Congrats to Nick! Great work, let’s run it back next year!
Incredible. He had an amazing season and I hope he has another in purple.Congrats to Nick! Great work, let’s run it back next year!
Does anyone know how the academic part is measured? Does it account for the difficulty of a player's coursework or the academic rigor of the university?
I would guess GPAs, maybe credit hours, major, and other things like fellowships are listed on the form. So a kid who was a star on the court while gettin g a 3.9 GPA (I made that number up) while majoring in a "real" major at a renowned academic institution is going to be more impressive than a kid with a 3.6 in kinesiology at UTEP.If I summarized their flyer correct (obtained at the College Sports Communicators website, who implements Academic-All America)
Per your question, prez - I don't think there's a "degree of difficulty" (no pun intended) rating based on major, educational institution, etc. It just seems to me that there's a list of nominees, then they are culled by committee selection, and then later voted by the body at-large.
- Communications directors nominate the student athlete for All-District recognition ("must have minimum 3.5 GPA, and meet high athletic standards.")
- From there, they set up a national ballot where CSC members vote on the teams.
- I assume that since they are divided by level (D1, D2, etc), that CSC members are limited to vote to their level.
What's unknown to me: is there a level of "campaigning" like there is for the Oscars, where members take out ads in trade publications. (i.e. "For Your Consideration, Nick Martinelli" and there's like a gif of him hitting the game winning shot vs the Terps, or whatever...")