I think Jerry Carino mentioned that he might start at the 4. If he does who starts at the 1,2 and 3?
Jerry has been wrong about every one of his predictions over the past few seasons. Wouldn’t read into anything he says FWIW. Scarlet Nation podcast projects Miteo as a deep reserve piece.
I think Carino could be correct on this one. Ware will likely almost never play, and Buca did not come here for one year to be the third string 5. Yes, Pike played Buchanan and Dortch at the 5, but our starting 5 was pretty weak. Buca, our back up 5 probably offers more than our starting 5 last year. Pike likes to mix and match, but I think it's more likely you see Miteo and Gurdak on the court at same time than otherwise. It will also make us more competitive rebounding wise in the Big 10, a Pike concern, and It allows Garavaglia, an inexperienced yet extremely talented 19 year old, to focus on the 3 spot, probably his natural position. Aside from Buchanan, I think a guy who sees a significant reduction in playing time might be Smith. It's not like last year - these two Euros are really good. They might even create a log jam at the 1 & 2. Not entirely sure how good our guards are, but we have too many of them.He’s listed on our website as 6-10 and 260 lb. If he earns PT, my opinion is it will to relieve Gurdak (listed 6-10 and 265 lb - over Buca or Ware (who is shorter and weighs less than him). Pike has no problem playing guys like Buchanan or Dortch at the 5 so this just seems the most logical spot he’d earn time.
I'd be surprised if Buchanan ever plays the 5, and I think Miteo moves his feet really well.I’d wager we see Buchanan at the 5 more often than him at the 4. He’s intriguing but just cause someone isn’t completely lacking in skill means they can play PF. And anyways, Pike works best with 4 guys on the perimeter that can legitimately move their feet out there and Miteo is far far away from that. I don’t understand this obsession with getting a Derrick Favors type four, that just isn’t Pikes style and Will Sydnor is absolutely 4 sized and actually provides promise in the modern game, weird he’s considered anything but a 4 for us next year.
Who? Miteo? The only position he’s played in his career is at the 5, he’s not a good shooter, high center of gravity and is raw, but also as big as any center we have. He’s a 5. There’s like literally zero chance he’s anything other than our center.I'd be surprised if he ever plays the 5.
No, you said Buchanan, and you're zero chance of of Miteo playing other than the 5 is more like 70%. I expect you'll see him and Gurdak on the court at the same time quite often.Who? Miteo? The only position he’s played in his career is at the 5, he’s not a good shooter, high center of gravity and is raw, but also as big as any center we have. He’s a 5. There’s like literally zero chance he’s anything other than our center.
No, you said Buchanan, and you're zero chance of of Miteo playing other than the 5 is more like 70%. I expect you'll see him and Gurdak on the court at the same time quite often.
You've got Gurdak, Buca, Miteo, Buchanan & Ware, all playing the 5. It's not called the 5 because you need 5 guys there. Not sure you know what you're looking at. Pike WILL play them at the same time, how much depends on how effective Sydnor and Buchanan are at the 4. Miteo and Garavaglia are both legit regardless of how late their pick ups were.
Here's my team:
1 - Mark/Davis
2 - Francis/Jones
3 - Garavaglia/Jones/Powers
4 - Miteo or Sydnor/Buchanan
5 - Gurdak/Buca
Don't make it too complicated.
Personally, I think Buchanan was made for down a level.Nobody said Buchanan would play 5 this year. But Pike was willing to put him there last year so Miteo could certainly be an option there (bigger and weighs more) if he’s better than other options.
Again - you have no basis for thinking he’s going to beat out Buchanan and Sydnor for minutes. The competition that he produced at isn’t D1 level. Not even low major. Now yes, it was probably better than typical high school level which parallel’s his age but every high major recruit has nice looking high school numbers. At this point we have no idea.
Personally, I think Buchanan was made for down a level.
There won't be much of an adjustment for good defenders to play in Pike's defense. Man defense is man defense. As far as Miteo is concerned, he'll be a better shot blocker and rebounder than Buchanan right off the bat. If everyone is so sure of Pike's ability to teach defense, the rest will come pretty quickly.Buchanan plays defense. It’s highly unlikely that the new guys not known for D are going to come in and beat him out for much time next season (Smith, Miteo, Martin). Even for guys who were good previously on D (Jones, Sydnor) there could be a learning curve in the system.
Diego I put in a different category. He’s a guy who, kind of like Nwuli but at a much higher proven level, earned time and was high on scouting reports because of his defense specifically. For this reason, I’m very bullish at him carving out a major role in the rotation.
Might make sense for Pikiel to go to a zone when Buca comes in. Doubt he’ll do well defending the perimeter or on switches.There won't be much of an adjustment for good defenders to play in Pike's defense. Man defense is man defense. As far as Miteo is concerned, he'll be a better shot blocker and rebounder than Buchanan right off the bat. If everyone is so sure of Pike's ability to teach defense, the rest will come pretty quickly.
Watching the highlights, no way is he 260. I don't see him as a 4, but possible in spot minutes. If another team has two bigs, including one that steps outside, it's possible.He’s listed on our website as 6-10 and 260 lb. If he earns PT, my opinion is it will to relieve Gurdak (listed 6-10 and 265 lb - over Buca or Ware (who is shorter and weighs less than him). Pike has no problem playing guys like Buchanan or Dortch at the 5 so this just seems the most logical spot he’d earn time.
Watching the highlights, no way is he 260. I don't see him as a 4, but possible in spot minutes. If another team has two bigs, including one that steps outside, it's possible.
Tonejc is listed as 6'7" and 6'9" in his Rutgers bio. A few years ago, walk-on was listed at 5'10" and 6'2" in his Rutgers bio.He’s listed on our website as 6-10 and 260 lb. If he earns PT, my opinion is it will to relieve Gurdak (listed 6-10 and 265 lb - over Buca or Ware (who is shorter and weighs less than him). Pike has no problem playing guys like Buchanan or Dortch at the 5 so this just seems the most logical spot he’d earn time.
I like it, except its 11 man rotation instead of 10You've got Gurdak, Buca, Miteo, Buchanan & Ware, all playing the 5. It's not called the 5 because you need 5 guys there. Not sure you know what you're looking at. Pike WILL play them at the same time, how much depends on how effective Sydnor and Buchanan are at the 4. Miteo and Garavaglia are both legit regardless of how late their pick ups were.
Here's my team:
1 - Mark/Davis
2 - Francis/Jones
3 - Garavaglia/Jones/Powers
4 - Miteo or Sydnor/Buchanan
5 - Gurdak/Buca
Don't make it too complicated.
Tonejc is listed as 6'7" and 6'9" in his Rutgers bio. A few years ago, walk-on was listed at 5'10" and 6'2" in his Rutgers bio.
I think Powers will contribute at the 2/3.
Then it's a conspiracy. He was listed at 6'10" on other sites before he even got to Rutgers.Oh, I’m sure his measurements, like everyone else’s on our site, are exaggerated. It was a relative point. He’s listed as 6-10 and 260. Gurdak is listed as 6-10 and 265. Ware is listed as 6-9 and 255. It’s unlikely he weighs less than them, and certainly weighs more than Buchanan who is listed at 240.
A good question. I can only guess at the answer - Smith and Powers. I know the foul situation can change things, but I like the idea of everyone playing only one position, especially early in the season. I think it will help us gel as a team quicker so we can avoid those "what the f " losses early in the year. I kept that in mind when I constructed "my team" above, with only Jones playing more than one position. There is less for everyone to think about (no changing responsibilities) and so everything runs faster and more crisply. Players won't have to think as much when it comes to where they're supposed to be on an in bounds play, in the offense, or in the press or press attacks. With all the substitutions last year, Francis moving to the point, then Buchanan to the 5, or Dortch back and forth between the 4 and 5, sometimes we looked like a Chinese fire drill. Not a good recipe. We've got the positional talent to play this way and get out to a fast start.I like it, except its 11 man rotation instead of 10
also, I see that you have also left Smith off which would make it 12
Players are going to have give 110% effort, and be 110% mentally focuesd for playing time this year, which I believe will be a positive for this team
Pike has been known for quick hooks for defensive lapses, which players do you think this will affect the most ?
A good question. I can only guess at the answer - Smith and Powers. I know the foul situation can change things, but I like the idea of everyone playing only one position, especially early in the season. I think it will help us gel as a team quicker so we can avoid those "what the f " losses early in the year. I kept that in mind when I constructed "my team" above, with only Jones playing more than one position. There is less for everyone to think about (no changing responsibilities) and so everything runs faster and more crisply. Players won't have to think as much when it comes to where they're supposed to be on an in bounds play, in the offense, or in the press or press attacks. With all the substitutions last year, Francis moving to the point, then Buchanan to the 5, or Dortch back and forth between the 4 and 5, sometimes we looked like a Chinese fire drill. Not a good recipe. We've got the positional talent to play this way and get out to a fast start.