Mitt....
- Thread starter bornaneer
- Start date
So I suppose, by you trumpers logic, those voting to "convict" will be bi-partisan.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Confused—-thought Mitt had said he WOULD vote to convict and make this impeachment a bilateral process ( involving BOTH republicans and democrats). Has he recently flipped? Please clarify.
THANKS
How and or why is that odd? He would still want to hear any additional info for other article, no?
There are 2 articles of impeachment. He is voting for removal on abuse of power and against removal for obstruction of Congress. At least that's what I think he is saying at this point.
He will vote guilty on the Abuse of Power Article.....and not guilty on the Obstruction of Congress Article.
True.....but his not guilty reasoning seems to be in conflict with his vote for Senate additional witnesses.
Fing mormons, what do they say to one wife and then to the nother? How do they keep it straight.:smiley:
Again, additional witnesses to help the defense on the other article. He said as much.
When he voted for more witnesses did he say in respect to which article? I don't know, I didn't follow along that closely. Doesn't matter either eay.
I believe the Clinton Rules would only allow for an additional week of witnesses and/or production of documents.
I'm glad you openly admit that nothing discovered would have mattered anyway, He would always be let off by Senate Rs.
He can’t keep it straight. He’s a limp noodle that could never satisfy more than one wife. By the way, who really gives a sh!!t how he votes. #Mr Irrelevant.
I’m more interested in how Joe Manchin & Doug Jones vote.
You need some rest......your incoherent babbling is really sad......I have NEVER made any comments about anything regarding "bi-partisan".
Mitt was profiting off of the Ukraine as well. Give it time. He doesn’t want any more visibility into Ukraine than Biden does. His vote sets him up as a “political rival” as well.
Jones has already said earlier today he will vote to convict. Manchin not tipping his hat until he votes. He votes to convict probably dooms him in the Senate. I bet Schumer wants him to vote no, but will never admit it. Jones is history and depending how Manchin votes will determine his future. Manchin is already on his 9th life.
Great, libs are now into moral victories of having the far right leaning Romney vote with them, as they lose.
Libs will take anything close to a win. Game over, they lost and know it. Unto trying to sideline Sanders.
Cause there's nothing there. Clinton perjured himself, asked others to perjure themselves and he was acquitted too. Clinton's had a crime for which he was disbarred. PRetty serious but if he wasn't impeached, the PResident would have to kill somebody, like drone a citizen in a foreign country to be impeached, correct?
Amazing how many of the swamp people have offspring, legitimate and illegitimate, dipping into foreign govt kickbacks.
What a jackass! Never enough fences for him to straddle.
Is it possible for McConnell to exclude him from ALL (or nearly all) committee positions when the Republicans retain (or grow their majority in ) the Senate? Would be more than fitting to see this RINO (Democrat) on the outside looking in . I like the overtures coming from Utah State legislators who are introducing bills to have recall of US Senators.
Some non=profit group should send each member of congress a copy of he constitution next July 4th and encourage them ALL to read it. They might also provide skilled tutors to help those (seems to be, particularly, Dems) who are particularly unskilled at reading comprehension. Maybe if they are forced to read the Constitution and pass a comprehensive test on the contents PRIOR to their being sworn-in to their elected office we might see fewer of the type now so prevalent. Maybe the ignorant moronic branch of Government could be reduced significantly through such actions. Maybe we also urge the coining of a new personal description---the "Hunter Biden type" (or syndrome, or...)---One completely unskilled, lacking experience or any other qualification for the job to which they are elected, appointed or otherwise about to hold.
Sir they have read and understand the constitution. The problem is they want to rewrite it. All of it.
Hahahahahahaha.
Another reason I love this board. A trumper talking about others not knowing the Constitution.
You can’t make this **** up.
Nobody has a worae understanding of the Constitution than you. I mean the board had to explain Cloture to you.
You may be right, but I find it difficult to comprehend that they have read AND understand while swearing an oath to SUPPORT the document as a qualification for the office they plan to occupy. Maybe there is need for legislation that makes the above scenario a felony punishable by removal from the office they currently hold. Call it 'making a false oath to a Government official' --similar to lying tot he FBI and with similar punishment