Mills

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
Kid needs more touches. If I were him I wouldn’t be thrilled by the McCafferey at RB cute ****.

Thompkins needs feeding too
 

BleedRed78

Redshirt
Oct 22, 2019
3,466
0
0
Kid needs more touches. If I were him I wouldn’t be thrilled by the McCafferey at RB cute ****.

Thompkins needs feeding too

I loved McCaffrey in there but I have agree. Keep him in at WR. We clearly need the help there...
 

jimmyjoseph

All-Conference
Jun 18, 2020
4,574
3,884
113
I loved McCaffrey in there but I have agree. Keep him in at WR. We clearly need the help there...
Mccaffrey definitely is explosive enough to try to get touches but they may just be trying to keep him from transferring so trying to get him touches.
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
I loved McCaffrey in there but I have agree. Keep him in at WR. We clearly need the help there...
I doubt we will see the same thing for the rest of the year. McCaffery is just very very versatile and the coaches needed to find a strategic advantage today to keep OSU guessing.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,472
2,013
113
Kid needs more touches. If I were him I wouldn’t be thrilled by the McCafferey at RB cute ****.

Thompkins needs feeding too
Get better and you won't have to worry about it. McCaffrey is our biggest play threat, and was our best option at running back today.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
I doubt we will see the same thing for the rest of the year. McCaffery is just very very versatile and the coaches needed to find a strategic advantage today to keep OSU guessing.
I think this is probably accurate
 

Mrs.Jeans15

Heisman
May 5, 2018
25,597
40,940
0
Get better and you won't have to worry about it. McCaffrey is our biggest play threat, and was our best option at running back today.

When he got touches he was getting 5 yards a pop.we didnt give it to our backs enough.
 

NikkiSixx_rivals269993

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2013
9,783
2,445
0
I doubt we will see the same thing for the rest of the year. McCaffery is just very very versatile and the coaches needed to find a strategic advantage today to keep OSU guessing.
I am thinking quite the opposite..

this is the blueprint.

Frost loves this kind of stuff.. dialing up all kinds of cute plays, at the expense of actually establishing any kind of running game or offensive plan. It's all about quick strike, except no WR to do that, so we are one dimensional with no real running game approach, it's just free lance kind of stuff.

at least that is what we saw today.. and it netted us 17 points.. why would you stray away from that?

(Obviously I am trying to show how stupid of an approach this was today)
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
I am thinking quite the opposite..

this is the blueprint.

Frost loves this kind of stuff.. dialing up all kinds of cute plays, at the expense of actually establishing any kind of running game or offensive plan. It's all about quick strike, except no WR to do that, so we are one dimensional with no real running game approach, it's just free lance kind of stuff.

at least that is what we saw today.. and it netted us 17 points.. why would you stray away from that?

(Obviously I am trying to show how stupid of an approach this was today)
Have to consider the circumstances. The 2 legitimate deep threats we have to spread the field vertically weren't ready to go, so if we had gone with a traditional running attack we would have been very one dimensional. The only chance we had was to outmanuever OSU with unpredictable strategy. Yes, Frost gets pretty cutesy sometimes but I think this was somewhat out of necessity.
 

TheBeav815

All-American
Feb 19, 2007
18,955
5,101
0
Yeah it's one thing to mix it up and get Luke touches. It's another to have your #1 RB look like he's maybe 5th on your priority list. That ain't gonna get it.

Suuuuper cutesy today, they looked like a team that didn't think they could beat OSU straight up so they had to have a gimmick fest.
 

Mack In Motion

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
5,998
3,531
113
Yeah it's one thing to mix it up and get Luke touches. It's another to have your #1 RB look like he's maybe 5th on your priority list. That ain't gonna get it.

Suuuuper cutesy today, they looked like a team that didn't think they could beat OSU straight up so they had to have a gimmick fest.
I don't think there was anyone, anywhere, that thought we were going to beat OSU straight up today.
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
Yeah it's one thing to mix it up and get Luke touches. It's another to have your #1 RB look like he's maybe 5th on your priority list. That ain't gonna get it.

Suuuuper cutesy today, they looked like a team that didn't think they could beat OSU straight up so they had to have a gimmick fest.
I suppose we could have tried to just pound it up the middle all game long, but I doubt the outcome would have been any better. The fact of the matter is that Mills is a serviceable back but not probably the type of playmaker that can carry a team against what we faced today. Truth be told, I was more disappointed in how we used Wandale than Mills.
 

Mrs.Jeans15

Heisman
May 5, 2018
25,597
40,940
0
Yeah it's one thing to mix it up and get Luke touches. It's another to have your #1 RB look like he's maybe 5th on your priority list. That ain't gonna get it.

Suuuuper cutesy today, they looked like a team that didn't think they could beat OSU straight up so they had to have a gimmick fest.

They didnt have to.. Our O line wasnt afraid of them.
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,472
2,013
113
Yeah it's one thing to mix it up and get Luke touches. It's another to have your #1 RB look like he's maybe 5th on your priority list. That ain't gonna get it.

Suuuuper cutesy today, they looked like a team that didn't think they could beat OSU straight up so they had to have a gimmick fest.
We weren't going to beat OSU running Mills straight up the middle. Luke gave us our best chance to win from that spot, that's why he was out there.
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,396
15,545
113
Kid needs more touches. If I were him I wouldn’t be thrilled by the McCafferey at RB cute ****.

Thompkins needs feeding too


Agreed completely. I like the McCaffery changeup here and there but today was a bit too cute for my liking as well. Honestly I'd rather have seen McCaffery out wide at WR. At least then the safety's would've had to respect the threat of a deep ball.

Holla
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,396
15,545
113
Get better and you won't have to worry about it. McCaffrey is our biggest play threat, and was our best option at running back today.

Not sure I agree with that. If that's the case make him a damn RB. I think we both know better than that.


Holla
 

Kakdawg

Heisman
Sep 8, 2004
35,396
15,545
113
Exactly, so why would it be any different next week or the week after that?


It will be different for sure. That take was a bad one from the beginning. If he's the best chance to win at RB they would put him at RB and give it to him 20-25 times. We all know better than that.


Holla
 

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
We gave it to mills 9 times. He’s better than that. And twice I felt like AM gave it to him in a poorly read zone read where he was running into 3 defenders.
Frost neglected Ozigbo and Mills (last year) for the front end of the season. Only to use them appropriately towards the end when the Ws are in the books. OSUs D wasn’t super crazy. Our OL could move them. Wish we could establish some more traditional running
 

oldjar07

All-Conference
Oct 25, 2009
9,472
2,013
113
Exactly, so why would it be any different next week or the week after that?
The only chance we have of playing with a team like Ohio State is making big plays and Luke provides that. With Mills you can grind out drives against the less talented teams.
 

Suhrreal

All-Conference
Jun 1, 2009
7,380
1,049
0
I believe OSU's gameplan wanted to take Mills out of the game and make our QBs keep the ball. Similar to what we were doing with Fields as the announcers mentioned. It worked out a lot better for them. They forced 2 fumbles by our QBs including one returned for a TD. Mills was swarmed quite a few times when he was given the ball. That would explain his production today. We gained 210 yards on the ground against a title contender. Doesn't matter how you get it.

Mills will get his time to shine this season.
 

leodisflowers

Senior
Feb 25, 2011
14,801
808
0
I am thinking quite the opposite..

this is the blueprint.

Frost loves this kind of stuff.. dialing up all kinds of cute plays, at the expense of actually establishing any kind of running game or offensive plan. It's all about quick strike, except no WR to do that, so we are one dimensional with no real running game approach, it's just free lance kind of stuff.

at least that is what we saw today.. and it netted us 17 points.. why would you stray away from that?

(Obviously I am trying to show how stupid of an approach this was today)
I get your pessimism but we just played a legit title contender and were in the game for a long time. We weren’t going to beat them, but there was a chance it could have been 17-14 at half without side from the officials. We moved the ball pretty well at times just had some errors. I hate losing but I already think we look better and this is the first time we’ve had a game since November of last year. We’re you expecting to win? I actually saw some bright spots.
 

Shoxsker

Sophomore
Feb 10, 2014
1,670
170
58
Kid needs more touches. If I were him I wouldn’t be thrilled by the McCafferey at RB cute ****.

Thompkins needs feeding too
You're not wrong but he didnt light the world on fire when in there. Expect a pass off of Luke in the backfield after establishing him running. As early as this week.
 

NebChicago

Sophomore
Oct 14, 2009
3,565
141
0
Can Mills catch the ball out of the backfield? Let's get him the ball somemore. Also help him get drafted.