I said basically this same thing in another thread. Great post.Pretty fair critique....
1. Cal had some major talent that he could draw (until Duke jumped into 1 and done)
2. But Cal, to me, can develop players when he tried to. If he could get guys to stay for a few years....they were better. PJ Washington jump in year 2, Nick Richards, Derek Willis was a good stretch 4, etc... It's just that he got so enamored with getting guys out to NBA so fast and getting the next 5 star kid that overrecruited current kids...he failed to keep some that needed an extra year (Diallo, Keldon Johnson, etc..)
3. Cal's defensive strategy with the athletes was really good when he got it dialed in. Athletes, switching on ball screens, funnel to shot blockers, etc.... But once the talent level dropped (i.e. Duke jumping into 1 and done pond)...>Cal's coaching of hedging ball screens, trap ball screens, cheat back into lane on drive and kick, etc... got worse and worse.
4. And finally....and biggest issue....he lost Robich, who was the main teacher of concepts. And guys like Welsh was a good offensive uptick, but Payne, Bruiser, Barbee, etc....were just way less teachers than Robich.
I said basically this same thing in another thread. Great post.
For those that didn't read what Teague said, basically he said Cal won because they had hella talent, even in 2012. He told marques they would win because they were talented but the x/o was a$$.
yup, but if you have all that talent, your going to win 2 of those 11 times like he did on talent alone possibly lol... or in Cal's case 1 of 7. I know for sure he should have won in 2015. Deer God that team was so loaded, granted refs definitely seemed on the take in the Wisconsin game but no team should have ever been close enough for it to matter and we still had a shot to win anyway.If all that mattered was talent when winning championships then Dean Smith wouldn’t have lost 9 out of 11 times he went to the Final Four.
Jeff and Cal both told Marquis he wasn’t ready and to return. Don’t rush.Jeff Teague is the reason Marquis didn’t come back when he was told he needed to and would greatly improve his draft stock and his ability to stick in the league with another year.
Cal and Smith won all their championships in the Superdome. Cal won his normal-by winning. Smith's 2 championships were decided by a man throwing the ball to other team (Fred Brown to Worthy) and Chris Webber taking a timeout they didn't have. Think of all the talent/loaded teams and favorable paths to the Final Four and Dean Smith's 2 championships were decided on 2 of the most notable plays in NCAA History.If all that mattered was talent when winning championships then Dean Smith wouldn’t have lost 9 out of 11 times he went to the Final Four.
Yep. Plenty of other coaches have also stated that UK was one of if not THE easiest team to prepare against bc you knew exactly what they were going to do. …..just came down to it the other team had the talent/athletes to match it.Cal knows only one way to play and that bites him in close games, tournament play, etc. As far as I can tell, doesn't spend much/any time on fundamentals as his teams rarely look better coached as the season wore on. Once in a blue moon will play a zone even if the opponent sucks at shooting 3s and are beating the guards to the hole every trip down the floor. His teams look completely lost as to how to beat a zone, also. If he has an out of bounds play other than throw the ball from under the basket to the corner or way out beyond the 3, I've yet to see it. Even after the SJU game, he told the interviewer that he'd told his team to 'figure it out', which begs the question why are you making multiple millions to COACH if your players have to 'figure it out'?
With the talent that came through UK, any mediocre coach could have won 20+ games and an NCAA game here and there. We just consistently had significantly better players year after year. But, in crunch time, in tight NCAA games, in games where the team just isn't hitting their shots, Cal had nothing. No change in strategy. No diagrammed plays to break someone free. No change in defenses to upset the opponent's rhythm. Nothing. Just 'Go', 'Run', 'Dribble/Drive'.
I didn't see anything Teague said that wasn't correct.
K_Time, you know your stuff!Pretty fair critique....
1. Cal had some major talent that he could draw (until Duke jumped into 1 and done)
2. But Cal, to me, can develop players when he tried to. If he could get guys to stay for a few years....they were better. PJ Washington jump in year 2, Nick Richards, Derek Willis was a good stretch 4, etc... It's just that he got so enamored with getting guys out to NBA so fast and getting the next 5 star kid that overrecruited current kids...he failed to keep some that needed an extra year (Diallo, Keldon Johnson, etc..)
3. Cal's defensive strategy with the athletes was really good when he got it dialed in. Athletes, switching on ball screens, funnel to shot blockers, etc.... But once the talent level dropped (i.e. Duke jumping into 1 and done pond)...>Cal's coaching of hedging ball screens, trap ball screens, cheat back into lane on drive and kick, etc... got worse and worse.
4. And finally....and biggest issue....he lost Robich, who was the main teacher of concepts. And guys like Welsh was a good offensive uptick, but Payne, Bruiser, Barbee, etc....were just way less teachers than Robich.
To add to your #2...Pretty fair critique....
1. Cal had some major talent that he could draw (until Duke jumped into 1 and done)
2. But Cal, to me, can develop players when he tried to. If he could get guys to stay for a few years....they were better. PJ Washington jump in year 2, Nick Richards, Derek Willis was a good stretch 4, etc... It's just that he got so enamored with getting guys out to NBA so fast and getting the next 5 star kid that overrecruited current kids...he failed to keep some that needed an extra year (Diallo, Keldon Johnson, etc..)
3. Cal's defensive strategy with the athletes was really good when he got it dialed in. Athletes, switching on ball screens, funnel to shot blockers, etc.... But once the talent level dropped (i.e. Duke jumping into 1 and done pond)...>Cal's coaching of hedging ball screens, trap ball screens, cheat back into lane on drive and kick, etc... got worse and worse.
4. And finally....and biggest issue....he lost Robich, who was the main teacher of concepts. And guys like Welsh was a good offensive uptick, but Payne, Bruiser, Barbee, etc....were just way less teachers than Robich.
I agree wholeheartedly, but the culture was created that if you hadn't developed enough in your one season you were seen as a failure. Most of the faux one and dones were also recruited over so they ran the risk of losing their PT and looking even worse. You couldn't blame them really.Are you guys suggesting Cal wasted talent?
Never made the connection.
The culture he had built where TyTy ran off to the league like he was John Wall took away Cals talent advantage and exposed his lack of coaching. The true one and done talent didn't destroy Cal. The faux one and dones did.
Yeah his style of play, more than most others is reliant SO MUCH on this one factor - How hard they play! This year Cal has his guys playing at very high energy level on both ends and thats very effective when you are playing tough man to man defense and driving it hard to the goal every time.Cals style of play matches up great with Pitinos. And Selfs for that matter. He struggled against more modern perimeter oriented offenses. No clue what style Texas Tech plays.
Exactly. Remember when he returned with National Champions and added Stack, Sheed, and McInnis?If all that mattered was talent when winning championships then Dean Smith wouldn’t have lost 9 out of 11 times he went to the Final Four.
I don't think they can match up with our speed and length very well about like ST J.With Cal you never know- would not surprise me for Arkansas to beat TT nor would it surprise me for TT to beat them by 20
Don't take this the wrong way, and I may be wrong, but some injuries made you guys better. I am wondering if you are better off without him?I don't think they can match up with our speed and length very well about like ST J.
Anybody can win, but just like I always say scared on nobody line em up.
UPDATE
Per Cal, on the McAfee show, Adou is available for the Texas Tech game.
It was after The Boggie Man went down we got better the last game he played was the last game of the 0/5 SEC start then went 8/5 the rest of the way.Don't take this the wrong way, and I may be wrong, but some injuries made you guys better. I am wondering if you are better off without him?
That’s not true. Why make up stuff?Jeff Teague is the reason Marquis didn’t come back when he was told he needed to and would greatly improve his draft stock and his ability to stick in the league with another year.
I definitely remember tweets coming out saying that Jeff wanted Marquis to return for his sophomore seasonThat’s not true. Why make up stuff?
Going to be Thiero tomorrow night. The rotation of Aidoo, Brazile, Knox, and Richmond has been working well for the frontcourt. Thiero has been out and Cal will play him to a fault.Cal and Smith won all their championships in the Superdome. Cal won his normal-by winning. Smith's 2 championships were decided by a man throwing the ball to other team (Fred Brown to Worthy) and Chris Webber taking a timeout they didn't have. Think of all the talent/loaded teams and favorable paths to the Final Four and Dean Smith's 2 championships were decided on 2 of the most notable plays in NCAA History.
The one thing about young talent--and a team with a huge talent gap--keep it simple. When you have a team like '10/'12 Kentucky--you keep things very simple. No reason to make it complex-just go out and destroy people. That's smart.
Now where Cal didn't adjust is when he wasn't getting the top tier guys and had a nice group of talent--they were often outschemed and too easy to attack on both ends of the court.
If anything with Cal, I'd say he's cost himself by being too loyal to players and he's far from the only coach who does that. Trusting guys who shouldn't be trusted--playing people who have 0 business on the court. The '19 team should never have kept Reid Travis in so long against Auburn---he was worthless defensively and of the matchups that year between the teams-the close games were with Travis on the court and UK Ran them off the court when he put rim protection/length at the time with Richards/Montgomery.
I'm now hearing 8M in just NIL money. Then the profit sharing what ever that works out to.We shall see once this recruiting season shakes out. If Cal can still get the big names he will ride the mediocrity rail at Arkansas until he retires. If he can't get the names he will struggle mightily and probably get fired.
Someone has to point out that you clearly complimented yourself. That someone is me.I said basically this same thing in another thread. Great post.
For those that didn't read what Teague said, basically he said Cal won because they had hella talent, even in 2012. He told marques they would win because they were talented but the x/o was a$$.
The requirement that you read this thread exists only in your mind.I'm waiting for someone to say something we don't all know already....