Major rule change coming - no clock stoppage on 1st downs

Soupbean

All-American
Jan 19, 2007
5,945
8,109
0
I can live with that I guess. They only stopped it for a few seconds anyway til they reset the chains which didnt take long. Really just took the one guy to set the new line of scrimmage marker then the chain guys could catch up later.

Now they just need to install a madatory 5 second wait before snapping the ball on each play after ball is set to give time for defense to at least lineup. The only exception would be in the final two minutes of each half when teams may need a hurry up snap to beat the game clock.

This would eliminate turnign the game into a cheap gimmick of who could get set before the other type thing instead of football. But it would still allow teams to play fast because 5 seconds is very fast after setting the ball. The defense would still have to hustle to get lined up and may not have time to sub, but at least it wouldnt be clown show.

Its a small adjustment that IMO would be enough to reduce the gimmickry. Referee just stands over the ball after placing it for 5 then its on. If defenses cant at least get somewhat lined up in that time then good for the hurry up offenses. But to not give them time to line up at all is just sillyness and not real competition.
 

NoDef

All-American
Sep 1, 2001
5,057
6,938
0
It's all about TV time and viewership. The long sports are all making or considering shortening the time it takes from start to finish. Baseball is actively doing it and Nascar is somewhat in that process. The NFL is great at ending the games in right around 3 hours. Honestly though, just cutting halftime would put the college game closer to that number. If you get two spread offenses out there that throw a lot then college games become close to four hours. I really don't have four hours to waste on a Saturday. Stoops pound the ground strategy usually does make our games faster than most..
 

seccats04

Heisman
Dec 6, 2004
13,985
21,741
113
I wish they would eliminate instant replay instead. Those take about 10 minutes every game and they never get the call correct anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Schwump

kygrandpa

Heisman
Mar 28, 2012
5,887
15,972
113
I wish they would eliminate instant replay instead. Those take about 10 minutes every game and they never get the call correct anyway.
They need to watch some of the XFL and USFL replay's they have to get this right... That is all they need and if you can't get it right then fire the one's making the call...

GBB
 
  • Like
Reactions: fabcat

Madcat62_rivals113839

All-Conference
Dec 27, 2016
3,874
4,616
0
It's all about TV time and viewership. The long sports are all making or considering shortening the time it takes from start to finish. Baseball is actively doing it and Nascar is somewhat in that process. The NFL is great at ending the games in right around 3 hours. Honestly though, just cutting halftime would put the college game closer to that number. If you get two spread offenses out there that throw a lot then college games become close to four hours. I really don't have four hours to waste on a Saturday. Stoops pound the ground strategy usually does make our games faster than most..
eliminating 10 minute replays would be the best ideal.
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
It's all about TV time and viewership. The long sports are all making or considering shortening the time it takes from start to finish. Baseball is actively doing it and Nascar is somewhat in that process. The NFL is great at ending the games in right around 3 hours. Honestly though, just cutting halftime would put the college game closer to that number. If you get two spread offenses out there that throw a lot then college games become close to four hours. I really don't have four hours to waste on a Saturday. Stoops pound the ground strategy usually does make our games faster than most..
Agree. Who likes tuning in to watch UK & find the the previous game is still on with 5 minutes to go? The small amount of reduced plays will also protect rosters from tiredness injuries by the same amount.
 

tdcat

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2002
11,863
1,853
0
Isn’t it really all those pesky commercial TO’s that drag a game out? I really think any saved time just creates space for more advertising money… I’m just too cynical I guess😂
A man who sees through the BS and gets to the real reason
 
  • Like
Reactions: trueblujr
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
That and shorten halftime. Hell you can make a restroom run and make you a quick bite to eat and the NFL halftime is over. In college it feels like the halftime lasts forever.

I guess it's because the bands get time. I'm not a band person either but I do think it would be unfair to those band kids to lose their time. Especially in favor of keeping tv timeouts every five seconds
 

Rockford

Heisman
Jun 28, 2001
21,680
44,842
83
Games are too long for TV

Solution…… less game and same amount of commercials

Great

Dollars always win
 

JHB4UK

Heisman
May 29, 2001
31,836
11,258
0
All replay reviews need to go to picture-in-picture commercials, to remove later tv timeout breaks. Or do picture-in-picture commercials on all extra points (since they are 99% successful).

A whole lot of ways to shorten the TV time while not taking away from actual football plays.
 

MrKentucky

Heisman
Mar 2, 2006
28,348
20,609
113
I guess it's because the bands get time. I'm not a band person either but I do think it would be unfair to those band kids to lose their time. Especially in favor of keeping tv timeouts every five seconds
It’s 100% the bands.


I personally don’t mind the longer halftime, mostly because I go to all of the home games. Gives me time to make a piss run and stand around and talk about the game with our friends who we don’t sit with. But that’s purely selfish :)
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
This. If they were serious about truly reducing length of games, the countless tv timeouts would be the first thing they'd cut
Then the money wouldn't be there for whatever programs in the schools that money funds. Administrators aren't that stupid.

Reduced clock stoppages results in fewer games/shorter games. Could also reduce quarters to 14 minutes to have fewer plays. All of these favors the teams with less depth. I'm all for evening up the competitive balance between teams.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,001
97,149
0
Then the money wouldn't be there for whatever programs in the schools that money funds. Administrators aren't that stupid.

Reduced clock stoppages results in fewer games/shorter games. Could also reduce quarters to 14 minutes to have fewer plays. All of these favors the teams with less depth. I'm all for evening up the competitive balance between teams.

Of course that's it and everyone knows it. That's why it's insulting for them to keep dancing around the obvious fact rather than just state the obvious
 

vhcat70

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
57,418
38,482
0
Of course that's it and everyone knows it. That's why it's insulting for them to keep dancing around the obvious fact rather than just state the obvious
Since it's the obvious fact to everyone, they aren't really dancing around it imo. They're doing what they can under the circumstances. I'd bet the the TV sponsors want the games done sooner for the same minutes of commercials.
 

K_TIME

Heisman
Jan 2, 2003
18,086
24,921
113
I prefer the college rule of stopping the clock to move the chains. Makes end of game situations more fun. Hate to see this go.
Disagree. It artificially changed the game for no reason. Having the chain sets has no impact for players on field and was a quasi TO for trial team.
 

Snarks

All-American
Jan 31, 2005
7,827
5,227
93
They’re not going to reduce commercials so I’m in favor of it. CFB games shouldn’t last 4hrs.