Giving Liam Clifford $500,000 and then losing 5 stars recruits for money is nuts.
You totally have me confused with someone else for sure. You sound triggered. I've commented that $500,000 to Clifford and DeLuca was too much. But that's about it. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm just putting 2 + 2 together and thinking why PS might have lost recruit battles in 2026, given the current talk about how Franklin wanted top spend NIL money, and Kraft didn't see eye to eye with him.You can't make up your mind. High price players you complain. Low price players uou complain. High price staff you complain. Low price staff, complain.
His plan seemed to be to pay money to get guys to return to go for a championship run, even at the expense of the recruiting class. I was fine with that plan. Then, he forgot he was supposed to actually coach the team to win a championship. So instead of sacrificing a recruiting as the cost for a championship, we ended up losing recruiting by battles and could couldn’t beat a UCLA team without a coaching staff.You totally have me confused with someone else for sure. You sound triggered. I've commented that $500,000 to Clifford and DeLuca was too much. But that's about it. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm just putting 2 + 2 together and thinking why PS might have lost recruit battles in 2026, given the current talk about how Franklin wanted top spend NIL money, and Kraft didn't see eye to eye with him.
You totally have me confused with someone else for sure. You sound triggered. I've commented that $500,000 to Clifford and DeLuca was too much. But that's about it. I don't know what you're talking about. I'm just putting 2 + 2 together and thinking why PS might have lost recruit battles in 2026, given the current talk about how Franklin wanted top spend NIL money, and Kraft didn't see eye to eye with him.
Maybe not. But we would never know if we kept Franklin. And if we can’t attract 5 stars, at least we can get a coach that won’t make in-game blunders.Or maybe five stars don’t want to come to PSU because of other reasons besides the coach. I guess we’ll find out.
I 100% guarantee he will make in game blunders as does every coach on the planet especially those that you watch every game. I don’t think Campbell is the savior you think he’s going to be.Maybe not. But we would never know if we kept Franklin. And if we can’t attract 5 stars, at least we can get a coach that won’t make in-game blunders.
There is no way to quantify how well or how poorly Campbell will do with the resources available to him at Penn State.I 100% guarantee he will make in game blunders as does every coach on the planet especially those that you watch every game. I don’t think Campbell is the savior you think he’s going to be.
I agree, but for someone to say that we’re getting a coach that won’t make in game blunders is just ridiculous.There is no way to quantify how well or how poorly Campbell will do with the resources available to him at Penn State.
How many Penn State fans does it take to change a light bulb? Three…one to change it and two to talk about how great the old one was. This joke applies to Steeler fans as well.Looking at all aspects (leader of men, # of wins, bowl record, financial contributions), Joe is a clear #1. His most important contributions in CFB were in development of young men.
And since there is no more college football and only minor league football, his position as GOAT is secure.
Wrong again, Lando - but you are used to that by now!
Proof of NIL mismanagement:List what the other WR and LBs are getting and we can compare.
If you dont know what the others are getting then you really dont know if Deluca or Clifford were getting too much.
If the 500k is correct????Proof of NIL mismanagement:
1) I checked the On3 transfer portal list. Nick Marsh is a 4 star WR, the number 1 receiver in the portal and he has a value of $531,000. There's two 4 star LB who have NIL value in the mid $300K range. Clifford and DeLuca are not 4 star players. Clifford would not be the number 1 WR in the portal. Clifford and DeLuca were getting too much, if the $500K amount is correct.
2) Further proof is Kraft's displeasure at how Franklin was spending NIL.
3) Even more proof is all the recruiting battles Franklin lost in 2026, despite that we now know PS had competitive NIL to offer. They've got 34 million for Campbell, which is more than LSU. Why all the recruiting losses?
I'm pretty convinced, there was NIL mismanagement.
We won’t know until teammates start talking after the bowl game.If the 500k is correct????
Proof based on internet rumors.
YesSo was Franklin just a poor recruiter, judge of talent, or player development?
Maybe not. But we would never know if we kept Franklin. And if we can’t attract 5 stars, at least we can get a coach that won’t make in-game blunders.
It is still second hand info.We won’t know until teammates start talking after the bowl game.
He had more resources at ISU than Toledo does (and did at that time) and his winning percentage went from 68% to 57%. So, it is possible to quantify what Campy will do at Penn State with the resources available, based on his history of having more resources available to him at ISU than he did at Toledo.There is no way to quantify how well or how poorly Campbell will do with the resources available to him at Penn State.
Tell us just how he will do if you are such a know-it-all.He had more resources at ISU than Toledco does (and did at that time) and his winning percentage went from 68% to 57%. So, it is possible to quantify what Campy will do at Penn State with the resources available, based on his history of having more resources available to him at ISU than he did at Toledo.
I am not a know it all.Tell us just how he will do if you are such a know-it-all.
I think you need to throw in the fact that the quality of opponents faced went up as well. No one knows the future, but I love this hire, we'll see how it plays out. I don't and won't miss James Franklin, just my opinion.He had more resources at ISU than Toledo does (and did at that time) and his winning percentage went from 68% to 57%. So, it is possible to quantify what Campy will do at Penn State with the resources available, based on his history of having more resources available to him at ISU than he did at Toledo.
Oh yes, the quality of opponents did go up, just as they have gone up with his move to the Big Ten. In my opinion, the quality of oppnents have gone up exponentially in the Big 10 relative to the Big 12.I think you need to throw in the fact that the quality of opponents faced went up as well. No one knows the future, but I love this hire, we'll see how it plays out. I don't and won't miss James Franklin, just my opinion.
He had more resources at ISU than Toledo does (and did at that time) and his winning percentage went from 68% to 57%. So, it is possible to quantify what Campy will do at Penn State with the resources available, based on his history of having more resources available to him at ISU than he did at Toledo.
If we are going to go down the route that uses the metric of winning percentage in light of resources, then we need to compare the level of resources Toledo possesses in relation to its peers in the MAC versus the level of resources ISU possesses in relation to its peers in the Big 12. That comparison is probably a little complex and difficult to make.Apples to oranges. Comparing a MAC team with a B12 team is meaningless as the resources needed in the respective conferences relative to their competitors vastly differ. Or ISU may have more resources in absolute terms than Toledo but if ISU's resources are significantly less than their competitors in the B12 having more money than Toledo is meaningless. The fact is that he had a stellar career at ISU by any realistic metric, especially if you look at the program's historical trajectory. So, his winning percentages at the two locations are incommensurate. You simply cannot quantify how his ability to create a winning tradition at Ames will translate to a program with: 1, much greater resources; 2. much better brand recognition; 3. A history of success; 4. Recruit access. 5. Massive recruiting staff, Why? Because he had none of these at Ames.
You are not pleased with the Campbell hire? Good for you. Can he win a championship? Who knows. But the two "data points" provide little value. It also depends on what you valuing as a your data set. I look at his record at Ames compared to the previous coaches and records at ISU and see a very skilled, capable coach that did a great deal with very little. It will be interesting to see what he will do with a lot.
Forget about the losses or whether or not he was a good coach. He went over his boss's head to the board for a contract extension. Such a breach of trust is a singular terminable offense to me, yet Kraft let him stay on a bit.No, I’ve just seen how this board is. Every loss is the coach’s fault, PSU has more talent than every team they play except OSU (but we’re close), and 10 wins is easy. The posters that think this will never be happy with any coach. And let’s not forget that JoePa never made a mistake and was unbeatable. All these things point to giving up on any coach in a short period of time.
Correct, and not only that. You need to compare recruiting density relative to the two programs (how many MAC level players geographically proximate to Toledo, how many D! level players proximate to Ames, what competition is there for these respective recruiting pools, brand recognition, staff and so on}. Hence, my earlier comment that how Campbell does at PSU is impossible to quantify given all these variables.If we are going to go down the route that uses the metric of winning percentage in light of resources, then we need to compare the level of resources Toledo possesses in relation to its peers in the MAC versus the level of resources ISU possesses in relation to its peers in the Big 12. That comparison is probably a little complex and difficult to make.
I agree, but for someone to say that we’re getting a coach that won’t make in game blunders is just ridiculous.
One would also have to recognize that ISU's historical conference affiliation changed dramatically over recent years.Apples to oranges. Comparing a MAC team with a B12 team is meaningless as the resources needed in the respective conferences relative to their competitors vastly differ. Or ISU may have more resources in absolute terms than Toledo but if ISU's resources are significantly less than their competitors in the B12 having more money than Toledo is meaningless. The fact is that he had a stellar career at ISU by any realistic metric, especially if you look at the program's historical trajectory. So, his winning percentages at the two locations are incommensurate. You simply cannot quantify how his ability to create a winning tradition at Ames will translate to a program with: 1, much greater resources; 2. much better brand recognition; 3. A history of success; 4. Recruit access. 5. Massive recruiting staff, Why? Because he had none of these at Ames.
You are not pleased with the Campbell hire? Good for you. Can he win a championship? Who knows. But the two "data points" provide little value. It also depends on what you valuing as a your data set. I look at his record at Ames compared to the previous coaches and records at ISU and see a very skilled, capable coach that did a great deal with very little. It will be interesting to see what he will do with a lot.
True thatHence, my earlier comment that how Campbell does at PSU is difficult to quantify given all these variables.
Yes indeed. God is in the details.One would also have to recognize that ISU's historical conference affiliation changed dramatically over recent years.
From the original Big 12, there was the exodus of Texas A&M, Nebraska, and Missouri - and more recently of Texas and Oklahoma - those moves dramatically dropped the level of ISU's competition from what it was previously. Most of those changes happened around 2011- 2012, and Oklahoma and Texas two years ago.
And also much less competitive than ISU's prior affiliation with the old Big 8.
ISU circa 2012 onward was playing in a much less competitive conference than at any time prior.
Another way to think about this hire is to consider alternative scenarios. Michigan is looking for a coach now. Would everyone feel better if we still had BGJ and they had hired Matt Campbell? How about if Michigan somehow poached BGJ from VT? How about if they got Daboll? If Michigan doesn't get DeBoer, it sure feels to me that they are more than likely going to hire the next Moeller, Hoke or RichRod than they are the next Harbaugh.Correct, and not only that. You need to compare recruiting density relative to the two programs, brand recognition, staff and so on. Hence, my earlier comment that how Campbell does at PSU is difficult to quantify given all these variables.
So true, but fans live inside their own box and tend to realize they are the genius after a play or a game. Did James have some head scratchers, for sure he did. Every coach does, but hopefully Campbell is a better organizer and adjuster in game. Time will tell but the JF hate as if you win that many games on accident of dumb luck is idiotic ex girlfriend type of stuff.I 100% guarantee he will make in game blunders as does every coach on the planet especially those that you watch every game. I don’t think Campbell is the savior you think he’s going to be.
That said: Iowa won 7 out of 10 vs ISUI was concerned at first about how Campbell would do against the BIG until I saw his record against Iowa. He played them every year and gave them fits. My guess is Iowa is ecstatic he's at PSU.
Let's all hope CMC doesn't ice his own kicker like BGJ did onceSo true, but fans live inside their own box and tend to realize they are the genius after a play or a game. Did James have some head scratchers, for sure he did. Every coach does, but hopefully Campbell is a better organizer and adjuster in game. Time will tell but the JF hate as if you win that many games on accident of dumb luck is idiotic ex girlfriend type of stuff.
They aren't hoping for a savior, they're hoping they were right about James Franklin.I 100% guarantee he will make in game blunders as does every coach on the planet especially those that you watch every game. I don’t think Campbell is the savior you think he’s going to be.
Where do you get off counting someone else’s paychecks? Clifford and DeLucca represent exactly the type of players I want at Penn State.Proof of NIL mismanagement:
1) I checked the On3 transfer portal list. Nick Marsh is a 4 star WR, the number 1 receiver in the portal and he has a value of $531,000. There's two 4 star LB who have NIL value in the mid $300K range. Clifford and DeLuca are not 4 star players. Clifford would not be the number 1 WR in the portal. Clifford and DeLuca were getting too much, if the $500K amount is correct.
2) Further proof is Kraft's displeasure at how Franklin was spending NIL.
3) Even more proof is all the recruiting battles Franklin lost in 2026, despite that we now know PS had competitive NIL to offer. They've got 34 million for Campbell, which is more than LSU. Why all the recruiting losses?
I'm pretty convinced, there was NIL mismanagement.
You have your opinion, I have mine. I'm not the only one who feels that way. There are plenty of posts to that effect on this board. I'm not the first person to say they think someone is overpaid. I'd be shocked if you were to claim you haven't said it in your lifetime about someone. It's not outrageous and doesn't deserve a personal attack of "where do I get off..."Where do you get off counting someone else’s paychecks? Clifford and DeLucca represent exactly the type of players I want at Penn State.
Clifford was arguably one of the most versatile players on the roster this year. He sacrificed any realistic opportunity to play wide receiver and instead stepped up at quarterback because the team needed him there. He was the last option—and he embraced it. He led, he competed, and he put the program ahead of himself. That matters.
DeLucca was a team leader in the truest sense. A captain. A starter. A steady presence. Without him, Penn State likely does not reach six wins this season. His impact went beyond the stat sheet and into preparation, accountability, and consistency.
These kids were not superstars. They were not game-breakers. If Penn State could have upgraded the roster at those positions, they would have. They didn’t—and these players stepped up anyway.
Clifford and DeLucca embodied what it means to be a Penn State football player: selfless, tough, dependable, and committed to the team above all else. Those are the players programs are built on.
Clifford had 3 rec for 25 yard and 1 rush for 2 yards. $125,000 per touch in a game. That's a great gig if you can get it, kind of like being a fired football coach getting a buyout or a bench player in a pro league making bank without ever seeing the field.Where do you get off counting someone else’s paychecks? Clifford and DeLucca represent exactly the type of players I want at Penn State.
Clifford was arguably one of the most versatile players on the roster this year. He sacrificed any realistic opportunity to play wide receiver and instead stepped up at quarterback because the team needed him there. He was the last option—and he embraced it. He led, he competed, and he put the program ahead of himself. That matters.
DeLucca was a team leader in the truest sense. A captain. A starter. A steady presence. Without him, Penn State likely does not reach six wins this season. His impact went beyond the stat sheet and into preparation, accountability, and consistency.
These kids were not superstars. They were not game-breakers. If Penn State could have upgraded the roster at those positions, they would have. They didn’t—and these players stepped up anyway.
Clifford and DeLucca embodied what it means to be a Penn State football player: selfless, tough, dependable, and committed to the team above all else. Those are the players programs are built on.
And consider that “stars” aren’t from a blood test, it’s some service’s opinion. Franklin may have been chasing stars but Harbaugh may have been digging a little deeper on own. There’s a rb for Southern Lehigh who is one of only 5 players to ever rush for more than 3,000 yards (including 300+ in state title game), yet no PSU offer. CF needs Sabermetrics, whatever coach nails that will clean up.Where is this narrative coming from in this thread that PSU has not been recruiting as much talent as Michigan? Look at the data. For the majority of the last decade Penn State and Michigan have been in the same talent tier in recruiting rankings—often very close to each other in the total team talent rankings. Even this season, PSU ranks #10 while UM ranks #11 (source). Look at the year UM won the national championship: PSU ranked #13 and UM #14 (source). I've argued a number of times before on these boards that what Michigan accomplished on the field (minus cheating) is theoretically possible for PSU given that they recruit on a very similar level. Michigan was able to develop a couple of critical positions better and find a real identity on offense that they made work regardless of who they played. Can't say the same for PSU. The hope is that the new staff can find similar success.
There was a time when Saban was mediocre at MSU; Jimmy Johnson was just okay at OK State; Urban was at pre-P5 Utah; Kirby was an assistant at Alabama; Pete Carrol was a fired NFL coach. All around Campbell’s age now.Oh yes, the quality of opponents did go up, just as they have gone up with his move to the Big Ten. In my opinion, the quality of oppnents have gone up exponentially in the Big 10 relative to the Big 12.
I think he was the best realistic option that was available. However, Kraft (and everyone else associated with PSU football) wants to win a National Championship - which Campy has not done. The coaches that have proven track records of winning a NC or have proven to be within the discussion each year.....were untouchable.