Geez, we have a lot of people here who are just convinced that Kerr can't improve into being a starter after a full year in Pope's system, working on his shooting, getting comfortable at UK, and maturing another year. Good to know. Some are still just too blinded by Cal's 5-star freshmen recruit point guards like Wall, Fox, Knight, SGA, et al.
Many were VERY disappointed he went after Butler to be the starter, too. Don't forget that.
Is Kerr a better shooter than he showed in his 9 games and 156 minutes at UK? I have no doubt that he is a better shooter than that.
UK:
26.3% (10-38) 3pt, 40% (2-5) 2pt
Zona & WV:
36.8% (238-647) 3pt, 40.2% (68-169) 2pt
Looking at this drop in 3pt shooting statistically, ignoring his Zona & WV %'s, the 95% confidence interval around his 26.3% is +/-14%, meaning we are 95% certain that given an infinite # of shots he would make between 12.3% & 40.3% of them. The 90% CI is +/-11.7%, putting him between 14.6% & 38%. So within the 36.8% he made at Zona & WV. He simply started the season in a slump. Recall Grady finishing the season in a similar slump, but he played the first 2/3 of the year making 50%, in the end finishing slightly better than his Davidson days. So, statistically had he not gotten injured, there is every reason to believe Kerr would have turned it around.
If you look at his WV & Zona days, with 647 3's, you can get a much more precise estimate of that 90% confidence interval, it is +/-3.1%, meaning we are 90% confident (going into the season) that Kerr is a 33.7-39.9% 3pt shooter (given enough attempts). But in just 9 games, he didn't build up a large enough sample size. Now that we can include his 9 games at UK, that 90% CI is 33.2-39.2%.