Kentucky now a 4 seed in bracketology

ImTheVillageIdiot

All-American
May 18, 2024
3,396
9,017
0
I told everyone that was what was going to happen and why you should have rooted for Auburn to beat A&M but some didn't listen to me and rooted for A&M to win anyway.
Haha the nail at the foul line was the nail in our coffin. I kid. Win at Mizzou and we still get the big boy spot
 

ImTheVillageIdiot

All-American
May 18, 2024
3,396
9,017
0
He had us at a 3 we beat LSU by 31, like Dook beating up on the very few bums we play, also beat SC by 20 and he drops us. It's all bs.
He didn’t drop us so much as Texas A&M passed us. That’s the only team we were ahead of that’s now ahead of us. We beat LSU but they beat Auburn
 

HenryMuto

Heisman
Mar 31, 2012
18,872
12,259
113
Here is a 6 man live committee doing the entire committee work just the same way the real committee does it. They worked on it over 5 hours yesterday (I watched all 5 hrs)

They are currently in progress. They currently have Kentucky as a 3 seed #9 overall.

 
Last edited:

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
I told everyone before we played Auburn that kept saying a loss doesn't hurt us that might be true but also wins over LSU don't help us either. Also I told everyone even if we stay where we are at with an Auburn loss that other teams could win and still pass us by and that is what happened with Texas Tech winning at Kansas and A&M beating Auburn.
A&M was a 2 seed when the reveal was done, so it’s not as big of a deal, really. Same as them staying the same.

Looking at the top 16 on the 15th:

1 Auburn still 1.
2 Bama probably dropped a seed line.
3 Duke moved up a spot most likely.
4 Florida probably stayed about the same.
5 UT has maybe slid a little.
6 A&M probably down a little.
7 Purdue probably slipped some.
8 Houston probably moved up.
9 Iowa St. probably dropped some.
10 Kentucky probably stayed the same.
11 Wisconsin probably dropped a little.
12 Zona probably dropped a little.
13 Texas Tech probably climbed up some.
14 Michigan probably fell some.
15 Kansas likely dropped out of top 16.
16 St. John’s has moved up a bit.

Michigan St. wasn’t even in the reveal, but have been on an absolute tear, adding some big Quad 1 wins. They have definitely moved up to the top 16 and probably passed us.

But my point is, there hasn’t been that much movement, in the grand scheme of things, and just as many have likely moved down as moved up.

And who has played as tough of a schedule since the 15th as we have? 4 Q1 games, 1 Q2 and a Q3.

We should not have moved much either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk* and Aike

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
Here is a 6 man live committee doing the entire committee work just the same way the real committee does it. They worked on it over 5 hours yesterday (I watched all 5 hrs)

They are currently in progress. They currently have Kentucky as a 3 seed #9 overall.


This is good stuff. Thanks for posting, bro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HenryMuto

Aike

Heisman
Mar 17, 2002
75,314
45,922
90
Not if we don’t beat Missouri or win two games in SECT. Honestly, our metrics aren’t three seed right now and we have experienced some leniency from the committee. We can still earn that three though.
Considering the quality of our wins, I think we are a three now. We have also played fine without JR.

Two straight losses from this point could drop us, especially if we play poorly. But our metrics actually weren’t that bad vs. Auburn, and we were lights out against LSU.
 

ImTheVillageIdiot

All-American
May 18, 2024
3,396
9,017
0
Considering the quality of our wins, I think we are a three now. We have also played fine without JR.

Two straight losses from this point could drop us, especially if we play poorly. But our metrics actually weren’t that bad vs. Auburn, and we were lights out against LSU.
Trust me, I’d be very happy if we got 3. I don’t want to play Duke. I do worry TXAM, St. John’s and Michigan State have jumped us since the tournament reveal show. We shall see.
 

Aike

Heisman
Mar 17, 2002
75,314
45,922
90
Trust me, I’d be very happy if we got 3. I don’t want to play Duke. I do worry TXAM, St. John’s and Michigan State have jumped us since the tournament reveal show. We shall see.
Can’t imagine A&M jumping us when they started out ahead of us.

Edit: you probably meant Tech.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImTheVillageIdiot
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
I just want to remind everyone that while Lunardi gets all the fame for being on ESPN and whatnot he’s not generally all that good at this when compared to other bracket guys.

I’d suggest to just look at bracket matrix. It’s probably a better snapshot on where we are at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImTheVillageIdiot

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
How many potential 3 seeds have a winning record against the current projected 1 seeds? UK is 2-1 (beat Duke and UF, lost to Auburn).

How many potential 3 seeds have a winning record against the 1 and 2 seeds at the reveal? UK is 5-3 against those teams (beat Duke, UF, A&M, and UT twice, lost to Auburn and Bama twice).

It’s gong to be up to the SC. I guess they can use Robinson’s injury to penalize us, if they want.

But our resume is superb.
 

HenryMuto

Heisman
Mar 31, 2012
18,872
12,259
113
I was arguing with some guy on the field of 68 bracket show he said Kentucky should be an 8 or 9 seed lol
 
Jan 30, 2018
16,155
24,635
0
He didn’t drop us so much as Texas A&M passed us. That’s the only team we were ahead of that’s now ahead of us. We beat LSU but they beat Auburn
We beat them and before that win they had lost 4 straight. #1 or not going 1 and 4 in your last 5 shouldn't even have them close enough to us to jump us.
 

Catzman

Heisman
Apr 29, 2002
16,863
13,180
113
Beat Mizzou and do damage in the SECt and we should be a 3. Lose to Mizzou, compounded with no Robinson, and I can understand us not being a 3.
 

sjjones

Sophomore
Nov 3, 2005
433
159
43
They are going to have to bump up and bump down a few SEC teams along the way to keep them from playing each other too early.
 
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
The committee has a history of taking injuries into account (& they probably should). We only have 1 good win without JR (UT). Missouri would make 2. But I think we need a third (in SEC-T) to have a chance at retaining a 3 seed.
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Regardless what happens, we'll probably be a 3 seed or 4 seed.

Think too much weight is given towards the end of year stuff.........recency bias I guess. But when push comes to shove our resume stacks up better than the teams around us which will give us a bump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aike
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
They are going to have to bump up and bump down a few SEC teams along the way to keep them from playing each other too early.

Or just relax the rule. I think that seems a bit more likely.
Given the number of teams increasing quite a bit in some of the power conferences, this is going to become unavoidable in the future anyways.
 

Runt#1969

All-American
Dec 13, 2010
20,649
7,778
113
I would not like my Gators to run into the Cats in the tournament. You guys can beat anyone at full strength and focus. I don’t know why, but I’m pulling for you guys to do well. I kind of like UK’s pouty fanbase. lol
I wouldn't like to see Florida again - period! I think Florida is the best team in the SEC. I know, some may think me crazy. Really impressed with Golden's coaching job this year. Auburn has too many punks and immature antics to make a Final Four (we shall see)

But that was the game of the year earlier this year against your Gators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deputy assistant

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
They are going to have to bump up and bump down a few SEC teams along the way to keep them from playing each other too early.
Or just relax the rule. I think that seems a bit more likely.
Given the number of teams increasing quite a bit in some of the power conferences, this is going to become unavoidable in the future anyways.
The rule states that if a conference has 9 or more teams in the field, the matchup rules can be relaxed, meaning they can put teams playing each other much earlier than they could for conferences with 8 or fewer bids.

This is why the “bracket gurus” have some possible second round matchups between SEC teams. One I saw a few weeks back was UK as a 3 seed and Arkansas as an 11, meaning they could play in the second game, if Arkansas upset the 6 seed.

I don’t think they would put two SEC teams playing in the opening round, but anything after that could be fair game with the conference likely having 12 or 13 bids.

The Big Ten may be in the same situation with more than 9 teams projected into the field.
 

Blueworld_3.0

Heisman
Sep 23, 2008
14,061
11,152
113
We've held on to a #3 seed for longer than we probably should have considering injuries and losses. I think a #4 seed is probably about right for this team.
Now, I do think we need to win one game in the SEC-T to secure on of the better #4 seeds.
 

HenryMuto

Heisman
Mar 31, 2012
18,872
12,259
113
Just needed wins at Texas and at Vanderbilt we were up 5 with 3:55 left at Texas and up 1 with 2 mins left and folded.

Those 2 wins would put us in contention for a 2 seed and 3 seed would been locked.

Also 3 losses at home is 1 too many really hate losing 2 games let alone 3 in a season at home.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
Just needed wins at Texas and at Vanderbilt we were up 5 with 3:55 left at Texas and up 1 with 2 mins left and folded.

Those 2 wins would put us in contention for a 2 seed and 3 seed would been locked.

Also 3 losses at home is 1 too many really hate losing 2 games let alone 3 in a season at home.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda.

Can’t dwell on the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JwUKFan11