Lunardi won't change Duke's #1 seed

drbubba

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2005
6,112
4,387
0
Somehow he's dropped UVa but not Duke. Anybody surprised? Arizona, Gonzaga, Wisconsin, and Villanova just sit there. The ESPN Duke loyalty is just ridiculous. I hope the committee has half a brain and moves them to #2. But then I also hope the Racers get a bid.
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
I wanted to see his brackets...did he show where he has UVA located? East?

He mentioned the current scenario avoids Wisconsin as UK's 2 and saves the committee face, but if the committee gives UK the top 2 seed in UVA it does not save them much face at all IMO.

I hope they put UVA in the East (it's 50 freaking miles difference between Cleveland and Cuse) and KU in the midwest with UK or Gonzaga....whichever.
 

BlueFE

Redshirt
Jan 13, 2010
3,178
0
0
While Duke does have some ugly L's hanging around their neck, they also have some gaudy wins, including that trip to UVA and rallying in the dying moments. UVA is staggering of late and their best player is banged up, which will all be factored in by the committee. So no, I am not surprised to see UVA on the two line behind Duke.

The interesting story is will that line stay the same if Arizona mauls Oregon tonight for the Pac 12 title? Gonzaga simply doesn't have the résumé to move up to a one.
 

Blueisbest

All-American
Mar 22, 2003
24,628
5,325
0
I think there is an unwritten rule that they have to have at least one ACC team as a #1 seed and that it almost always has to be Duke.
 

Rondoed

Junior
Jul 1, 2008
761
309
0
Duke could not even win their conference, nor their conference tournament. By all means, give them a #1 seed.
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
 

BlueFE

Redshirt
Jan 13, 2010
3,178
0
0
Originally posted by Blueisbest:

I think there is an unwritten rule that they have to have at least one ACC team as a #1 seed and that it almost always has to be Duke.
Would it be unreal if both got moved to the two line? I don't see it happening, but certain a case can be made that the 1's should look like: Kentucky, Wisconsin, Villanova and Arizona (worst L's and perhaps the weakest case for a 1 outside of Gonzaga, but not unfathomable, especially considering Duke's bad L's).
 

Goingfor9

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2003
15,725
2,380
113
Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
 

CloverforkCat

Junior
Jun 3, 2013
15,342
277
0
Duke is more deserving of a # 1 seed than UVA. They have wins at Wiscy, UVA, Louisville, and UNC. Virginia has lost 2 of their last 3. FWIW Lunardi has Wiscy as the 4th number 1 seed and Duke as the 3rd number 1 seed.
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
The first round games shouldn't matter. UVA could still go to the MIdwest region but play their first two games in Charlotte.
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
UVA will play its first two games in Charlotte no matter what region they are in.

I hope you are right...because based strictly on mileage they should put UVA in UK's bracket. I think it being a difference of like 50 miles between Syracuse and Cleveland from UVA's campus, and with a midwest 2 in KU out there (and not wanting to send them all the way to Syracuse, which is 1165 miles from KU's campus vs. 850-ish for Cleveland) they can surely justify sending UVA 50 miles further away to avoid being in Kentucky's bracket.
 

Rhavic

Heisman
Dec 15, 2014
33,316
23,520
68
Duke is better than Virginia, and I definitely don't mind UVA being in UK's bracket. Not sure if I see that happening, but I wouldn't mind.
Some of you are acting like geography is the only thing that matters.
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:

Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
UVA will play its first two games in Charlotte no matter what region they are in.

I hope you are right...because based strictly on mileage they should put UVA in UK's bracket. I think it being a difference of like 50 miles between Syracuse and Cleveland from UVA's campus, and with a midwest 2 in KU out there (and not wanting to send them all the way to Syracuse, which is 1165 miles from KU's campus vs. 850-ish for Cleveland) they can surely justify sending UVA 50 miles further away to avoid being in Kentucky's bracket.
I agree. It just makes sense from a logic standpoint to have them East considering others on the line. But it wouldn't shock me if they put them MW.

Without a healthy Anderson tho, UVA isn't that great. It's not the end of the world if they did pair them with us
 
Feb 3, 2006
9,078
42,421
0
Originally posted by CloverforkCat:
Duke is more deserving of a # 1 seed than UVA. They have wins at Wiscy, UVA, Louisville, and UNC. Virginia has lost 2 of their last 3. FWIW Lunardi has Wiscy as the 4th number 1 seed and Duke as the 3rd number 1 seed.
+1
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Originally posted by The_Answer1313:

Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:

Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
UVA will play its first two games in Charlotte no matter what region they are in.

I hope you are right...because based strictly on mileage they should put UVA in UK's bracket. I think it being a difference of like 50 miles between Syracuse and Cleveland from UVA's campus, and with a midwest 2 in KU out there (and not wanting to send them all the way to Syracuse, which is 1165 miles from KU's campus vs. 850-ish for Cleveland) they can surely justify sending UVA 50 miles further away to avoid being in Kentucky's bracket.
I agree. It just makes sense from a logic standpoint to have them East considering others on the line. But it wouldn't shock me if they put them MW.

Without a healthy Anderson tho, UVA isn't that great. It's not the end of the world if they did pair them with us
Yup, I am sure UVA's fans prefer driving an extra 45-50 minutes to Syracuse vs. having to face UK just to get to the Final Four. That's just IMO anyways. And plus, the committee would catch just as much flack for giving UK UVA and vice versa, as they did if they gave UK Wisconsin and vice versa, also JMO.
 

jameslee32

Heisman
Mar 26, 2009
33,652
22,340
83
NCAA: Even if dUKe was a 12 seed, they'd STILL play in the state of North Carolina.
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:

Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:

Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
UVA will play its first two games in Charlotte no matter what region they are in.

I hope you are right...because based strictly on mileage they should put UVA in UK's bracket. I think it being a difference of like 50 miles between Syracuse and Cleveland from UVA's campus, and with a midwest 2 in KU out there (and not wanting to send them all the way to Syracuse, which is 1165 miles from KU's campus vs. 850-ish for Cleveland) they can surely justify sending UVA 50 miles further away to avoid being in Kentucky's bracket.
I agree. It just makes sense from a logic standpoint to have them East considering others on the line. But it wouldn't shock me if they put them MW.

Without a healthy Anderson tho, UVA isn't that great. It's not the end of the world if they did pair them with us
Yup, I am sure UVA's fans prefer driving an extra 45-50 minutes to Syracuse vs. having to face UK just to get to the Final Four. That's just IMO anyways. And plus, the committee would catch just as much flack for giving UK UVA and vice versa, as they did if they gave UK Wisconsin and vice versa, also JMO.
I agree.

On a separate note, why is everyone automatically assuming that Villanova is the 2nd 1 seed?

Teams that are better than Villanova

UK
Wisconsin
Duke
Virginia
Arizona
 

Goingfor9

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2003
15,725
2,380
113
Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:

Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
UVA will play its first two games in Charlotte no matter what region they are in.

I hope you are right...because based strictly on mileage they should put UVA in UK's bracket. I think it being a difference of like 50 miles between Syracuse and Cleveland from UVA's campus, and with a midwest 2 in KU out there (and not wanting to send them all the way to Syracuse, which is 1165 miles from KU's campus vs. 850-ish for Cleveland) they can surely justify sending UVA 50 miles further away to avoid being in Kentucky's bracket.


If UVA ends up in MW they will be playing in Louisville. That's why they will go east
 

Tannerdad

Heisman
Mar 30, 2002
54,013
57,743
48
Why does everyone worry about Lunardi? He is very good at putting the particular teams in but is suspect on seedings. At least he has been.

I still think we get Zags as our 2. So we'll see.
 

Catlogic15

All-Conference
May 19, 2003
3,388
3,840
0
Originally posted by Rondoed:
Duke could not even win their conference, nor their conference tournament. By all means, give them a #1 seed.
I'm still using this logical approach.
It's been asked here many times in the last 24 hours; has any team ever that did not win its conference nor made its conference final, much less win, been awarded a #1 seed?
it makes no sense whatsoever.
 
Nov 15, 2008
38,645
57,515
0
Originally posted by ukbob:

Why does everyone worry about Lunardi? He is very good at putting the particular teams in but is suspect on seedings. At least he has been.

I still think we get Zags as our 2. So we'll see.
Exactly right, he's proven to be able to pick the field...seeds/locations, not so much.
 

It'saDoneDeal

All-Conference
Jul 24, 2007
19,260
4,446
113
Duke has the two best wins of any team in the country this year:

at Wisconsin
at Virginia when Virginia was playing at a very high level

I'd definitely drop Virginia from the one line before I'd drop Duke.
 

Cawood86_rivals

Heisman
Feb 20, 2005
36,711
64,715
0
Originally posted by Rondoed:
Duke could not even win their conference, nor their conference tournament. By all means, give them a #1 seed.
This. No team get propped up more than dUKe. It gets sickening.
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
Joe was just on, said the #1s will remain the same unless Villanova gets upset. Kentucky, Villanova, Wisconsin, and Duke.
 

BBCatsExile

Redshirt
Dec 8, 2014
71
0
0
Kentucky
Duke
Wisconsin
Arizona

This is what the committee wants. The foundation of an epic tournament.
 

HenryMuto

Heisman
Mar 31, 2012
18,872
12,257
113
Originally posted by drbubba:
Somehow he's dropped UVa but not Duke. Anybody surprised? Arizona, Gonzaga, Wisconsin, and Villanova just sit there. The ESPN Duke loyalty is just ridiculous. I hope the committee has half a brain and moves them to #2. But then I also hope the Racers get a bid.
I am pretty sure he could care less about the teams he ranks resumes. Duke has impressive resume of road wins. At Virginia and At Wisconsin are big.

The big question is can they get #1 seed without winning either the regular season or conf titles.

Duke should be ahead of Virginia based on actual resumes and Justin Anderson being currently injured and not playing well at all but will they be ahead of them when it gets announced who knows ?
 

fuzz77

All-Conference
Sep 19, 2012
12,163
1,423
0
Originally posted by catlogic15:

Originally posted by Rondoed:
Duke could not even win their conference, nor their conference tournament. By all means, give them a #1 seed.
I'm still using this logical approach.
It's been asked here many times in the last 24 hours; has any team ever that did not win its conference nor made its conference final, much less win, been awarded a #1 seed?
it makes no sense whatsoever.
Yes, UConn 2009. 3 Big East teams were given #1 seeds, UL, Pitt and UConn. UL won both the regular season and the tourney, played Pitt in the Big East tourney finals.
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
Originally posted by BBCatsExile:
Kentucky
Duke
Wisconsin
Arizona

This is what the committee wants. The foundation of an epic tournament.
Yeah, so then they can screw UK and give UK UVA as their 2 seed.

I'll pass on that, GO NOVA today!
 

TigerPawsSC

Redshirt
Nov 21, 2004
4,564
0
0
Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:
Originally posted by UKWildcats#8:

Originally posted by GOING FOR #9:

Originally posted by The_Answer1313:
Why does everyone assume UVA is going East?

I hate to say this but if they are the best 2 seed......

Distance to Midwest regional 290 miles
Distance to East regional 365 miles

I could see them ending up with UK.
2 seed in the east plays first two games in Charlotte. They would be the top 2 seed so the go to Charlotte rather than UL. UVA IMO is the 2 seed in the east with Villanova the 1 seed. Duke has beaten good teams including @ UVA and it is reflected in their RPI
UVA will play its first two games in Charlotte no matter what region they are in.

I hope you are right...because based strictly on mileage they should put UVA in UK's bracket. I think it being a difference of like 50 miles between Syracuse and Cleveland from UVA's campus, and with a midwest 2 in KU out there (and not wanting to send them all the way to Syracuse, which is 1165 miles from KU's campus vs. 850-ish for Cleveland) they can surely justify sending UVA 50 miles further away to avoid being in Kentucky's bracket.


If UVA ends up in MW they will be playing in Louisville. That's why they will go east
This is not how the first-round pod system works.

A handful of people have tried to explain this to you, to no avail.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
If Lumardi is right on the 1 seeds and they go by geography for the 2 seeds:

Midwest- UK/UVA
East- Nova/Zaga
South- Duke/KU
West- UW/Zona

UVA is the top 2 seed, stay closest to home (Cleveland). Zona is next. They stay out West. If KU wins tonight, then they are next and go to Houston. The Zags are displaced as the lowest 2 seed.

If they go S-curve:

Midwest- UK/Zaga
East- Nova/KU
South- Duke/Zona
West- UW/UVA

If they consider both and try to work out a hybrid of both (which they should):

Midwest- UK/Zaga
East- Nova/UVA
South- Duke/KU
West- UW/Zona

Zaga is going to be displaced anyhow, so send them to us as the lowest 2 seed. UVA has to travel an extra 100 miles or so, but remains close to home. KU stays close to home by default, Duke gets a weaker 2, but plays in KU's backyard. Zona stays out West, so the committee doesn't displace two top seeded teams from the West.
 

dnabbott25

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2003
9,332
1,550
0
Joey Brackets SAID he thinks Virginia goes east with nova. And, not sure where the mileage post came from, but the mileage they showed on espn shows a 49 mile difference for Virginia, to Cleveland and to Syracuse.

Either way, that's not what matters. Here's what does, Wisconsin gets a 1 and goes west, so Gonzaga as a 2 must go to the Midwest. Which then moves Virginia to east bracket,

ALSO (very big) Joey Brackets SAID that Arizona, if they win and win big COULD steal Dukes 1 seed (but likely not to happen). Arizona only lost 3 games, all close, all on the road and they have also won 10 straight,

This post was edited on 3/14 5:46 PM by Tyblue22
 
Nov 27, 2009
21,246
21,450
0
Has there ever been a team that didnt win the regular season conference title or the post season conference tournament that got a one seed+???? Please advise Lunardi.
 

BourbonBalz

All-American
Mar 5, 2005
11,430
9,235
0
Originally posted by It'saDoneDeal:
Duke has the two best wins of any team in the country this year:

at Wisconsin
at Virginia when Virginia was playing at a very high level

I'd definitely drop Virginia from the one line before I'd drop Duke.
They also have two bad losses where they were absolutely dominated and one was at home. Duke has three double digit losses, two of which were to teams that are NIT bound. Virginia has three total losses (one less than Duke), all to Top 20 teams by a total of around 10 points. Everyone keeps talking about Duke's big wins but conveniently omit their losses.
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Originally posted by Tyblue22:
Joey Brackets SAID he thinks Virginia goes east with nova. And, not sure where the mileage post came from, but the mileage they showed on espn shows a 49 mile difference for Virginia, to Cleveland and to Syracuse.

Either way, that's not what matters. Here's what does, Wisconsin gets a 1 and goes west, so Gonzaga as a 2 must go to the Midwest. Which then moves Virginia to east bracket,

ALSO (very big) Joey Brackets SAID that Arizona, if they win and win big COULD steal Dukes 1 seed (but likely not to happen). Arizona only lost 3 games, all close, all on the road and they have also won 10 straight,

This post was edited on 3/14 5:46 PM by Tyblue22
If Wisconsin is a 1 seed and is moved out West meaning they are the weakest 1 why would Arizona jump Duke instead of Wisconsin?

If right now he sees Duke being the 3rd 1 seed and Wisconsin the last, then why on earth would they knock Duke off the 1 line but keep Wisconsin on?

He's not making much sense.
 
A

anon_013cn8yrfncx2

Guest
Originally posted by It'saDoneDeal:
Duke has the two best wins of any team in the country this year:

at Wisconsin
at Virginia when Virginia was playing at a very high level

I'd definitely drop Virginia from the one line before I'd drop Duke.
Duke's 10 point win at Wisconsin came on the strength of 14 points by Suliamon, no longer with the team. Per guidelines, that win should be discounted same as losses when a player is not available.
 
Nov 27, 2009
21,246
21,450
0
Has there ever been a team that didnt win the regular season conference title or the post season conference tournament that got a one seed+???? Please advise Lunardi.

3/14 5:49 PM | IP: Logged
 
May 27, 2007
31,204
24,039
113
Originally posted by #1Wildcatfan4life:

Originally posted by It'saDoneDeal:
Duke has the two best wins of any team in the country this year:

at Wisconsin
at Virginia when Virginia was playing at a very high level

I'd definitely drop Virginia from the one line before I'd drop Duke.
They also have two bad losses where they were absolutely dominated and one was at home. Duke has three double digit losses, two of which were to teams that are NIT bound. Virginia has three total losses (one less than Duke), all to Top 20 teams by a total of around 10 points. Everyone keeps talking about Duke's big wins but conveniently omit their losses.
It brings up an interesting question on what the committee cares more about. Do they care more about big time wins or less "bad" losses.

The thing about the wins for Duke is they weren't just big wins but big wins on the road.

I also think UVA might drop to the 2 line because of the health of Anderson.