More Love for Lindsey

NURoseBowl

Junior
Jun 16, 2009
8,081
254
58
Just curious, but as a purely practical matter, might it be conceivable that they might allow a bit more than just the families of the players and coaches at the women's games? Realistically, there might typically be one or two thousand at those games, which would seemingly allow ample space to spread out. Playing at maybe 15% of capacity would allow most (or for some games, all) of the fans who normally go to these games to attend. Limiting attendance to what, maybe 1000 or 1200 people spread throughout Welsh-Ryan - while enforcing mandatory masking - would seem to be on the proper side of reckless, I would think. Thoughts?
 

NJCat

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2016
21,190
1,314
113
Just curious, but as a purely practical matter, might it be conceivable that they might allow a bit more than just the families of the players and coaches at the women's games? Realistically, there might typically be one or two thousand at those games, which would seemingly allow ample space to spread out. Playing at maybe 15% of capacity would allow most (or for some games, all) of the fans who normally go to these games to attend. Limiting attendance to what, maybe 1000 or 1200 people spread throughout Welsh-Ryan - while enforcing mandatory masking - would seem to be on the proper side of reckless, I would think. Thoughts?
If the B1G conference isn't allowing people outdoors at football games, then highly unlikely they will allow spectators in gyms. Seem to be taking an ultraconservative approach, even if the risks to the scenario you lay out are small.
 

NURoseBowl

Junior
Jun 16, 2009
8,081
254
58
Makes sense, Fitz. I just hadn't heard anything one way or another, and something like this seemed at least a semi-plausible possibility.