Johnny Dawkins out at Stanford

Laettner15

New member
Jan 25, 2016
1,948
2,113
0
Just got the update that Johnny Dawkins was let go at Stanford. Sucks, I really like Johnny Dawkins and really hope he finds a new gig soon!
 

dukiejay

New member
Mar 2, 2005
268,490
16,311
0
Sucks for JD. He had a rough go of it there for eight years. They had a couple decent teams but none of real significance.
 
Jun 4, 2015
4,162
5,515
0
Really thought JD would be able to make Stanford an annual tournament team, much like they were in the 90's.
I have read that Stanford is really cracking down on academic standards for their athletes, and that it crippled the basketball program. Much like Notre Dame the past 10 years in football.
 

Willcampbell

New member
Oct 20, 2004
2,480
2,137
0
Really thought JD would be able to make Stanford an annual tournament team, much like they were in the 90's.
I have read that Stanford is really cracking down on academic standards for their athletes, and that it crippled the basketball program. Much like Notre Dame the past 10 years in football.
Totally disagree.
OFC
 

dukiejay

New member
Mar 2, 2005
268,490
16,311
0
Well, recruiting at a 'Blue Blood' school is much easier, let alone when you have Coach K on your right hip. I'm sure opportunities will arise for JD in the not so distant future.
 

Willcampbell

New member
Oct 20, 2004
2,480
2,137
0
My final comment about JD, and it is not Monday morning quarterbacking. I thought at the time that Stanford was too big a leap for an assistant, or associate or whatever, even from Duke. Of course that wasn't JD's fault...Stanford's the one that offered. Would have loved for him to get his chops at a Temple, St. Joe's, or Big East team. I think now he'll have to take a step back to that kind of level. And I do wish him well....this was not designed to be a knock on JD. I loved the guy at Duke and in the NBA.
OFC
 

aah555

New member
Apr 13, 2010
3,064
242
0
Well, recruiting at a 'Blue Blood' school is much easier, let alone when you have Coach K on your right hip. I'm sure opportunities will arise for JD in the not so distant future.

I've watched a lot of Stanford basketball since JD took over the job (though not much this year). IMO, JD struggled as a coach and motivator, not as a recruiter. While he certainly didn't recruit at the level he did at Duke, before this year, Stanford's squads regularly had enough talent to consistently compete for NCAA tourneys and make some noise in the Pac 12 championship race (particularly before Arizona really picked it up the past 3-4 years). But JD's teams consistently blew games they shouldn't, struggled with TOs and shot selection, didn't execute well in late game situations, and just didn't consistently play with the type of energy and focus you need to be very good.

If you look at Rivals ratings, between 10-15, JD recruited one 5* kid, and 8 4* kids -- most, if not all, who stayed 4 years in an era where most coaches would dream for that kind of stability. From a pure talent perspective (at least as judged by recruiting rankings), JD's generally had a lot of pretty talented and very experienced squads that should have been able to win in a generally down cycle in the Pac 12.

JD's a nice guy and probably a very solid assistant. But, as the head man, I wouldn't hire him at a high-major program -- including A-10 or Big East jobs. I think he's a mediocre head coach.
 
Last edited:

crazyduke3

New member
Mar 28, 2010
40,929
2,564
0
I've watched a lot of Stanford basketball since JD took over the job (though not much this year). IMO, JD struggled as a coach and motivator, not as a recruiter. While he certainly didn't recruit at the level he did at Duke, before this year, Stanford's squads regularly had enough talent to consistently compete for NCAA tourneys and make some noise in the Pac 12 championship race (particularly before Arizona really picked it up the past 3-4 years). But JD's teams consistently blew games they shouldn't, struggled with TOs and shot selection, didn't execute well in late game situations, and just didn't consistently play with the type of energy and focus you need to be very good.

If you look at Rivals ratings, between 10-15, JD recruited one 5* kid, and 8 4* kids -- most, if not all, who stayed 4 years in an era where most coaches would dream for that kind of stability. From a pure talent perspective (at least as judged by recruiting rankings), JD's generally had a lot of pretty talented and very experienced squads that should have been able to win in a generally down cycle in the Pac 12.

JD's a nice guy and probably a very solid assistant. But, as the head man, I wouldn't hire him at a high-major program -- including A-10 or Big East jobs. I just don't think he's anything other than a mediocre head coach.

I feel the same. I love JD, he's amazing but he struggled. I hope he finds succsess in his next work.