Good for them, but who really cares? I know folks here like to pump up WVU's rifle team, but any sport that doesn't make money or have a high profile professional league like baseball are a crap shoot. Hard to get excited to be the pinnacle of a sport that so many other possible competitors don't even bother trying to compete in. It's why I don't put a lot of stock in the US for the World Cup when a vast majority of the countries in that competition have soccer as their pinnacle of sport. I.E. the best athletes in those countries want to be the best at soccer. While the US soccer team really is just the scraps left over after football, basketball, baseball, and to a lesser extent hockey have picked through the populace. It's why the best soccer team in the US is not much, but the best MLB or NBA team in the US is the best in the world. Hence an NCAA football, basketball and to a far lesser extent baseball championship means more since it is against a large number of schools that actual try to win. While just about every other college sport has only a fraction of the schools actually trying to win rather than just going through the motions.
No matter the talent foundation or the circumstance, this accomplishment was all good for this tiny little state called West Virginia.
Personally, I salute the Big Green. And, taking down those high and mighty Hoosiers in anything is even more tasty. A little bit of "Hoosiers" in reverse, in my opinion. A tearing down of the "picket fence" was on display last night. As the sun came up this morning, the splash across the national news scene featured Marshall taking down Goliath. It was the sling shot heard 'round the states.
Just curious, what IF the West Virginia University Mountaineers had won that same title? Your comments would have been worded in what manner?
National champs associated with any West Virginia school is an accomplishment that I relish. A basketball title or a football championship are on my wish list for my beloved Mountaineers. I could then leave this earth with a smile on my face.
Today, I am smiling.
Kudos to them for doing what it takes to winHerd's team was made up mostly of Central and South Americans, and I believe one player from Canada, maybe two.
I may have heard wrong, but I thought I heard the announcers say that only one American player was on the team, or it could have been only one West Virginian was on the team. Either way, most were from south of the U.S. border.
WVU won a rifle NC.....must be a nice feeling.
WVU won a rifle NC.
Most real WVU fans know that though...
NCAA named the champions starting 1939. No other tournament ever named an NCAA champion. NIT might have had the bigger names and better teams but they never named the winner as the NCAA Div. 1 National Champion. NCAA began that in 1939 by doing so.
The only one pissing on anything is your attitude towards people because they do not agree with you. Dude take a freaking chill pill.DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACE THAT THE NIT WINNER BACK THEN WAS THE DE FACTO NATIONAL CHAMP. NO MATTER HOW YOU WANT TO SPIN IT. 1942 NIT CHAMP WAS WAY BIGGER THAN THE 1942 NCAA WINNER WHEN STANFORD BEAT DARTMOUTH. BOTH STANFORD AND WVU WERE CONSIDERED CO-CHAMPS BY EXPERTS OF THAT YEAR. CLOSE ENOUGH FOR ME. WHY DO YOU WANT TO PISS ON IT?
This is nothing more than your biased opinion, and posting it in capital letters, over and over and day after day, doesn't make your assertion factual. The field of each tournament strongly supports the argument that the NCAA Tournament was the more prestigious of the two tournaments, and only biased WVU "journalists" ignore this fact. Take a look at the programs in each tournament field:WVU WAS THE NATIONAL CHAMP IN 1942 WHEN IT WON THE NIT.
I always chuckle when CFE types in all caps.