You make good points, but there is one key factor that you’re leaving out: Collins is from Chicago! Why would someone take NU over USC with everything else being equal? they wouldn’t. But everything was not equal, Collins is from here, his dad was the coach of the Bulls, it was a chance for him to come home (and make millions) AND climb the Everest of college basketball.We’re talking comparatively between available choices. As in why would someone take the NU job over USC for example, if the assumption is that NU is so challenging that it is a career killer. Collins wasn’t going to go from Duke to Appalachian State. He would be at another P6 program if not at NU. The NU job has no significant advantages in pay, media, or prestige when compared against its peers. So my point is that taking the NU job, based on what you are arguing, would have been *solely* for the challenge of it, since it has no other major benefits when compared to a peer job, outside of location I suppose. A job so challenging that it has a chance of derailing your entire career. That’s just not what rational people do, even those that enjoy challenges. Therefore the conclusion is that either Collins was delusional and wrong about the depth of the challenge that NU presented, or the challenges of the program are overblown and the reason for Collins’ struggles are that he’s not very good at coaching.
my original point is that the NU job offers a draw for the right candidate AND at the same time its a very very difficult place to win consistently
Last edited: