to grab the best players in our state, especially when those players are at big time positions of need. If Wills was a defensive back I wouldn't be as worried about not getting him, or losing him, or never having him, but UK has been traditionally poor on the defensive line, and even worse at tackle. He could have been a huge step towards fixing that problem. I mean, can you really imagine UK being able to take 5* Wills and redshirt him his freshman year behind a senior Leavitt? That would be a mindblowing thing for UK to be able to do. It likely won't be a reality, but it is the type of thing that we need to make happen, and it is easier when these types of recruits come from your own state.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
I want to take just a minute to correct the perception that it is the same as UK going and taking a recruit from Alabama in basketball. It is no where near the same.

First off, in basketball you have 13 roster spots to fill. In football there is 85. Therein lies a HUGE difference.

Second, the inherit difference between basketball and football in that it is much much easier to upset a team in basketball than it is in football. Alabama has the most talent almost every year and they are rarely upset by a much lesser team. UK has the most talent many years and they often lose several games to much lesser teams. That's just how the games work.

Third, Alabama has enough talent as a basketball state, and there is enough surrounding talent, that they can fill their team roster with some good 4 star guys. Even if they never get one of the 5 star guys they can still be a pretty solid contender in the SEC, and even win the SEC title from time to time. Florida won their two national championships and I don't believe they had a single 5 star player on their roster (IIRC). That likely hasn't happened in football... ever.

Fourth, Kentucky has a tiny tiny amount of football talent. This year we have 1 star recruit (Wills) and then 4 3* recruits. That is what this website considers the D1 "top" talent in Kentucky. On the other hand, Alabama has 20-40 top kids and more than 10 of those are 4 star kids. So, Alabama can get 5-6 of those 4 star guys and they've already made up a solid recruiting class. Last year they had 3 5* recruits from their state and about 10 more 4*s.

Fifth, basketball players that are 5* caliber often help for only a year while 5* guys in football help for at least 3 years.

While one player likely won't make or break us as a team or a program, these type of players are the ones we really need to get 90 percent of the time. Getting guys like Young, Jackson, and Daniel last year was awesome, and they are going to go a long way towards helping us. However, we need to be sure to grab the best players in our state, especially when those players are at big time positions of need. If Wills was a defensive back I wouldn't be as worried about not getting him, or losing him, or never having him, but UK has been traditionally poor on the defensive line, and even worse at tackle. He could have been a huge step towards fixing that problem. I mean, can you really imagine UK being able to take 5* Wills and redshirt him his freshman year behind a senior Leavitt? That would be a mindblowing thing for UK to be able to do. It likely won't be a reality, but it is the type of thing that we need to make happen, and it is easier when these types of recruits come from your own state.
Are you sure Ala produces that kind of talent in football...I am not so sure they do.********* did a little research of my own and you are basically correct... For a state that only has the same population as the state of Kentucky they produce an extra amount of top-tier talent... not like Florida, California, Texas and several other states but excellent based on their population
 
Last edited:

bratboy

All-Conference
Dec 19, 2014
1,552
2,319
0
If Wills ends up at bama as projected, hope he along with Harris become part of the decline of Sabans dominance of the SEC!
I see 2-3 losses this season and no shot at a playoff birth.
I see LSU vs Tennessee playing for the SEC crown.
Not personal toward the young men, it's they're choice but really don't like bama or Saban!
 

Comebakatz3

Heisman
Aug 8, 2008
41,308
31,303
113
Are you sure Ala produces that kind of talent in football...I am not so sure they do.********* did a little research of my own and you are basically correct... For a state that only has the same population as the state of Kentucky they produce an extra amount of top-tier talent... not like Florida, California, Texas and several other states but excellent based on their population

Yea, their talent level in the state seems to fluctuate, but they still have a good chunk of 4 star talent that they can at least make a very solid recruiting base off of. Then they can go out and fill the holes with the best in the country. UK, on the other hand, has to fill their roster with out of state talent, and it is much harder to get the big time out of state talent to head to a place with very little football tradition. That's why it is really important that we keep the best talent in the state.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,131
10,892
113
I can just hear Saban calling him to threaten his scholarship opportunity now.