I never like labeling a game a "must win". Too much pressure... I think Haith mentioned something similar to that line of thinking in his pregame presser. What we need is a 2-1 close. But I think a 1-2 close and trip to finals may yet be good enough. Fingers are crossed. We played like a Sweet 16 team tonight.Originally posted by Weatherdemon:
I think it is a must win with all of the reasoning being put forth for TU to not get in.
Agree on the SMU/MU game...
Yep.Originally posted by Gold*:
It will be a lot easier to win at Memphis than SMU.
BINGO!Originally posted by texcane1982:
Memphis is a very undisciplned team with an arrogrant head coach. IMO if Memphis beats SMU, they will likely strut into saturday's game with a false sense of confidence/arrogance.
The big advantage TU had over Memphis last time was composure.
TX
LOL, NS!Originally posted by Gold*:
But in the bspi, Tulsa is 956 and Memphis is lol and SMU is Larry Brown gits ratingz. Cinci and Temple used to be good so they get lots of love in bspi.
Very true.Originally posted by texcane1982:
The big advantage TU had over Memphis last time was composure.
I think you're confused. We know the exact RPI formula and the NCAA releases rankings periodically on their website.Originally posted by TU_BLA:
Now most of the RPI systems try to mirror what the NCAA is going to do so they have stat guys crunching numbers and developing formulas they think that RPI system uses but in reality they are just guessing.
It assumes we beat Cincy and lose to SMU. That is fair. I guess one could assume that if we beat both we will probably project a top 30 RPI.Originally posted by bigzit:
Latest RPI Forecast
March 1, 2015
Tulsa
Conference: Amer
Expected RPI: 33.2
Current RPI: 30
Expected SOS: 89
Current SOS: 100
Current Record: 21-6
Expected Record: 22-7
Current Conf Record: 14-2
Expected Conf Record: 15-3
Ctt: What do you think is the issue with the ESPN RPI ranking? Tulsa has been approx. 4 to 5 places low lately. Also do you know what SMU's final RPI rating last year when they got left out?Originally posted by ctt8410:
I think you're confused. We know the exact RPI formula and the NCAA releases rankings periodically on their website.Originally posted by TU_BLA:
Now most of the RPI systems try to mirror what the NCAA is going to do so they have stat guys crunching numbers and developing formulas they think that RPI system uses but in reality they are just guessing.
Thanks Ctt, wow I didn't realize their RPI was that low.Originally posted by ctt8410:
SMU finished 54th in the RPI last year. They were 23-9 and 4-6 against RPI top 50. Here's the money quote from the committee chair:
"SMU had an outstanding résumé but their non-conference strength of schedule was in the 300s, which is not very good obviously," Wellman said. "Their overall strength of schedule was 129. The next lowest strength of schedule in the field is 91, so there was quite a bit of difference between their strength of schedule and the other teams in the field."