So much for the party of tolerance. [thumbsup]
I don't agree that they are reacting to hate and violence. It's been quite a while since anything came from the Trump side. So, either he set the hook pretty deep when he went trolling or we are seeing what the Left has truly become.It is pretty amazing isn't it.
People lashing out because of hate and violence with hate and violence.
Very appropriate rational. Is that the same accepted logic for validation of anarchy, or what prompts ISIS and other terrorists against US? Weak. But I guess there is an explanation offered for any action taken against our country.It is pretty amazing isn't it.
People lashing out because of hate and violence with hate and violence.
I agree this is the reason it is happening. I am very much against this type of protestingIt is pretty amazing isn't it.
People lashing out because of hate and violence with hate and violence.
So, either he set the hook pretty deep when he went trolling or we are seeing what the Left has truly become.
They don't even know what and why they are protesting. They were just doing what they were told to do.This is what the far left has been for a very long time.
Give me an of example of Trump supporters at this event unleashing hate and violence.It is pretty amazing isn't it.
People lashing out because of hate and violence with hate and violence.
Give me an of example of Trump supporters at this event unleashing hate and violence.
You did say "lashing out because of hate and violence". Show me any instance that Trump used violence. Maybe these so called Soros financed "protestors" should riot at the next Democrat event in light of these comments by Barbara Boxer; "I feared for my safety and I had a lot of security around me". "I've never had anything like this happen." Boxer said she felt threatened after outbursts and threats at the Nevada Democratic Convention from supporters of Bernie SandersI didn't say "at this event" ... I didn't even make any comment validating their outrage, just pointing out the lunacy in reacting to something that infuriates them in the same manner that invoked the fury in the first place.
You did say "lashing out because of hate and violence". Show me any instance that Trump used violence. Maybe these so called Soros financed "protestors" should riot at the next Democrat event in light of these comments by Barbara Boxer; "I feared for my safety and I had a lot of security around me". "I've never had anything like this happen." Boxer said she felt threatened after outbursts and threats at the Nevada Democratic Convention from supporters of Bernie Sanders
But for crying out loud, how about "perceived hate and violence"?
Good God.....you must have lived a very sheltered life. I every part of the clip the actually showed Trump.....I would have said the same to the nutjobs.
But for crying out loud, how about "perceived hate and violence"?
I'm not sure what you don't understand ... my entire statement and opinion on this is that protesters are idiots.
You asked for proof that Trump used violence, and I provided it. I'm sorry you don't like it being pointed out or that you want to validate it or justify it because he's your party's candidate. I didn't live a sheltered life, and I also don't bury my head in the sand but it's also not at all common to see this kind of talk from a potential POTUS. If you don't think his rubes are influenced or emboldened by his rhetoric, then I would have to say it's you that's lived a very sheltered life.
Regardless of mine or your opinions about that, my stance remains that the protesters are idiots.
You're entering Neil territory in assuming or reading things into it just to argue about something.
I never saw Trump promote any violence. Telling security to throw an uninvited agitator out is promoting violence?
Now that he's got the GOP nomination sewn up, he's backing off a lot of positions that got him there.
It should make you happy that he is trying to be more "Presidential". Do you really think he is going to build a wall..... I don't. You might be making a mistake by bring up the point about candidates "backing off positions".....that can become a very slippery slop.
Lets end this useless banter.......I have tried to bring you around. You win....I give up.You mean unauthentic? So then what makes him any different than any of the others? Besides a lack of experience, qualifications and knowledge? And he lies and lies and lies about things he's said in the past. He claims he never said things that people have video of him saying, and even when confronted with the video he talks around it. He lies about who he knows or who he's heard of.
I actually wonder if he has any concept of honesty, or if because of his narcissistic personality that he actually believes that the truth is whatever he wants it to be in that instant.
An unauthentic, lying politician. He sure is breaking the mold.
He said he was going to build a wall. Are you saying that we shouldn't believe anything he says? If so, I agree. But I'll ask again exactly what, then, would make him any different? And exactly what, then, are people voting for if he's not going to actually do any of the things he said he would?
At first he said that everybody's taxes would be lower, then he said that they will probably go up after getting the nomination. The ban on Muslims was "just a suggestion". At this point everything was "just a suggestion" so it doesn't seem like he has any real policy on anything.
Also.....maybe you can show me the quote from Trump that states "all Mexicans are murders and rapists".........you know the one that is headlined all over the media.
Lets end this useless banter.......I have tried to bring you around. You win....I give up.
Born, you are pissing in the wind. This individual lies, lies and lies about things he's said in the past. When he is confronted with absolute diction from him, he talks around it and rallies a couple of his blind followers to go along. He is a pathetic POS and absolutely void of integrity. The son-of-a-***** was even low enough to make a crass remark about my just deceased wife. Of course he denied and said it was me who misunderstood. he is unconscious government trough feeder. Yes, he has led or simply been sheltered in life. He suggests he has lived in a world of utopia. Instead, he has lived in his small world of make believe. Or alternatively just the stupidest bastard to come by.Besides a lack of experience, qualifications and knowledge? And he lies and lies and lies about things he's said in the past. He claims he never said things that people have video of him saying, and even when confronted with the video he talks around it
But for crying out loud, how about "perceived hate and violence"?