Did they get rid of desmond howard? How can they keep that guy?!At espn
Yes they did. That was so fun to watch. Sometimes it got so heated it looked like they were getting ready to go at it.Him and Trev used to have some epic battles when they were on together.
I could drink to thatany news on ed cunningham? then i'll pop some champagne
Go search the whole story. They only moved him off of one show onto another. You have to know they would never, ever fire Mark May. ESPN has **** in their own nest with their insistence of injecting politics into their coverage of what should be non-political sporting events. Now they pay the price with lower ratings and declining revenues...but they will never make a move that would be deemed as non politically correct!
false...this just isnt politics its more about how the consumption of sports is changing. More streaming options is the biggest reason. If politics was the actual reason for any of this then ESPN would have tanked in the mid 90s when Olbermann was anchoring the most popular Sportscenter everGo search the whole story. They only moved him off of one show onto another. You have to know they would never, ever fire Mark May. ESPN has **** in their own nest with their insistence of injecting politics into their coverage of what should be non-political sporting events. Now they pay the price with lower ratings and declining revenues...but they will never make a move that would be deemed as non politically correct!
50% of my desire to "cut the cord" has to do with the insane cost of paying for 80 channels I don't want (Golf Channel - really? I don't golf). The other 50% is having to pay for channels that do not align with my values. The political slant of ESPN and other stations definitely is a factor in me wanting to "cut the cord". Whether that translates into layoffs, I can't say. But rather than some ESPN turd lecturing me about (so called) AGW during the Olympics, I would rather just read a good book.The political slant of ESPN had little if anything to do with these layoffs.
They are losing viewership because people are cutting the cord on cable as a whole.
50% of my desire to "cut the cord" has to do with the insane cost of paying for 80 channels I don't want (Golf Channel - really? I don't golf). The other 50% is having to pay for channels that do not align with my values. The political slant of ESPN and other stations definitely is a factor in me wanting to "cut the cord". Whether that translates into layoffs, I can't say. But rather than some ESPN turd lecturing me about (so called) AGW during the Olympics, I would rather just read a good book.
Ok so you are maybe 1% of the cord cutters. The other 99% are cutting to save costs and not pay for what they don't want.
Regardless, I said the political slant had little to nothing to do with it, I guess counting your boycott, I am still correct with my statement little to nothing.
Linda Cohn disagrees with you, but what does she know, she only works there. Every article I've read about the layoffs at ESPN that allows commentary on it also all disagree with you.