Matt just said on KSR
- Thread starter catfan111
- Start date
Matt Jones is clueless. Petrino was one of the 2 UL football GRaduate assistants just like every school has and they are allowed to help coach in practice. That is what they are for. Learning to coach. They just cannot recruit.
In past years UL had a GA helping to coach the Qb's.
I think we don't really know that, particularly on this subject and from this poster.
Matt Jones is a Duke trained lawyer who graduated at the top oh his class. He knows the NCAA rule book. If Matt said he commited a vialation, he committed a violation
No he is correct. Whenever you take a photo or create artwork you do own a copyright on that work. While its true most online image hosting services do ask you to give them the rights to display your work you are not giving up your ownership of that work but are merely giving them the right to show it. Typically this only becomes an issue in court cases where art is used for commercial purposes or in a defamation case.
For example the most common use I see are photographers. They often watermark the photo proofs they send to clients so they can pick and choose which ones they'd like to order. By sending the client those photo proofs they are not giving up ownership of those images for print or web distribution (about half my facebook newsfeed I'm looking at you). Most photographers charge extra to get the rights to their work and thats why if you look on the back of most professional photos they have the photographers contact information. Another example is sports photography, KSR was threatened with a lawsuit for using unlicensed images on its ad supported commercial blog by increasingly irrelevant print newspapers.
Now all of this likely would not apply to posting someones family pics in a message board thread, that I just feel is bad karma but is just to illustrate that technically you don't give up the rights to your image because you uploaded it to the internet.
There is a huge difference with commercial gain. Watermarking and poor man copyrighting is not the same as placing a photo on the Internet for others' noncommercial use.
Indeed, which I covered in the last 2 sentences. I feel its just distasteful to bring the wife into it. Well unless its Brett Bielemas wife in a Bikini. Then I have no problem with that. While it was no where near as disgusting or distasteful (the original poster was actually just going for man card comedy) It creepily reminds me to much of Zipp photoshopping peoples children. Shes not a public figure and its not like we really need to bring her onto the board to mock the Petrinos, the men in that family give us enough material as it is.
Its not an important thing, and the joke made here isn't even bad.
Last edited:
You must feel like James Bond, or a secret agent man ....the burden you had to bare holding that private information. Thankfully its come to be public knowledge releasing you to tell the truth.
You people are so full of [poop][poop][poop]