JFK document dump today...

BlueVelvetFog

Active member
Apr 12, 2016
13,417
17,838
78
Take your pick . . . either way, you sought to apply a label, yet affirmed your own slavery and brand. Bow to the master, boy.
Ok let me ask. What good change will come about as a result of espousing these beliefs? At best you may be partially correct. At worst, you’re already making others paranoid and mistrustful of anyone in a higher power
 

bigbluefattycat

New member
Oct 5, 2005
14,557
4,530
0
In 1967, the CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" ... to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the "Official" Narrative

Summarizing the tactics which the CIA dispatch recommended:
  • Claim that it would be impossible for so many people would keep quiet about such a big conspiracy
  • Claim that eyewitness testimony is unreliable
  • Claim that this is all old news, as “no significant new evidence has emerged”
  • Ignore conspiracy claims unless discussion about them is already too active
  • Claim that it’s irresponsible to speculate
  • Accuse theorists of being wedded to and infatuated with their theories
  • Accuse theorists of being politically motivated
  • Accuse theorists of having financial interests in promoting conspiracy theories
In other words, the CIA’s clandestine services unit created the arguments for attacking conspiracy theories as unreliable in the 1960s as part of its psychological warfare operations.

But Our Leaders Wouldn’t Do That
While people might admit that corporate executives and low-level government officials might have engaged in conspiracies – they may be strongly opposed to considering that the wealthiest or most powerful might possibly have done so.

But powerful insiders have long admitted to conspiracies. For example, Obama’s Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass Sunstein, wrote:

Of course some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true. The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the Central Intelligence Agency did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of “mind control.” Operation Northwoods, a rumored plan by the Department of Defense to simulate acts of terrorism and to blame them on Cuba, really was proposed by high-level officials ….

But Someone Would Have Spilled the Beans
A common defense to people trying sidetrack investigations into potential conspiracies is to say that “someone would have spilled the beans” if there were really a conspiracy.

But famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg explains:

It is a commonplace that “you can’t keep secrets in Washington” or “in a democracy, no matter how sensitive the secret, you’re likely to read it the next day in the New York Times.” These truisms are flatly false. They are in fact cover stories, ways of flattering and misleading journalists and their readers, part of the process of keeping secrets well. Of course eventually many secrets do get out that wouldn’t in a fully totalitarian society. But the fact is that the overwhelming majority of secrets do not leak to the American public. This is true even when the information withheld is well known to an enemy and when it is clearly essential to the functioning of the congressional war power and to any democratic control of foreign policy. The reality unknown to the public and to most members of Congress and the press is that secrets that would be of the greatest import to many of them can be kept from them reliably for decades by the executive branch, even though they are known to thousands of insiders.

 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueElvis

downw/ball-lineD

New member
Jan 2, 2003
7,879
3,573
0
You're hardly persuasive.


Mav, u are an admirable and funny poster. I often enjoy your posts. That said, Gerald posner stinks. Guy is on the front line of the official story every time. Has he ever truly investigated anything beyond the official version? He came close to admitting James earl Ray didn't act alone but it nearly killed him to do it. Just don't have much reverence for the guy. In case closed he basically concluded because lee Oswald shot at some conservative general he must have shot Kennedy. Just not enough for me. I'll just agree to disagree
 
  • Like
Reactions: -Mav-

-Mav-

New member
Jun 19, 2017
4,693
12,354
0
Mav, u are an admirable and funny poster. I often enjoy your posts. That said, Gerald posner stinks. Guy is on the front line of the official story every time. Has he ever truly investigated anything beyond the official version? He came close to admitting James earl Ray didn't act alone but it nearly killed him to do it. Just don't have much reverence for the guy. In case closed he basically concluded because lee Oswald shot at some conservative general he must have shot Kennedy. Just not enough for me. I'll just agree to disagree
I was just aggravating man.
 

BlueVelvetFog

Active member
Apr 12, 2016
13,417
17,838
78
[laughing] Dude IDGAFF who killed Kennedy, and I especially DGAFF who y’all think killed Kennedy.
IT WASs THAT JON WILKS BOOTH SONBITCH WhO ALSO SHOT AARON BURR WHO tHEN HAD tO PLAY IRONSIDEs in THAT WHEElCHAR AFTER HE WAS PARRY MASON!!

DAMm YOU fOR IGNORE HISTORY aND gO CAYTS.!!!?!!