Wasn’t Zack Smith the one accused of domestic abuse/alcoholism on Meyer’s staff?I did, but I also listen to Zack Smith, Chris, Scoop and many others.
Wasn’t Zack Smith the one accused of domestic abuse/alcoholism on Meyer’s staff?I did, but I also listen to Zack Smith, Chris, Scoop and many others.
I agree. But that is a MASSIVE if. You have no data points to predict success, except recruiting prowess and WR development. This will be a learning on the fly hire. Not how I choose personnel.If he is successful here, yes. Then the options may be even wider next time to piggyback on his success. NOBODY is staying long term anywhere anymore. People need to get over it. Franklin’s tenure here was longer than most these days.
Yes. And? Does this lessen his knowledge of football?Wasn’t Zack Smith the one accused of domestic abuse/alcoholism on Meyer’s staff?
I think within the last couple of weeks, I did a post that showed nine out of the top 15 ranked programs had a head coach who was not a head coach at his previous job. A few were even position coaches.I agree. But that is a MASSIVE if. You have no data points to predict success, except recruiting prowess and WR development. This will be a learning on the fly hire. Not how I choose personnel.
I read it and it was accurate. The issue is that not all are the same; specific candidates differ. All HCs at some point were coordinators or position coaches before. Hell, Urban was a WR coach before becoming a HC. The issue is Hartline. What on his resume provides you with the confidence that he is ready for this job?I think within the last couple of weeks, I did a post that showed nine out of the top 15 ranked programs had a head coach who was not a head coach at his previous job. A few were even position coaches.
Outside of Saban, Meyer, DeBoer, etc, they are all massive risks. Nothing guaranteed hereI agree. But that is a MASSIVE if. You have no data points to predict success, except recruiting prowess and WR development. This will be a learning on the fly hire. Not how I choose personnel.
It’s Schrodinger’s coach. Hartline will simultaneously suck AND be stolen back by OSU.So we question whether Hartline is good enough for us , but if Day leaves he’s the anointed OSU HC ?
Seems we have a few OSU homers here trying to downplay Hartline - doesn't matter what is posted here none of us are making the hiring decision. Hartline would be a decent hire and would probable bring some recruits here at least on the offensive side - Knowles and Hartline - PSU = OSU West.
Look man. You want to give the reins of a major college program to a guy who has zero experience outside of he OSU ecosystem and has been coaching less than a decade knock yourself out. Fact is he was demoted three years ago because he could not call a game without sucking, learned one year under Kelly, and now is on training wheels under Day's supervision. I get being enamored by a shiny new object, but you have zero data points that he could be successful or fail. I am no concerned that he would leave, because it will be just as likely that he will be fired way before that and suffer damage to his reputation.Outside of Saban, Meyer, DeBoer, etc, they are all massive risks. Nothing guaranteed here
What they said about Kirby, Debo, Lanning, etc etc.... Great we get Campbell and win 8-9 games a year. Another lateral move for PSU.I agree. But that is a MASSIVE if. You have no data points to predict success, except recruiting prowess and WR development. This will be a learning on the fly hire. Not how I choose personnel.
We aren’t looking at him for OC. He can hire someone for that. He’s been around wildly successful football his entire life and is regarded as one of, if not the, best assistant coaches/recruiters in college football. But if you think they are going to pull a rabbit out of a hat and get someone who has name recognition and proven success higher than Franklin, reading the tea leaves, it isn’t looking good.Look man. You want to give the reins of a major college program to a guy who has zero experience outside of he OSU ecosystem and has been coaching less than a decade knock yourself out. Fact is he was demoted three years ago because he could not call a game without sucking, learned one year under Kelly, and now is on training wheels under Day's supervision. I get being enamored by a shiny new object, but you have zero data points that he could be successful or fail. I am no concerned that he would leave, because it will be just as likely that he will be fired way before that and suffer damage to his reputation.
Exactly... he may have input in the scheme and game plan and maybe suggest a few plays but he will be hiring a OC to do the play calling.We aren’t looking at him for OC. He can hire someone for that. He’s been around wildly successful football his entire life and is regarded as one of, if not the, best assistant coaches/recruiters in college football. But if you think they are going to pull a rabbit out of a hat and get someone who has name recognition and proven success higher than Franklin, reading the tea leaves, it isn’t looking good.
I think if "sure thing" walks through the door for the job, we'd all agree we should take that person. DeBoer, Saban, etc. That's not a disagreement, at least from me.Look man. You want to give the reins of a major college program to a guy who has zero experience outside of he OSU ecosystem and has been coaching less than a decade knock yourself out. Fact is he was demoted three years ago because he could not call a game without sucking, learned one year under Kelly, and now is on training wheels under Day's supervision. I get being enamored by a shiny new object, but you have zero data points that he could be successful or fail. I am no concerned that he would leave, because it will be just as likely that he will be fired way before that and suffer damage to his reputation.
anyone waiting for the elusive "home run hire" is going to be disappointedI think if "sure thing" walks through the door for the job, we'd all agree we should take that person. DeBoer, Saban, etc. That's not a disagreement, at least from me.
Absent of that, it's just trading off risks. Hartline brings a risk of not being outside the Ohio State ecosystem. Fickell had only been in the Ohio State ecosystem, got the Cincy job, KILLED IT there, then fell on his face at Wisconsin. Scott Frost had been at many places, won everywhere, commanded a Heisman Trophy winner as an OC, had back to back unbeaten seasons at UCF, fell on his face at his alma mater. The Cignetti hire was universally laughed at, his press conference mocked ("Google me").
This isn't a perfect science, it's all a gamble fitting coach strengths/weaknesses, school strengths and weaknesses, etc. You can't know ahead of time absent, as you said, a lot of data. Even having data doesn't help sometimes. There's a ton on Saban, he'd win, we all know it. But he's not walking in the door. Rhule would be about 7-5 every year, we know it. In between them, not much data, so do the best you can and make a reasonable hire. Hartline, thanks to his recruiting reputation and position at a school that has done nothing but win ever since he got there 20 years ago as a player (I know he was in the NFL a while too), is as reasonable as anyone.
anyone waiting for the elusive "home run hire" is going to be disappointed
JMO but if and big if Day leaves I think it would be a 2 man race between Freeman and Hartline.So we question whether Hartline is good enough for us , but if Day leaves he’s the anointed OSU HC ?
Rank your to 5 list of coaches for PSU....Of course not. Everyone will leave at some point. The real point is do you want to be the training ground for someone who is not really prepared for your job so that you "may" capitalize later (if there is later).
Makes me very thankful.....An interesting side note is that after tomorrow, Penn State will not play Ohio State again until 2028.
Yes. Did you understand what you posted? Geez.Huh? Did you read the entire conversation?
Gee and here I thought Hartline only became OC this year. Wow.Hartline was an absolute disaster the first time he was given play calling responsibities, so much so that Day took play calling duties away from him. The following year he brought in Chip Kelly (that should tell you his level of confidence with Hartline's ability to run the offense). This year Day called the Texas game and Hartline has called the remainder (not sure how much involvement Day has). Is he a offensive genius under the thumb of a control freak (Day)? Maybe. Maybe he is just a great, exception WR coach and recruiter. Maybe that is his ceiling despite his aspirations to a HC job. We will know this only after he leaves OSU. Does PSU want to be the guinea pig?
Hartline is not bringing recruits from OSU, unless they cant play at OSU. He is an excellent recruiter but OSU is bigger than any coach. Its very different from Penn State where recruits were "Franklin's" guys. OSU recruits are not Day''s guys they are OSU's guys (one reason not a single defensive player went with Knowles. Neither did Matt G. (his protege).
Hiring Hartline is extremely risky. He may be charismatic and very capable but has zero experience being the CEO of a massive organization.
He would be incredibly stupid to risk failing at the juncture of his career, at a very high profile spot. He would be better off at a smaller school, expand his skill set, then look for a bigger challenge. I do not doubt that his ego and competitiveness and perhaps impatience may get the better of him but if I were in his circle I would tell him to stay put. He has NFL money so it is not a money issue for him at this juncture.
Yeah sure far better to hire those “experienced” retreads.I read it and it was accurate. The issue is that not all are the same; specific candidates differ. All HCs at some point were coordinators or position coaches before. Hell, Urban was a WR coach before becoming a HC. The issue is Hartline. What on his resume provides you with the confidence that he is ready for this job?
When I interviewed for jobs in years past and then interviewed people for jobs, experience was the number one variable that needed to check out. I do not see it here; too many holes in the resume (and the current position is not disqualifying).
Feel free to elaborate how your hero Franklin leads us to the playoffs after dropping to 3-3 midseason.Yeah sure far better to hire those “experienced” retreads.
Don't want Bowen back.While not questioning how good Bowen is at recruiting, OSU fans aren’t exactly thrilled with their OL coaching this year. They haven’t been able to run the ball.
If we pull the trigger on Hartline I doubt he brings much with him from OSU - there’s too much loyalty there. Unless a WR or two only want to be developed by him.
Hartline would probably be asked to ditch OSU and commit to recruiting, portal, and staff. He could potentially keep more of our current staff then we realize.
Worth an interview.First time poster. 45 year Penn state fan. I agree Hartline would leave for OSU if the job comes open. I agree with the other person that was mentioned in that interview. Fran Brown he was 10-3 last year at Syracuse with Kyle McCord as his quarterback. This year he was good until his starting qb went down with an injury. He was the number 1 recruiter in the country while at Georgia. Now he has head coaching experience at Syracuse. Imagine what he could do at Penn State.
And I think Freeman would win.JMO but if and big if Day leaves I think it would be a 2 man race between Freeman and Hartline.
Realistic choices (in no particular order):Rank your to 5 list of coaches for PSU....
Couldn't care less if that happens because then he was damn successfulSo we question whether Hartline is good enough for us , but if Day leaves he’s the anointed OSU HC ?
Not that it matters these days but didn't realize Hartline was tatted up with sleeves
I agree that is a realistic list. I'm thinking Brown is 5th (at best) of those 5.Realistic choices (in no particular order):
- Drinkwitz (Mizzou)
- Brohm (Louisville)
- Chesney (JMU)
- Lea (Vandy)
- Fran Brown (Cuse)
For me Brohm is the only one that moves the needle on that list. Realistic I guess but Brohm would be the only 1 who gets me excited about the next coach. If not Brohm I would rather take a flyer on Key or Golesh.I agree that is a realistic list. I'm thinking Brown is 5th (at best) of those 5.
Prolly the majority of the recruits are inked up too.Not that it matters these days but didn't realize Hartline was tatted up with sleeves