What are you talking about? I don't see a single similarity here. We're not trying to run Marrow off, we want him to stay and if he leaves there won't be severance pay.Originally posted by jauk11:
It better not be another case like the one where we kept the "Co" DC on in order to save the severance pay.
I hope there isn't any similarity, but for ten years mitch spent the bare minimum he could on football, which ended up costing UK millions. I hope that taught him something.Originally posted by gossie21:
What are you talking about? I don't see a single similarity here. We're not trying to run Marrow off, we want him to stay and if he leaves there won't be severance pay.Originally posted by jauk11:
It better not be another case like the one where we kept the "Co" DC on in order to save the severance pay.
Pretty much.Originally posted by JayCatz44:
If Marrow leaves then UK's recruiting goes down the![]()
Easier said than done. If Stoops had a replacement as good or better than Marrow then he would be on staff right now.Originally posted by catben:
Would hate to lose Coach Marrow, but Coach Stoops is from Ohio and has all of the contacts that we need to keep the recruiting momentum going. I realize that coach Marrow is one of the best in the country, but it's easier losing him now than it would have been a year ago. I hope he stays, we need him, but I'm sure Coach Stoops has a replacement in mind if he decides to go to UM.
Okay, so what is the similarity? Other than Mitch Barnhart is cheap and just the worst, how is there a single similarity between trying to keep Marrow, and trying to fire Brown?Originally posted by jauk11:
I hope there isn't any similarity, but for ten years mitch spent the bare minimum he could on football, which ended up costing UK millions. I hope that taught him something.Originally posted by gossie21:
What are you talking about? I don't see a single similarity here. We're not trying to run Marrow off, we want him to stay and if he leaves there won't be severance pay.Originally posted by jauk11:
It better not be another case like the one where we kept the "Co" DC on in order to save the severance pay.
And I don't understand your post, of course we don't want to run Marrow off, but mitch wouldn't fire the other guy because he would have been paying him plus the new guy.
Someone that knows comment ... But I read or heard (or maybe I dreamt it) that coaching salaries are from top down....Originally posted by usa1000:
UK will pay him whatever it takes to keep him. My guess is Marrow ends up in the 400k range next year.
I didn't use the word similarity, you did.Originally posted by gossie21:
Okay, so what is the similarity? Other than Mitch Barnhart is cheap and just the worst, how is there a single similarity between trying to keep Marrow, and trying to fire Brown?Originally posted by jauk11:
I hope there isn't any similarity, but for ten years mitch spent the bare minimum he could on football, which ended up costing UK millions. I hope that taught him something.Originally posted by gossie21:
What are you talking about? I don't see a single similarity here. We're not trying to run Marrow off, we want him to stay and if he leaves there won't be severance pay.Originally posted by jauk11:
It better not be another case like the one where we kept the "Co" DC on in order to save the severance pay.
And I don't understand your post, of course we don't want to run Marrow off, but mitch wouldn't fire the other guy because he would have been paying him plus the new guy.
Stoops can also make Marrow the Associate Head Coach and pay Marrow whatever he thinks he is worth. Pretty easy solution.Originally posted by robo222:
Someone that knows comment ... But I read or heard (or maybe I dreamt it) that coaching salaries are from top down....Originally posted by usa1000:
UK will pay him whatever it takes to keep him. My guess is Marrow ends up in the 400k range next year.
The more the HC makes then the more there can be for everyone... Can't pay an assistant more than the OC or DC... A hierarchal pay structure I guess it would be called... So if UK is going to pay Vince 400K but UM offers 600K then UK has been anted out of the game... Shannon's pay is reported to be 500K... Unless Mitch Barnhart is more the poker player than we ever thought he was the UK football staff is easy pickens for any program wanting to buy a good card..........
Money talks..... Your call Mitch?
You used the word "like" which is actually a stronger word than "similar." "Like" in the context you used it means equivalent, matching, same, etc. But thanks, I always enjoy a good English lesson intertwined with Mitch bashing.Originally posted by jauk11:
I didn't use the word similarity, you did.Originally posted by gossie21:
Okay, so what is the similarity? Other than Mitch Barnhart is cheap and just the worst, how is there a single similarity between trying to keep Marrow, and trying to fire Brown?Originally posted by jauk11:
I hope there isn't any similarity, but for ten years mitch spent the bare minimum he could on football, which ended up costing UK millions. I hope that taught him something.Originally posted by gossie21:
What are you talking about? I don't see a single similarity here. We're not trying to run Marrow off, we want him to stay and if he leaves there won't be severance pay.Originally posted by jauk11:
It better not be another case like the one where we kept the "Co" DC on in order to save the severance pay.
And I don't understand your post, of course we don't want to run Marrow off, but mitch wouldn't fire the other guy because he would have been paying him plus the new guy.
But the point I am making is that, as you just said, "Mitch Barnhart is cheap and just the worst" (for the 10 years before the strike, and for football only), and the "similarity" is him not paying the money to do the right thing for football.
Personally I think he has to have learned something and won't repeat that mistake, although he might have burned some bridges with Marrow by giving him the same raise and promotion guaranteed him if he had only signed one two star recruit.
Whether he can coach or not (and I believe he can) Marrow is probably doing more for what ails UK football than any other coach on the staff except for Stoops.
You blame Vince not anyone else if he leaves. If he does get raise and added whatever than nothing else you can do. I would have real problem with Vince, I know I would rather work for my best friend or one of closest friends since childhood than to work for a coach I have never met or worked for, a place I am not familiar with even though Michigan is great place and great tradition. I would still rather be SEC school recruiting Ohio than to be Michigan, Mich. St. Wisconsin, recruiting Ohio. The idea that UK has ponied up for 3 years would factor.Originally posted by bigbluemist:
Why if UK offers more than UM and he still goes? Who you all going to blame? Of course people will never hear the offer of the school that, "loses"
At significantly more money! I was wondering the same thing mrschwump.Originally posted by mrschwump:
Let me see if I understand.. If someone comes along and offers you a job, or a new job, some of you won't listen? Is that right?
I'd like to think this is the case. If Marrow and Stoops are as close as everyone says this could be seen as smart move on Stoops part. On the flip side, if UK offers the same money and he still leaves that would be a dagger. I realize it's Michigan but Stoops has been given a lot of program changing upgrades as well as $$$. The outcome of this will say a lot about our future IMO.Originally posted by *Bleedingblue*:
I guess you can look at it like this.... Marrow is getting his name out their and its more appealing to recruits and his resume that Michigan and other schools want him.
I'm sure Stoops urged him to go even though he is going no where because it is showing how good some of our staff is.