The sad part is that Cincinnati's policing has actually been a pretty good model of race relations and community based policing since the reforms brought on by the 2001 riots.
And a UC rent-a-cop blew it, because the Cincinnati cops weren't protecting their own beat around UC's campus. So the big business of UC had their cops patrolling off campus neighborhoods.
Not sure I agree with the last part, but this is correct to some extent. Policing improved city-wide in response to the 2001 riots because Cincinnati Police entered into a consent decree with the Department of Justice. But Tensing worked for UC Police, who
weren't subject to the decree's requirements.
And Tensing
led the department in number of stops, citations, and arrests in the year prior to the Dubose shooting. He also had the highest racial disparity among those he stopped of any UC officer. This was in part because UC Chief of Police Jason Goodrich implemented a policy encouraging more stops and arrests, but his numbers are striking.
These cases are tough. As someone else suggested, I'd like to see the prosecutor add an obstruction charge or something similar and go for it one more time. I suspect they left it out initially because they didn't want to give the jury an out on something that carries less time. But that's extremely frustrating when you consider how prosecutors typically over-charge defendants with everything under the sun to ensure that they at least get some kind of conviction.